Search the Community

So, i've now benchmarked my Ryzen 5 3600X in Cinbench R20 and got 3703 Points. But in here https://www.cgdirector.com/cinebench-r20-scores-updated-results/ , i have seen that a Ryzen 5 3600X should go up to 3890-ish score. So i have stated Ryzen Master and saw that my CPU only boosts up to 4.1mhz, sometimes a little more. Normally, it should easily boost up to 4.3mHz, shouldnt it? And it doesnt even really run hot because 65-66C is the most it reaches under the Cinebench load. So my questions is, is my CPU bad or do i oversee something important? I've also checked for BIOS and Chipset Driver updates beforehand, was nothing there to update to. Specs are: R5 3600X Cougar Aqua 240 with 2 Arctic P12 fans. ASUS TUF X570 Gaming Plus WiFi GTX 1070 16GB 3200mHz CL16 Corsair Vengeance Corsair TX750M

Hi, I recently Got 5600x and playing around with OC as below: activating PBO advance PBO - Advanced PBO Limits - Motherboard PBO Scalar - Auto Curve Optimizer - negative 20 (all cores) Max Boost Clock Override - 200 MHz Thermal Throttle Limit - 95°C ) On Cinebench r20 I get 622 Single core which is higher that most scores I can found online but only 4496 multi core score which is lower than some scores online? https://www.cpu-monkey.com/en/cpu-amd_ryzen_5_5600x-1750 While benchmarking most cores boost at 4650mhz and 4625mhz only, on single core test cores boost to 4850mhz. Temps never exceeds 75c while benchmarking on R20 at 106w power consumption. Full specs: GB aorus Elite X570 4 X 8GB 3200mhz DDR4 6800xt

Been messing with overclocking on and off ever since I got my 3600 (nice cpu by the way), and I recently discovered that it seems "stable" at higher clocks than initial testing suggested, so trying to see if that's actually viable running 4.45ghz instead of the usual plebeian 4.4ghz - doesn't make a real difference, but higher numbers = better. Cinebench was set to high priority in windows 10 task manager - affinity was set to cpu 0. So far CPU 0 seems to be the only one doing this, others report normally. *Edit common trend. So with that in mind I present to you these lovely screen grabs. I wasn't quick enough to screen grab it, but core temp briefly reported a 2401W power draw which honestly seemed a little excessive for a 1 thread workload. Not sure what there's to learn from that. Probably wont matter, but running an ASRock Phantom Gaming 4 570x board, the 3600 and windows 10. Rest of specs shouldn't be relevant for this.

Summary The Cinebench R20 score of an AMD Ryzen 7 7700X "Zen 4" processor (possibly engineering sample), was allegedly leaked to the web by "Extreme Player Hall," a video-format tech news published on Bili Bili, as discovered by 9550pro on Twitter. The 8-core/16-thread processor was shown scoring 773 points in the single-thread test, and 7701 points in the multi-threaded one. These numbers put it 25-30 percent faster than the current Ryzen 7 5800X. Quotes My thoughts This is quite what I was expecting as we slowly approach the 29th (more performance leaks of Zen 4 7000 series). I posted a Geekbench 5 result of an EYPC Zen 4 setup yesterday that was 17% faster in single-thread than its Zen 3 counterpart; showing some decent gains. Here we are seeing even better results with around 25% single-core performance uplift over a 5800X. Even the multi-core result is a nice uplift at 33%. This is good because here we have an Engineering Sample (or QS) without knowing the actual clocks nor cooling or voltage and it's already 23-25% faster than a 5800X in single thread at most likely stock settings. Sources https://videocardz.com/newz/amd-ryzen-7-7700x-is-20-faster-than-ryzen-7-5800x-in-leaked-single-core-cinebench-r20-test https://www.techpowerup.com/298111/amd-ryzen-7-7700x-zen-4-cinebench-r20-score-leaked https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1KV4y1W77z Update to this story ~ Summary AMD Ryzen 7700X/7600X rumored Cinebench R23 scores are in. AMD mid-range Ryzen 7000 SKUs will score above 1900 points in ST. Multi-core benchmark results were also shared. Quotes My thoughts While this hopefully is an ES, it is most likely a QS; which means this is about as close to final performance we're going to get (meaning not much is going to be different from retail product as if it were an ES). This is where I believe they won't quite be able to surpass Raptor Lake, and are just about matching Alder Lake. The good thing though is this is only Cinebench and we need to see some other benchmarks (like gaming) before we jump to any conclusions. Because at the end of the day price to performance is what matters, so what the 7000 series will be priced at will determine how competitive it is against Alder/Raptor Lake. Sources https://www.techpowerup.com/298165/amd-ryzen-7-7700x-and-ryzen-5-7600x-cinebench-r23-single-thread-numbers-see-it-trade-blows-with-the-competition https://overclock3d.net/news/cpu_mainboard/ryzen_7700x_and_7600x_cinebench_r23_scores_leak_-_impressive_results/1 https://videocardz.com/newz/amd-ryzen-7700x-7600x-rumored-cinebench-r23-scores-are-in

