Jump to content

BryanY

Member
  • Posts

    8
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Awards

This user doesn't have any awards

BryanY's Achievements

  1. Given the extremely similar spec on 3700x and 3800x, i'd assume 3800x is just a better binned 3700x, which makes 3700x having very little headroom for overclocking. Aside from that, i think 3700x is the best bet for regular users, while 3800x and 3900x should be better for overclock users.
  2. So recently I've been searching for a set of ARGB fans that could have rainbow effects similar to the ones that Corsair LL-series fans with Corsair Link software, but I cant seem to find any, does anyone knows any other brands that do the same thing? So just to put it in words, most argb fans controller simply feeds the same rgb signals to all fans comnected, making all fans have the effect/color. (Similar to how a circuit having parallel light bulb, lighting up at the same time) Where corsair link allows effects like: a color going from fan1, then it jumps to fan2, then fan3 so on (treating a set of fans similar to a long serially connected RGB strip) I'm honestly surprised its that hard to find something like this.
  3. The HP EX920 is only 10$ extra, with wayyyyyyyy better performance tho...
  4. I'd swap that Crucial P1 to other MLC drive, QLC is a big disappointment
  5. to put it short Intel: Higher clock speed and single-core performance, higher fps in general. AMD: more cores, better multi-core performance, especially in video decoding/encoding and programming. Intel's fps over AMD is quite significant in lower resolution and lower quality setting. If you're into fps gaming, wants squeeze as much fps as you can, and going to use a high refresh rate monitor, go for Intel. However, the margin gets less significant as you go higher resolution, if you're planning on gaming in high resolution, AMD wouldn't be a bad choice for being cheaper and having better multi-core performance.
  6. I have 5 in and 3 out... In general just keep positive pressure and you're good.
×