Jump to content

Bezolek

Member
  • Posts

    48
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Bezolek

  1. 11 hours ago, rotexen said:

    if you have to choose between those monitors you mentioned the LG is the winner

    its a good budget monitor 1440p IPS panel with wide color gamut and good picture quality

    I dont have to choose between any of this monitors. I just did some research and a lot of reviewers said that that models were good ( idk if they were honest ).

    48 minutes ago, Andrewtst said:

    Definitely this is my choice from the 3 model provided. 

    Is it better to buy IPS monitor or VA for 50/50 gaming and content consumption ( Youtube ect )?
    Does really good VA panel looks better than avarage IPS? And also how much good VA monitor costs? ( I'm asking those questions because Odyssey G6 look pretty good on paper, HDR 600, freesync pro, 240HZ and DPC 93% for around 400$ )

     

  2. Hi, I have 4 drives, one m.2 with windows 10, two HDD and one sata SSD. 3 days ago a power shortage happend. I lost like 3TB of data spread on my 2x1TB HDD and 1TB SATA SSD. I recovered 1.2TB of data. And for the past two days my PC worked fine. But now, I turned it on and windows could detect only only that m.2 drive. Once again i lost all of my data on the other drives. Do you have some ideas what is the issue here?
    MOBO X570 gigabyte elite
    CPU r7 3700x
    PSU SilentiumPC FM2 750W 80 Gold

    All of mu drives have 100% health on crystal disk info.

  3. Hi, so recently I upgraded my rig to r7 3700x, rtx 2060 msi, 2x8GB Corsair  3600MHz CL18 Vengeance RGB. But something strange occurred. My RAM usage is waaay off. My user uses only 3GB, but windows shows ( and other programs ) that 80% (sometimes even 95% ) of my RAM capacity is used. I can't lunch any new AAA games like Bordelands 3 cuz of my memory issue. Could you guys help me? 
    Here are some screenshots: https://imgur.com/a/j1jZtIz

  4. 8 hours ago, GamerDude said:

    Look through the motherboard list on top, then make up your mind. Fyi, the Pro is listed as higher tier vs the Gaming-F. Btw, have you already gotten the 3900X? From what I've gathered, it's pretty hard to find.

    In Poland most of people can't afford r9, so it's easy to find here. I've waited like 4 days for it.

  5. 10 minutes ago, Princess Luna said:

    Not really, it's actually worse. I would get a R5 3600 and that's it since most games don't use 8 cores and maybe just maybe they will start to use it by 2021 because of the new console generation it still matters that 12 cores surpasses it and then as always the only way to keep increasing your gaming performance is through faster cores.

     

    This means that even by 2022 games, mostly just the triple A ones, will be octa-core depended and you'll see the R7 3700X still gaming the exact same as the R9 3900X with the i9 9900K still coming on front.

     

    So the true logical solution is cheap up now and get a Zen 3 or Intel 10nm here in 2 or 3 years that will perform far greater in games. Future proof is always an illusion. You cannot realistic stay on the edge for 8 years by buying the most expensive consumer hardware there is, it's not how it works.

    Last cpu ( i5-4670 )  lasted for 8 years, and I could play most of tripleA games at medium. So what would you recommend me to buy for 2500$? That ryzen 7 3700x, 2070super and 16GB 3600mhz ram.I would love to play some VR games and cyberpunk at ultra settings.Or that 2500$ would be a overkill for this tasks?

  6. 7 minutes ago, Princess Luna said:

    What monitor are you going for? as in display settings?

     

    You see the R9 3900X games the same as a R5 3600 which costs far less, the R9 3900X is a content creation, professional workload CPU not a gaming processor, there's no true gains from a gaming perspective by using it over the much cheaper R5.

     

    It is recommended to look if you can find discounted i7 9700KF and alike which does provide superior gaming performance.

     

    The RTX 2080 Super also brings very little extra performance facing the RTX 2070 Super and RTX 2080 vanilla to where it's a bad money management to consider it... to an extend you either go all in with the RTX 2080 Ti or then get the better value half the price RX 5700XT / RTX 2070 Super... the RTX 2080 Super is kinda on a dead end.

    1440p, 144hz. 

    I agree with you that intel would be better. However, it's more likly to upgrade GPU rather than CPU, so I think spending more on CPU(with more cores) is better now. I planned to buy one expensive machine for  6/8 years, and just upgrade GPU. 

     

    In the long run 12/24 would be much better than intel's 8/8. Especially when games are starting to use more cores. 

  7. 3 minutes ago, Princess Luna said:

    And now you're putting together a very expensive high end system you shouldn't put at risk with a mediocre PSU.

     

    What are you even going to do with this computer? because if the main focus is gaming you might want to rethink this match.

    I have like 2500$ saved to spend on pc. I would mostly game on it. 

  8. 1 minute ago, Princess Luna said:

    Who's everyone?

     

    The PSU has no protection for overload and over-temperature on the 12V rail so yeah it's simply not a PSU you pair with a R9 3900X and 2080 Super... simple as that.

    It was 2y ago, my old PSU died. My budet was limited so I bught what I could aford. It was very popular PSU back then. 

  9. Hi, I'm going to upgrade my PC. Ryzen 7 3700x, rtx 2060, 3600mhz cl 18 16GB ddr4. What motherboard should I buy under 200$? I've read  a lot of reviews but all of them recommend different mobo.

    It's better to buy high end b450 ( Gaming -f ) or spend all of my budget on the new x570?

     

     

    EDIT. I took Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE.

×