so this is my first time posting on these forums. i just got done building my new PC um running an asus maximus xi hero with an i9 9900kf clocked at 4.9ghz memory is 32gb of corsairs 3000mhz ram with a 2080fe liquid cooled. is 4758 a good score. for cinebench

Hello, new user here, so apologies (for my english also) if the thread is in a wrong spot. I have a new (first) build and have some difficulties.. My ryzen 3900x cpu doesn't perform as it should. During the cinebench r20 the clock speed drops from 3.5-4.2 gHz (normal sort of operation internet and idle when most cores do nothing) to 3.1gHz (pictures included) on all cores and it utilizes only 80% of the cpu (some times even less) and I get a score of about 5300 to 5500 (on a very cold run right after start up). Single core performance is ok I think, it clocks to 4.4gHz (score about 500). I have done some bios changes, because I didn't like the temperatures I was seeing (75C when downloading from steam), currently I am running the stock wraith prism cooler, but am waiting for an upgrade next week. I did the sort of things like I have seen JayzTwoCents do in his video (cpu max voltage to 1.35 such stuff) and it helped a bit but my performance went down under. Now dirung cinebench r20 I hit 75C (before it was 80) and If I run two tests in a row it throttles down to 2.9 gHz. Before the bios changes I scored around 6700, but the temps were not ok and the cooler was very loud. Now I wish to get some of the performance back, because I wish to run some simulations (reason why I got this cpu), but have no idea what the things in ryzen Master mean (like what is 100% PPT and why is it at 100%).. Will try to set bios to default, when I upgread the cooler and see what I get, but would like to know more about this to fix if any new problems come.. Components: CPU R9 3900x Motherboard Asus x570 TUF gaming plus Ram: G.skill trident Z neo 3600Mzh C16 Cooler: Wraith Prism (upgreading to Mugen 5) Thank you in adwance for your help.

So I have a Ryzen 5 2600, 16gb ddr4 ram, 500gb ssd all on a B450 Tomahawk with a Corsair TX650 PSU? (its 80+ gold and from corsair) My R5 2600 is OC to 4.0 GHz at 1.34v. This has been stable since I have ran prime95 for over an hour and I have had this OC since last year in around June 2019. However, just out of nowhere I said Ill run cinebench R20 cause why not. It does fine the first 75% then when its closer to being at the end squares it just gets a black screen, BUT my PC is still on and the fans are still running like its on. However, the keyboard and mouse RGB is off and the screen is black and my monitor says "going to power save" which is what it says when I turn my PC off or put it in sleep mode. Is this a power issue or CPU issue? Other benchmarks work fine.

I have a xeon L5420, 4gb of ram and a gtx 650 power edition. Some told me on discord to compare it to identical systems but no identical systems show up.

