Jump to content

kkpdk

Member
  • Posts

    3
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Awards

This user doesn't have any awards

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I wonder how much of this is the users of content ID ignoring what it says on the tin, and how much is youtube: What we have here is someone, 'player T', producing a piece of software that produces 'software visuals'. T then non-exclusively licenses it to two other players, 'A' and 'B'. A and B now hold rights to the software visuals, but they do not hold exclusive rights. Then players A and B record videos yapping about about what they observe. The resulting videos contain two components: The yapping, and the software visuals. They hold exclusive rights to the yapping. They can upload their videos just fine, since they hold non-exclusive rights to the remainder. So, do they hold exclusive rights to all of the video contents? Now read youtube's 'Qualifying for Content ID', and I can see why this might be happening.
  2. The ends of a network link will attempt to work at the speed they are configured for (if configured/configurable), or autonegotiate to the highest common speed. If the electrical performance of the link between the parties is not good enough, you get errors. Very rarely do I see switches drop down to a lower speed, and when they do, it is usuallly 10Mbps. The switches only see the electrical performance on the link, not what is printed on the components: I have a bit of experience with running networks on old cabling. Work has ~40 switches, and the edge cabling and termination that goes with that, all cat5 from the 10Mbps era. Not cat5e, plain old cat5. The 1000BASE-T spec allows gigabit on cat5, and it does work, but with no margin for maximum length runs. cat5e has (from memory) stricter crosstalk specifications, with leads to some margin. As Xineas notes, as far as the 8P8C connector goes, the 'cat6' one accomodates thicker wires, which in turn allow higher PoE power limits. As far as actually crimping it onto a cable is concerned, I find that a tightly-twisted cat5e connector on cat5e cable will run 10Gbps, whereas a cat6 one with the twist of the cat6 cable unwound too far will give me errors. So take care and make pretty terminations, they matter. If you find yourself in a situation where you are running 1Gbps on cat5 (not 5e), or 10Gbps on cat5e (which is not officially an option, as the cat5e requirements are not strict enough), I very strongly recommend some level of management on the switches. Without it finding that defective link becomes impossible.
  3. I am more a coder than a gamer, with a 3-monitor setup on an aging 3570K, and am looking at upgrading to 4K displays. I need something to drive those, preferably dedicated, because right now the integrated graphics causes a 30% performance hit. And as this is a Linux box, and I do kernel things, AMD's approach to Linux support is appealing. There is also a handful of haswell boxes under my table, but nothing really as nice as the fully pimped 3570K box.
×