Merry

Bro, lemme explain it to you :

Whatever the tools you give to a kid, that's not the point.

What you gotta understand, is that learning and education require specific processes, and our actual education system is based on incremental improvements over decades/centuries/...
Just giving a kid the exact same education, weither it's on a computer, in books, orally, ... Doesn't really influentate the kid's future.

Now what I'm thinking, it's that computers, books, oral, teachers ... Can only reach a limit when teaching to a kid, and that computer can raise this ceilling over other methods.

But it requires long-term planning, devellopment of educationnal programs, tutorings, ... And especially a higher ceiling of the education given itself.

Long story short : if you spend 10 years teaching 1+1 = 2 to a kid, he'll have as good results weither he learnt on a computer or from a teacher with 30 years of experience.
Now, if you accumulate the knowledges, stats, referencing and feedbacks on a teaching method that's 1000% better at collecting them than the others, there you'll have significant results.

And you having biased opinions about tablets, like previous generations had about computers, rock-and-roll and others, has nothing to do with the efficiency of new methods.

Bro, lemme explain it to you :

Whatever the tools you give to a kid, that's not the point.

What you gotta understand, is that learning and education require specific processes, and our actual education system is based on incremental improvements over decades/centuries/...
Just giving a kid the exact same education, weither it's on a computer, in books, orally, ... Doesn't really influentate the kid's future.

Now what I'm thinking, it's that computers, books, oral, teachers ... Can only reach a limit when teaching to a kid, and that computer can raise this ceilling over other methods.

But it requires long-term planning, devellopment of educationnal programs, tutorings, ... And especially a higher ceiling of the education given itself.

Long story short : if you spend 10 years teaching 1+1 = 2 to a kid, he'll have as good results weither he learnt on a computer or from a teacher with 30 years of experience.
Now, if you accumulate the knowledges, stats, referencing and feedbacks on a teaching method that's 1000% better at collecting them than the others, there you'll have significant results.

And you having biased opinions about tablets, like previous generations had about computers, rock-and-roll and others, has nothing to do with the efficiency of new methods.

It also can fly, by the look of it, a single fan cooling two fijis ...

It's over 9000!
 
...
(RPM)