Hello everyone! Hope you're staying safe throughout this quarantine. I've been gaming a lot lately and have noticed a huge decrease in performance with my almost 5 year-old i5 6600. It's paired with a GTX 1070 and 16 GB of 2133 MHz DDR4 RAM on a MSI B150 Gaming M3 motherboard and I'm playing in 1080p on a 144 Hz monitor. Basically, my CPU is bottlenecking the GPU quite hard, to the point where games like Fortnite or R6S, no matter on what settings, the CPU usage is 100% while my GPU is chilling in about the 70-80 percents and even my discord stops working (it's stuttering and sometimes I can't hear anything from it, same thing for the people I'm talking to, I'm stuttering hard for them). Temperatures seem somewhat normal, my GPU reaches 80 degrees in full load while Folding@home and my CPU reaches about 75 degrees in full load in these games. Therefore, I decided to run Cinebench R20 and I'm very dissatisfied with the score, because when I looked up this CPU I found out that it should score around 1400. I should also mention that this problem started occurring some time after February of 2020, when, one morning, my PC just wouldn't boot up, the fans would briefly spin and then nothing. I had a friend come over with his PSU, connected it to my components, it booted just fine, then I switched back my PSU and it also booted. My PSU is an Inter-Tech Energon 650W, which I've read bad things about, but I'm not sure if it's actually the problem or not. Also, I've had some problems with my motherboard in the past, where it would underclock my CPU to 0.8 GHz and lock it there. To fix this I had to disable Intel Adaptive Thermal Monitor under CPU Features in my BIOS. With this many background issues, I can't figure out what could the problem of my low performance be. Has anyone experienced something similar or any other ideas about what the issue is? Sorry for the long post, thank you if you managed to read through it all or even just for checking out the thread! Stay safe. Stay healthy.

I'm sorry if this is a dumb question. I'm a bit new to the overclocking scene. Is this a good score and clock for this processer? Fixed 4.2Ghz Locked at 1.4v Edit: Just saw the Cinebench Sticky... sorry. Will look better next time.

Hi guys I recently build my first PC, so I wanted to get into overclocking to see what I could get to. I did a full core overclock to 4.3 ghz, and then Cinebench test got me lower scores than stock. I checked for thermal throttling during the test and none of that seemed to happen. Any idea what I am doing wrong? Thanks :)

Hey guys I've using my p52 and was curious how well my laptop can perform. And I tested cinebench r20 My laptops spec is CPU: i7 8850h GPU: quadro p3200 Ram: 32 And here are my result Right now my best approach to maximize the performance was pretty limited, since I dont know how to overclock on laptop, and I got no cooling pad. So I installed xtu and undervllted by 165 And gave turbo short max to 90w And my turbo was 88w (Originally it was 75for max and 55 for normal turbo) And to max my cooling skill I set my laptop like this (Should tried this before the spring) So my result went pretty sweet. My initial score was 2,232 And now I'm having score of 2,951 My temp stayed on 89 to 95 And my clock was stable at 3.8 You guys have better idea to boost my benchmarking?

I was wondering, what is the difference between CineBench R20 and CineBench R15?

Hello! Basically I have overclocked my i7 9700K to 5.2 GHz at manual 1.420 voltage. It seems stable but will have to stress-test it a lot more. Though one thing I have noticed is that I only get a multi core score of about 3700 in Cinebench r20... I have seen people getting over 4100 points with their i7 9700K at 5.2 GHz. Does anyone know what the problem might be? All feedback is appreciated! Thanks.

Hi Guys, I'm new to this forum so its nice to meet all of you. I have recently built a mini itx,here is my cpu, gpu and ram specs. CPU: i7 9700k GPU: 2070 Super Ram: 16 GB DDR4 Ram The reason I am posting this is because I am getting low cinebench scores. I wouldn't be worried if it was 10 +/- but my scores seem to be off by around 400 points on cinebench r15 and r20. Is there anything I might have done wrong or did I just receive a faulty CPU?

So i have a ASRock A320M-HDV R4.0 (AM4) and a Ryzen 5 1600 and go t (2459) as my cinebench score and i was wondering if this was normal. i have just built my first pc with it being this one and was also wondering what exact cpu could i upgrade to without having any issues with Mobo with the cpu tdp because i was wanting to upgrade to a ryzen 7 2900x and a rtx 2070 (current gpu is an xfx rx 580 4gb oc edition) and i was wanting to know if i was able to do these upgrades without having any issues

