willmc

Just an FYI, my sub page is back and looks like no changes in the format were made. Edit: Spoke to soon. It was for one refresh and gone again.

Same here. I just hope this isn't a "limited trial" of a new program.

I actually feel bad for this guy. Clearly he's unqualified to make this tutorial video but I have a feeling it's not his fault.The Verge probably had this video on their to do list, no one picked it up, and then they assigned this to some intern, who probably didn't ask for it, last minute because Capital One already paid for it. I have a feeling he probably googled a bunch of stuff and had no time to really research the topic. The fact that he used LOL to benchmark the PC indicates this, probably from a Google search for popular games, because if you look at the actual game play, he clearly does not play at all. I hope the guy in the video doesn't get too much grief. The Verge on the other hand should have known better.

I just posted this on Jayz video: I'd like to start this post with the declaration that I believe that none of the people on that list actually demanded money for coverage. Most of these channels have made a video posting about how they do make their money, and I believe in the high level of integrity of these people. Now that being said, I am not an officer of the court and I don't have access to any materials and/or evidence pertaining to a possible defamation case. I have some people say that this isn't important and these guys should just let it go. I disagree with that. By posting this list, Kumar has attempted to hurt these people professionally, and since these people are self employed, that turns into a personal and financial attack. It is true that most of these guys can weather this type of accusation and come out the other side unharmed, but I also don't believe that one should be able to just throw their hands up after such a malicious attack, state "It was just a prank bro", and walk away from this without consequence. This guy has shown that he's willing to hurt people unjustly for gain and will probably do so again unless he's shown that there is punishment as a result. A lawsuit from one or more of the accused can do this. I'm not suggesting that he should be buried financially to the point of no return. I think court costs and $1 punitive should be fine. What this will accomplish is to put on public record that this guy can and will put out false information, and is not to be trusted as a source of information. It will take time and hard work if he wants to rehabilitate any reputation he has, and it should be that way after something like this. And if he attempts to do this again, then you have court evidence of past behavior and inclination. In the end, court action might not only prevent someone that has proven to use this type of attack from doing so again, but hopefully dissuades anyone else that might use these types of tactics for potential growth. Show less REPLY