Jump to content

joshua_p_

Member
  • Posts

    40
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Awards

This user doesn't have any awards

Contact Methods

  • Twitch.tv
    joshua_p_

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Californyeah
  • Occupation
    computery stuff

System

  • CPU
    Intel i7-7820X
  • Motherboard
    EVGA FTW-K X299
  • RAM
    16GB Corsair Dominator DDR4 3200
  • GPU
    EVGA GTX 1080 FTW DT ICX
  • Case
    Phanteks Enthoo Pro-M
  • Storage
    500GB Samsung 960 EVO NVMe SSD + 1TB HDD (RAID 0)
  • PSU
    EVGA SuperNOVA 850 G3
  • Display(s)
    ASUS MG248Q 144Hz 1080p, Dell 27" LED QHD G-Sync 144Hz 1440p
  • Cooling
    EVGA CLC 280
  • Keyboard
    Corsair K95 Platinum RGB
  • Mouse
    Razer Death Adder Chroma
  • Sound
    HyperX Cloud II and Avid USB interface driving Tannoy 6 Monitors
  • Operating System
    Win 10

Recent Profile Visitors

277 profile views

joshua_p_'s Achievements

  1. yuck, that evga cooler looks like something from the mid 2000's. Clear plastic and a TON of fins..... last gen coolers looked much nicer, that just looks cheap.
  2. Just finished a new build for the living room!

    IMG_0057.thumb.jpg.dafc3ce076427cf292bbee810b460806.jpg

    IMG_0046.jpg

     

     

     

     

    IMG_0052.jpg

    IMG_0045.jpg

  3. Havent seen that article but will lok for it. I think Intel was hedging their bets on A. the big box builds who want to sell better performance and save a buck (as mentioed above) and B. gamers who want all of their shtuff on a single big fat HDD, which is few of us at this point. if this tech was here a few years ago as a bridge to SSD it may have worked better. I would bet there are future implementations (even with firmware updates) that may unlock more potential for non boot or even raid array configs, but until that happens this seems pretty niche.
  4. ahh there it is. i missed that chart. no backwards compatibility for older chipsets, no non boot performace boost, ro real boost to SSD's, and no raid support.... now i really dont get the point of optane at all. Thanks Intel
  5. Linus's review is specifically about boot drive performance (SSD boot w/Optane and HDD boot w/Optane) and it seems most of Intel's documentation is about performance increases in boot times, application launches, etc. It seems Optane is more targeted at drives that have predictable read/write requests like a system drive. My question is more specifically about secondary drive performance (non boot performance and non application performance). Say I am editing video or audio on my secondary drive pool. Will I see any performance increase? Do RAID config see any significant increase? I guess what I am asking is more along the lines of: Does Optane increase performance in mixed SSD + HDD multi-drive systems?
  6. So I have a 500 GB SSD system drive plus two 1TB mechanincal 3.5" Drives in RAID 0 for media storage and overflow application storage. All of the tests I've seen for Optane show how it affects performance for mechanical system drives, brining them up to "near" ssd performance. My question is to whether a system config like mine would show any significant performance increase on my secondary drive pool, and how well Optane works with RAID arrays. Any Ideas, or reviews seen on this?
×