Hey guys,
Did some thinking and research. This still worries me for what Intel is offering eventhough it's faster in single-core performance.
AMD TR, 64 lanes: 4 x PCIe 3.0 x16 (x16, x16/x16, x16/x8/x16, x16/x8/x16/x8) INTEL i9, 44 lanes: If you install CPU with 44 lanes, PCIE1/PCIE2/PCIE3/PCIE5 will run at x16/x8/x16/x0 or x8/x8/x16/x8
If Intel would have had 48 lanes on their cpu's it would make a lot more sense I guess but this is just weird. I think they could've easily pull off
4 extra lanes to get 3 pcie ports running x16.
This is quite a limitation in GPU and other card expansions. Or am I understanding something wrong here?
I don't know how much lanes stuff like a thunderbolt card or m2 raid cards would occupy how are x0 slots being handled.
Through another path or something? I know lanes has to do with data bandwidth but I'm not an expert on these things.
Deal is, I definitely plan on getting 2 GPU's and possibly some other pci-e cards maybe even a third GPU in the future.
Also, ditch that thunderbolt requirement. As long as I have 10Gbe on the board it's fine.
Any thoughts or clarification on that from you guys?
Thanks for the help so far!