Elliott Dyson

I doubt it, if they do have a wan show I have a feeling they'll be addressing suggestions made in lab transparency (among other things), given how the topic was created today of all days :). Plus, that simply isn't what the wan show is, it has to be live to work.

They ought to update their calendar then. Currently says it's on. Might help to change it to a 'possibly'

I believe integrating an upvote-like system (like Reddit's), for viewers to comment on such testing methods and ways of displaying/presenting results would be a great idea. Perhaps hosting a Reddit community for this might suffice, however, relying on external services is unreliable in the long run, so something like this would be better built into the forum (in my opinion). Doing such a thing would allow filtering out bogus comments, and boost opinions the community feels strongly about. Guidelines that appear on the landing page could include things like suggesting users weight their upvotes to suggestions that provide strong evidence for their suggestions. The stronger the evidence (e.g. peer-reviewed papers), the more willing you should be in considering upvoting that suggestion. Perhaps weightings could also be applied if users have proof of proficiency in a given area, such as higher education, years of working in the industry, etc., ... however, that would be something that would require experimentation before integration.

That would make sense. Thank you

Will LTT be doing another review of the A770? I would very much like to see how the card copes without smart memory access on a wider range of programs, particularly for me, Topaz Video Enhance AI. Or perhaps this is something Labs is more likely to cover? Perhaps another YouTube has already tested this? Thanks all! - Elliott Dyson, Elliott Designs (YouTube) - Specs: Ryzen 2700x, Tomahawk X570, 64GB DDR4 3200MHZ (custom timings), Gtx 750 ti (I know , hence me asking about the A770)

I'd heard of coil whine, never realised it was this though, but come to think of it- it does make sense. Thank you!

I know it's an old post mate. Just wanted to say I simply didn't understand how it works, and wasn't a "sensitive mess", but yeah, hopefully I will get to that point where people look up to what I do, it's time and effort, I understand that much. The thought process was seemingly ignorant, I understand that, but it was simply just misinformed. An episode not too long ago of WAN show helped sink it in for me, the more people making content around the same stuff, the more it makes everyone want to improve and better further. It's like with industry where intel stagnated due to the lack of competition, AMD became competitive again, and progress within the industry sped back up. That's the way I see it now anyways.

This is an odd one, pretty sure it's coming from my GPU, PC is super quiet and use it on an open test bench style case (essentially not enclosed, don't worry it's well grounded to the power supply, is away from any static causing devices/surfaces and is cleaned when needed with antistatic compressed air, the basic inert canned stuff, not the ionising kind). Nonetheless, because it's super quiet I notice other things from it super easily, one key thing, and a super strange one at that, is a sound I believe to be coming from the GPU when moving an object around the visual space in Fusion 360 and Solidworks, it's strange because it doesn't happen in other display environments for example in 3D printing slicing software like PrusaSlicer, etc. Just curious what the cause is, not necessarily a problem, I've just been intrigued for a while now and want to satisfy that curiosity. The noise is instantaneous and only happens whilst moving the object around in the 3D environment, immediately stops upon the mouse stopping moving. So, anyone know why this is? Thanks, Elliott

No, you're totally right. I also hadn't thought about it in that way. Honestly, I'd be happy if LTT can provide more knowledge to the community about speaker/audio related stuff. I feel like it's not a very well represented community by the big tech channels. Thinking back at it, I did word my initial question very poorly, I should have just asked people's opinions on it outright rather than biasing it to a single point (in this case the assumption of moving people away from smaller channels, which come to think of it is a rather stupid conclusion). So thank you!

Thank you. Makes total sense, no idea why I hadn't thought of that initially. That's why I asked the question. Cheers mate

That makes sense, thank you!

No need to be so rude. I wasn't saying that's what would happen, more asking what influence it may have if any. Just a harmless question that you clearly turned in your head into something negative. I've been watching LTT for many years, trust me, I'm a fan of what they do, but it's people like you that give bad rap to fan communities. Please try to be a bit nicer!

Hi, Owner of an incredibly small but growing channel here (Elliott Designs). My channel is based around loudspeaker design, audio system calibration, acoustic principles and testing, etc. How would channels like mine be effected by this big move? If LTT starts making this more detailed content, with as big as they are, are they removing traffic that would have gone to us smaller creators? Or something else, even the opposite perhaps? Thoughts?

I appreciate the help Mcneck but I had tried this and doing the things with the CMOS battery (As well as replacing the cmos batt with a new one), all with no luck though, but thank you.

Yeah, unfortunately it does. The only USB connectors that I needed to unplug were from the front IO and were USB 2.0. Didn’t make a difference when I tried it earlier, all of my tweaks have been done with them unplugged just in case.