Defcry

I was also interested in this some time ago and did some research and everything suggest it does support 10-bit indeed. According to screenshot from system info of MBP 2017. Field pixel depth: 30 bit (10 bit for each RGB)

Well they offer even more. You have the i7-7920HQ option in the full-packed 15 inch. But, these are the options for 13 inch without touch bar.

So, basically this proves it. +1.03% increase in bench is definitely not worth spending $300 more

Simply said, I was always in a believe that differences between i3 - i5 - i7 series is mainly based on number of threads and cache. But down below, there are two options of Macbook Pro CPUs one i5 the other i7, but according to information I found the difference is only in clock speed. It comes to me that i5 is quite a bargain then and very good option (considering it is $300 cheaper) and only lacking 0.2 GHz base clock speed and 0.4 GHz Turbo, while maintaining same cache, threads, cores count and hyper-threading. What do you think guys? Am I correct? A.) i5 - 2.3 GHz / Turbo 3.6 GHz (should be Intel Core i5-7360U) B.) i7 - 2.5 GHz / Turbo 4 GHz (should be Intel Core i7-7660U) + $300 Both options should feature the same features: 2 cores, 4 threads, hyper-threading, 4mb cache.

I am curious whether there are some benefits of having both AMD branded GPU and CPU instead of using for example 7700K and Vega 64. I have recently bought monitor with AMD freesync and thus I will also opt out for AMD gpu for my coming rig upgrade, I am just curios whether there are any advantages to make this kind of synergy and use both AMD units? Thank you.

Prestigio headset, and anything prestigio.