This would be ideal. Though it costs almost double the 3080. Fair enough it has more than double the vram and resolution capability but I don't have that kind of doeee
I downloaded Special K and it doesn't work with Marvel's Avengers so I went ahead and tried downloading ProcessHacker but my Norton shut it down and removed it.
Not sure how you got it to work
Damn. Just played some Avengers and bumped up everything. It hit 11.07 gbs with maxed settings. Either this is the worst optimized game in the history of optimization or it's a sign of things to come.
Here's to hoping I win the lottery and can buy a 3090 lol
Seeing as I currently game in 4k, going down to 1440p and not being able to run next gen games, is hard for me to reconcile. I will think on it and consider your suggestion.
I see what you are saying. I just wonder how much refresh rate really matters for a gamer like me who mainly plays single player games. I think 40-60 fps feels plenty good especially if what i am looking at is incredibly immersive. Know what I mean?
Wow thank you for educating me on that. If what your saying is true and having RTX on will lead to 1080p levels of VRAM usage at 4k then oh boy I am excited!
Actually no, I don't have money. I had some savings that I used in conjunction with a hefty refund check to make it possible. It will probably take me months to save up for the 3080.
This is interesting. However the scaling also comes at a cost to resolution no? I have a 4k tv intend to make use of a lot going forward and I would hate to find out 12 or so months from now that the Vram on my 3080 is no longer enough for 4k ultra settings.