My ryzen 7 1800x doesn't get its full potential under full load. Yesterday I have let my cpu render a picture with 1-16 threads and my professor, my colleagues and me saw that these results weren't the usual and that there must be something wrong with my cpu. A friend of mine took my exact code for the picture which we render in java and he got a different, expected result on his 1-12 threads (pictures in attached files). My result: Y-Axis = the time it needed to render the picture in minutes, X-Axis = the number of threads used My mate's result: Expected outcome, he has a ryzen 5 2600 with 6 cores and 12 threads, he used my exact same code and got the expected result As you can see, the picture renders a lot faster when you compare 1 thread and 2 threads but it gets slower when I use 4-5 threads which makes no sense. 16 Threads is almost the same outcome as 2 threads which makes absolutely no sense. My mate however got the expected result, where the times are shorter, the more threads are being used. I benchmarked my cpu in cinebench r20. There will be pictures in the attached files of me showing the core temperatures, clock speeds and the cinebench result. It only reaches 69C on every core on 100% load which shouldn't be the case. It should reach at least 85C (I assume) and there must be something wrong. Thanks for every help I can get.

What is the most common R20 score for this cpu?

Hi, My Cinebench R20 score is 6775 - Multi-Core 478 - Single Core The expected score everywhere is around 7164(MC)/510(SC)... I dont know whats wrong with my PC...also idle CPU temp is around 47-53°c PC Specs: Motherboard : Asus TUF x570 (wifi) CPU : Ryzen 9 3900x (Using stock wraith prizm cooler) GPU : RTX 2060 Super Power Supply : Antec EA750G PRO 80 Plus Gold Certified 750 Watt Semi- Modular Gaming RAM : Corsair vengeance pro rgb 32GB (16x2) 3200 Mhz

I just don't understand what's wrong... Is it just CPU lottery? Temps are around 71C max according to Ryzen Master so shouldn't be thermal throttling, Does anyone know anything I could try? I've looked at plenty other reviews and they all get over 3500 and I can't even hit 3000 right now

Yeah so this just happened

Hey there, I've just built my first rig with the R3 3300x and my cinebench R20 score is way below what I've seen as what should be standard, out of the box multicore - 2500, 2600. I'm getting multicore score of: 2100 - 2200 (stock). single core: 460 Temperatures aren't pushing over 65 degrees C. - R3 3300x - MSI Mag B550 Mortar - G.Skill 16gb Trident Z Neo - 3600 (XMP enabled) - RX 5600 xt - NZXT x53 AIO - 650w silverstone PSU What's choking the stock performance? Overclocking at 4.4ghz i'm getting 2269 in multicore.

Right so when I set minimum cpu power to 99% and max to 100% (in cpu power management in the battery profiles) I seem to get the highest cinebench score(1334 R20) for my laptop chip i58250u( the cpu is locked at 3.34 GHz all the time in these settings) .But the gaming performance in anything other than CSGO is crap. FIFA menu stutters and the gameplay is even worse. GTA 5 struggles too. I usually get 60+ fps ( I have a MX150(4gb) and play on very low settings (1080p) in each game). But if I change both min and Max Power to CPU at 99% the gaming performance is peak for my machine (Dell Inspiron 7572). The clock speed is also at 1.60-1.7 GHz while the base clock of the machine is 1.8 GHz. Cooling is a non issue during either gaming or cinebench as I have a janky solution that doesn't allow CPU temps to go above 75 degrees or 80 at max. The laptop is also fully metallic so heat dissipation is quite good. I have not tweaked any of the Speed shift, Speed step or C state or power settings in the bios nor have I used Afterburner or any other software to tinker with the GPU clocks. Is this behaviour normal( the drastic drop in clock speed and performance (cinebench score can go as low as 715 without battery saver))? Or is it just laptops or Just dell?

Just wanted to run a Cinebench R20 test on my system and i couldn't trust my eyes. Considering that the currently highest score is 40527, according to this site: https://hwbot.org/benchmark/cinebench_-_r20/halloffame I guess I jumped that by far with my score: I want my trophy now. Thanks.

I have a Ryzen 7 2700X on a X470 Aorus Gaming 7 with 2×8 GB of 3600 MHz Corsair Vengeance Pro RGB RAM @ 3200 MHz. Today I was adjusting the RAM OC and I decided to install Cinebench R20 (latest version). I did some runs and I could believe what I was seeing: scores lower than a 4C/8T i7 7700K and incredibly lower than an older 8C/16T Ryzen 7 1700X (pic at the bottom). The strange thing is that with Cinebench R15 my scores are similar to what a Ryzen 7 2700X is supposed to give. This problem persists in single core too. What can I do?