bluehillday

what are the chepeast ssds with dram cache (sata 2.5)?

tried both ways, same stuff

nothing on screen, monitor tries to detect the ports gets no signal at all, tried changing the hdmi cable and it's not the fault, neither the monitor

first time it happened during a restart after a windows update, pc restarts it is on, but gives no image, cpu fan ramp up a bit as well but no screen image. reset button doesn't work neither holding the power down and trying to shut it down. i have to turn of psu from the buttom wait 1 minute, turn it on and then start up the pc again. it happens as well when i just try to restart the pc manually. it seems like almost every time i try to retart pc i get this problem, everything that needs the pc to restart be it after a driver update or just manually restart. it's not the monitor because i've changed it in the mean time, can this be the PSU? i've tried loading bios default settings but same thing

this card has advertised clock boost speed at 2491mhz, but why is stress test found in default adrenalin amd software reporting 2724mhz clocks while running it? in performance-manual gpu tunning the default max clock is set to 2724 as well, are these 2 different types of parameters?

idk how that helps and it's relevant at all but here it is : b450m s2h gigabyte, crucial mx500 gb, 2x8gb ddr4 crucial at 3000mhz tried with default bios settings and it still shutdowns

i edited

so this card has an advertised boost clock of 2491mhz, but as i enter radeon the max frequency is acutally 2724 by default. why is that? are these 2 separate frequencies? so by default radeon adrenalin settings the system crashes/shutdown instantly after starting unengine superposition at 1080p extreme. in games it crashes as well, as it shutdown instantly. so i have to go to manual tuning - custom, advanced control enabled and set the clock from 2724 which is the default setting to 2450mhz and from 1150mv to 1080mv, so that the system doesn't shut down imediately. so i run unengine superposition and it runs untill the end scores around 4300 points which is somehow below average but judging by the underclock it is still fine, temps looks normal, games doesn't crash anymore. so is the psu at fault here? setting the max clock speed to 2491 from adrenalin manual tuning(which is the default specs of the card) causes shutdowns again, so it can't runt at that clock this card has 120/123 average/max power consumption with 249w 20ms spikes as reviewd by techpowerup yet this 450w psu should handle it yet it shutdowns i know it's an old PSU but still this is not a high wattage card. the psu has the needed 6+2 connecter other parts are a 5600g a ssd and ram, cpu cooler and no other devices that uses power from the psu so the total system power consumption should be under 250w under load

i don't think you understood my question. i didn't imply what you said. even if it's the minimum the monitor display, if the FPS goes below 60 it will be out of the freesync range yet not syncing the monitor refresh rate with the ingame FPS.

that seems like a pretty loose freesync range, will there be tearing if FPS go under 60?

it does both as it's g-sync certified but it only has the ''adaptive-sync'' option in the OSD

wdym? adaptive-sync is enabled from monitor's OSD as fabric default and VRR is on from amd adrenalin. i don't think there's a g-sync option in the monitor's OSD and i haven't tested it with a nvidia GPU

monitor turns off (black screen) for 2 seconds from time to time then comes back to normal when VRR is enabled and gaming. with freesync disabled it works without this issue. i've tried modifying the adaptive sync range throught CRR from native 48-144hz to up to 60-144hz and with no good. common problem or faulty model? anyone is aware of a fix? i've tried installing the monitor's driver as well, or reinstalling the amd gpu drivers.

if a monitor has adaptive-sync enabled from the OSD (fabric default is enabled) but the VRR is disabled from adrenaline software, wil the adaptive-sync still work?

Best value coolers by FAR atm are the silentiumpc spartan 5 / max. 160w/180w TDP rated , the only difference between these two is that the max has 2 extra heatpipes. but for a 65w-95w TDP cpu it should not be noticeble at all, maybe 1-2 degree C difference in stress tests. It's true that the id cooling 224 xt(23 euro) performs a little bit better than these 2 but mainly on 95w+ TDP rated CPU'S, also the spartan 5's cooler is far more silent and better quality than the 224 xt. at 1500rpm the spartan 5 is extremely silent and has also a MTBF of 100.000 hours. So btw, i used both the 224 xt and the 5 max and i think the 5 max is the superior choice when considering it's very low noise level at max RPM. At 1100-1200RPM was inaudible, and at 1500rpm it was still very silent, barely notice and it's a very pleasant sound(PC is 0.7m near). The 224 xt hits 1600-1650 rpm when the temps get to 60-65C and it's defenetely a loud cooler at those RPM's(even at 1050-1100rpm the sound is noticeble). in p95 small fft max heat test with the 5 max i hit 67C max and with the 224 xt 64C , this with a 5600g) but i think the thermal was applied incorectly when installing the 5 max (used preaplied thermal paste which is very poor quality and it was dry and unevenly spread, on the 224 xt i switch to some cooler master themal paste) In Europe you can get the spartan 5 for like 17 euro and the max for around 23euros. (i don't even think that the max worth the extra 5 euros for 65-95w TDP CPU's, the spartan 5 is more than good enough) Amazing value and performance for the price.