Jump to content

Tylandord

Member
  • Posts

    28
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Awards

This user doesn't have any awards

1 Follower

About Tylandord

  • Birthday May 10, 1999

Contact Methods

  • Steam
    14SwordGundam
  • PlayStation Network
    Tylandord
  • Twitch.tv
    Twitch.tv/
  • Twitter
    https://twitter.com/webster_jared

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Spokane Valley,wa
  • Interests
    Metalworks,Computer Hardware,Blacksmithing.
  • Occupation
    student

System

  • CPU
    Intel Core 2 Duo Quad CPU Q6600 2.4 ghz
  • GPU
    Nvidia GeForce GT630
  • Storage
    Western Digital wd5000ks-00mnb0
  • Display(s)
    Samsung SyncMaster 940BX, Samsung SyncMaster 914V
  • Cooling
    Stock intel fan/heatsink
  • Keyboard
    Logitech G110
  • Mouse
    Logitech M510
  • Sound
    Logitech X-530
  • Operating System
    Windows 7 Professional

Tylandord's Achievements

  1. That looks really cool I'd love to have one for a future projector/console gaming room.
  2. So I recently bought an Mx Master from Logitech, and I've run into an issue. Although I feel like it could be fixed, I just don't quite know how it would work. What I want to do is macro the gesture button to complete pings in league of legends for me, that way I have fewer keystrokes needed in order to initiate these pings. they way i want it to work is make it so that the gesture buttons 4 directions for its gestures are each considered their own key or something similar, so that league of legends recognized each as their own key stroke. Currently I have to press control and left click then drag but I would like to just press the gesture button and drag in the proper direction in order to ping as well as use the neutral press as control. I've tried using the advanced click feature but that didn't work as well as the modifier key function which was better but not what I would like, seeing that I would still have to use 2 key strokes (the gesture button and left click which required a very strange grip to accomplish) instead of one press one and dragging the mouse. If anyone could help that would be much appreciated. Thanks!
  3. Username:Tylandord Favorite video's https://www.vessel.com/videos/G-DUjgUyYand https://www.vessel.com/videos/Su_Wqd7Vl
  4. I am the only one apparently..... it's so lonely and cold over here by myself.
  5. Intel is getting to the point where they cannot continue to use silicon because its becoming more and more difficult to manufacture, ergo higher manufacturing costs. In the long run it will be cheaper and more efficient to switch materials.
  6. @szomeret They are already using silicon i just put it in as a joke.
  7. @Lazmarr I totally agree on the point of graphene being better for the environment and to the people that are exposed to it. It's just a safer option.
  8. @wpirobotbuilder I'm not really worried about that, they haven't said anything besides they are looking into new materials, which we already knew. And plus they haven't even said what materials will be used. Also it's not like I leaked the specs or got a photo of the new processor. Honeywell manufactures a very large portion of materials for Intel and other computer parts manufacturers already so it should be no surprise that they would continue to work together.
  9. I agree that III-V is probably a better solution. I'm really just a graphene fanboy.
  10. I understand your point and I agree. III-V (indium-gallium-arsenide) does seem the most promising, I'm just a Graphene fanboy.
  11. I agree, Graphene seems to be the most interesting material in my mind. Although I don't know much about III-V materials. I should do some research.
  12. So I watched the wan show on Youtube about the new materials for Intel's future plans for the 7 nm process. So I talked to my source who works over at the Honeywell factory in Spokane Washington, and I told him about the possibilities of III-V(indium-gallium-arsenide), Graphene, and carbon nano-tubes possibly being candidates for the new materials in Intel's processors instead of silicon. Then earlier today they told me that there was a huge worldwide Honeywell meeting being broadcast live to all of the Honeywell people and they talked about issues on this and that. Then they asked "Does anyone have any questions," but because the people talking were real big shots everyone was silent. So my source decided to stand up and ask "I have a question" to the whole world of Honeywell people. And they asked "So what are we going to do when we can't use silicon anymore, and need to start manufacturing new materials like indium-gallium-arsenide". the big shot guy said "That is a very good question." he continued "You're talking about Intel's new 7 nm process aren't you?" my source replied "I am indeed". Then big-shot guy said "I will be pleased to tell you that Intel will be working with with Honeywell to manufacture these new materials to make their 7nm processors". So the short of it is Intel is already working towards manufacturing these new 7 nm processors with Honeywell. Personally, I'm stoked about the new possibilities for new materials in future technologies. This is super cool.
×