Jump to content

rob1985

Member
  • Posts

    18
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Awards

This user doesn't have any awards

1 Follower

About rob1985

  • Birthday Feb 06, 1985

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Member title
    Junior Member

System

  • CPU
    i7 2600k @4.6Ghz
  • Motherboard
    asrock z77 extreme 4
  • RAM
    16gb kingston hyper x fury
  • GPU
    msi gtx 970

rob1985's Achievements

  1. Username: Rob1985 Favourite Vids: https://www.vessel.com/videos/JYZEYDYx0 https://www.vessel.com/videos/JemZ8O7Hy Twitter share: https://twitter.com/homeoteleuton/status/580393783759638528
  2. Ah Torchwood! They need to make another series! Do you consider yourself part of the "scene" and if so would you say you belong to any particular sub-culture? eg are you a bear/daddy/twink/jock?
  3. Meh, playing Jack Harkness he is sexy; being John Barrowman, however, I find him incredibly irritating.
  4. On another more cheeky note, it'd definitely add new meaning to when Linus says, "I hope you guys are liking the glamour shots we've been including in the recent videos".
  5. No, the choice should be Linus's as to what he uploads for his audience, which is why I believe the poll was not the greatest idea. Your free will isn't being impacted by Linus's decision, as similar, if not almost identical, content is available elsewhere. Freedom of speech/expression doesn't give one the right to whatever you suppose you ought to have, merely the right to say it or make it yourself (though I fear I may be heading off on somewhat of a tangent). If you want to see booth-babes, you still can. Why they have to be on this particular forum only serves to offend certain people who are here. Seeing as though the content is freely available elsewhere, preserving the status quo seems the logical choice. Those who want to see booth-babes can, either here, but not posted by Linus, or via a search engine; those who don't want it on the forum aren't offended. Yay for neutrality! I'm actually ambivalent about the content myself (it can hardly be gratuitous), but don't see the benefit to the community by posting material which has clearly caused strong reactions. In response to the "mute" point, (to which i really wanna go "[sic] moot"), I'd presume the video is a montage of all the footage that contained the women (and man, oh my!) from across the show rather than an actual attempt to document the eye-candy from the offset (someone feel free to clarify). Judging by the amount of footage and content provided by the teams, and their level of fatigue, I don't think they'd have had the time to just film them. Perhaps editing it together and asking the community was a bad idea...either way it sparks debate and adds interest to the forum. Nice work Linus! *cheesy thumbs up* Finally, just because, I'd like to add this: the mere fact they are called "booth-babes" seems to nullify the arguments that they aren't being objectified by the audience...(and possibly the fact I dubbed them "eye-candy", purely non-sexual, I'm gay) I doubt many people wake up in the morning, model or otherwise and think "oh yeah, I'm such a babe", and if they do, may I just say ASSHAT! Dissect away, I shan't be offended.
  6. I'm quite at a loss as to why this has become such a massive topic, other than as a soundboard for the patriarchy/feminist arguments that you see popping up in many threads. From the standpoint of professionalism, it makes perfect sense for Linus Media Group not to post the video, and frankly I would have taken Linus's decision, albeit without a poll. Furthermore, it should be noted that Linus and the mod team are not stopping you from looking at the booth-babes: there are pictures on the forum posted by forum members. To me, at least, it seems at odds with Linus's drive for a more professional set-up, and a tad disrespectful of what he is trying to achieve, for forum members to expect him to actually provide the material that some people may find offensive.
  7. The BBC has posted an interesting article about EA and their image within the gaming world. With so much vitriol aimed at the company - just check out the memes thread - especially since its naming as "worst company" for another year, EA's president of labels, Frank Gibeau stated: "We're in the business of entertaining and exciting people, and when our business policies get in the way of that and we hear this reaction and see this feedback we have to take note of it. We're not tone deaf." I wonder what the forum's repsonse to this would be? Especially after the Sims fiasco and the news a few weeks back, also mentioned by Linus and Slick on the live-stream, about major job losses in previously successful firms that EA has acquired and seemingly destroyed, as well as the churning out year-by-year of the 'cash-cow' titles. Are they, as Mark Burnham, the editor of Game Front pointed out, just a "scapegoat for larger industry trends... [or are they] not caring what players think or want." I'd love to hear what you guys think. Is it just lip-service by EA, or will there be any changes? Clicky here for the article: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-22801311
  8. Thanks for yet another awesome giveaway (x4) Linus! Tweeted: https://twitter.com/homeoteleuton/status/339715176448262144
  9. Heads up denizens of the forum: Linus announced on Twitter that the live stream will remain on Friday evenings to accommodate the Oz-folk, but will be moved to 16.00 Canadafordshire time. https://twitter.com/LinusTech/status/327678243664719872
  10. awesome giveaway - many thanks to intel and gigabyte! *fingers crossed*
×