TMS

Their official statement was that the full speed of the connection could only be achieved by using the network from multiple devices and I do not have any further information about what this exactly means.

You can buy an envelope (and probably paper) in Hungary in the post office and it's not that expensive either to get proof when the recipient gets it.

Nice to have, because I don't need it. I don't host services from home, so I'm not affected by the disadvantages of a dynamic IP. It's not a huge deal to most people. It's nice to have, because I didn't have a situation in years when a static IP would have been better for me. As for privacy, I do not send emails containing that sensitive data. And if I had such important data, I surely won't choose email to deliver it.

Could you tell me if the delivery of an email is so important, why don't you use snail mail instead?

No, I wouldn't, since for me, static IP is a nice-to-have. I'm fine without it, since I don't host a server or any service from home.

I send pictures on Messenger, email, etc. Google Drive has a 5TB/file limit, which is ridiculous. BTW, couldn't you just fake the log then?

Well, if it is your hobby, then a static IP is surely better for you. For me, it's most of the time useless.

I don't personally think that most people would need a personal web or even a mail server. People want easy solutions, not this stuff. And I don't think public MSPs' privacy is that bad right now. I see your point, but these things I think are irrelevant for most people. I never had a situation in my life where a line of a log file would have been a better evidence than showing the email on my phone that it was sent. And if they want to send a file, they put it up on a cloud storage service, like OneDrive or Google Drive. Or if it's something that violates those services' terms, they use P2P.

We spend the EU money on other unreasonable things, but I won't go in politics.

Yes, I know the prices, it's not cheap. Although I don't think you'd be paying less than 60 a year for running your computer 24/7.

I've only used a few for a short time, so I can't give you a proper answer to that. Your points are valid, but as I said, I don't think there is even 1% of the people here care this much about their privacy. They are just fine with Gmail or some local MSPs. Besides, most people can't afford a server or want to save a few on not running their computers 24/7.

Well, I guess you are the 1% here who would do that. Others would just simply rent these services for cheap at a hosting provider. Or if they really care about privacy, place their servers in a datacenter.

They can use DynamicDNS. And as I mentioned, these are residential subscriptions, I don't think much people buy servers to run them off from their home connection.

I can't imagine a scenario except hosting a game/webserver from your home where you would be in a disadvantage against people who have static IPs.

Why would you consider a connection with dynamic IP half a connection?

As far as I know you can only get a static IP at either ISP if you are their customer as a company. Although on some of their technologies, for example DOCSIS, the IP rarely changes. For Digi, I don't have a guess. I'm currently at Digi where I live, but I just didn't care about a static IP since then. People here mostly use these bandwidths for piracy, not for hosting servers and stuff.

https://www.telekom.hu/about_us/press_room/press_releases/2017/october_31 (English Press release from Telekom Hungary) https://www.hwsw.hu/hirek/57994/telekom-gigabit-internet-gbps-savszelesseg-letoltes-feltoltes.html (Hungarian article) From Telekom's English press release: A little more than a year ago one of the ISPs in Hungary (Digi) started to offer gigabit internet options for cheap (less than $20). Another one (Telekom HU) started to provide a gigabit subscription a year ago too in response and now it's providing a new subscription with a maximum download speed of 2 Gbit/s. Hungarian quote from the Hungarian Article: The same quote translated to English: So in response to the higher maximum bandwidth, Digi responded with only providing their largest, gigabit subscription to new customers, at least on their FTTH (Fiber To The Home) network. I have checked some addresses, where I know they provide internet service, and this is true, although they still provide smaller subscriptions on some addresses on their FTTB (Fiber To The Building) network. I've made a little table showing some of the offers of the 2 companies. Prices can be different in other regions, especially at Telekom. I think this is because Digi is a smaller company and they built most of their own network, meanwhile Telekom has the largest overall availability in the country, with variable technologies and available subscription offers. This is mostly due to Telekom (as far as I know) is renting some of their parts of their network from local, really small ISPs. I included guaranteed speeds, although it's usually not an issue for ISPs here to provide the maximum speeds they advertise. Digi Telekom DIGINET 1000 FTTH DIGINET 500 FTTB DIGINET 100 FTTB OTTHONI INTERNET 2000 OTTHONI INTERNET 1000 OTTHONI INTERNET 250 OTTHONI INTERNET 100 OTTHONI INTERNET 50 Maximum Download Speed 1000 500 100 2000 1000 250 100 50 Maximum Upload Speed 200 200 100 500 200 20 10 5 Guaranteed Download Speed 300 200 25 300 300 15 1 1 Guaranteed Upload Speed 50 50 20 50 50 4 1 1 Price (HUF/USD, 27% VAT included, without loyalty programs) 3300 HUF/~$12.5 2900 HUF/~$11 2500 HUF/~$9.5 11631 HUF/~$43.5 6659 HUF/~$25 5816 HUF/~$22 5057 HUF/~$19 4467 HUF/~$17

Okay, so: The problem was that I had AI Suite 3 installed, because I could not set the fan speeds in BIOS properly. For some reason it kept the voltage on 1.246V, which turned out is the voltage when turbo 4.4 GHz is on, even tough turbo was turned off. I uninstalled it and run an official cleaner, now the voltage is maximum 1.083 and the temps are fine. I attached a screenshot from the results of a 15 minute Aida64 stress test. Thanks all for the help!

Asus Z97-K. Turns out Vcore is set to 1.073 in BIOS.

I use default BIOS settings for pretty much everything, but I'll do it, thanks.

Of course, cleaned the old paste and put new on it, checked for dust under the fans in the heatsink, but it was okay. Like it was half covered once when I had AMD with dust, but I didn't see any performance issues with it then. Although I will reseat it again.

They even have a cooler named Matterhorn.

No, I didn't overclock, I only turned off turbo, left anything untouched. The voltage is around 1.246V under the stress test. I cleaned the heatsink about a month ago. The problem with the Kraken x41 is that my case (HAF XB) only supports a 120mm radiator at the back, or a 240mm radiator at the front. From the price of the Kraken x41, I could buy a Corsair Hydro H100i V2, or a Cooler Master Nepton 240M with 240mm radiators. Would they perform better with larger radiators against the Kraken?

Hello! Recently I upgraded to a 4790k from an AMD FX-6200. I use an Alpenföhn Brocken air cooler on the CPU, which I used when I had AMD too. It performs better than the stock cooler, but even with turbo off, the CPU can easily reach 90+ Celsius on cores after a few seconds of Aida64 stress test and starts throttling. During games it can reach around 80 degrees on most AAA titles. I'm new to Intel CPUs and water cooling, so I really don't know what cooler should be fine for me and the whole Intel-like thermals (if this behavior applies to other Intel CPUs too) is a new thing for me. Like on AMD, I had cooler core temperatures than the 'CPU' temperature reported in monitoring programs (it's now around 50 when the cores are at 90+ Celsius). I don't know what type of AIO should I get, because I don't even know if a cooler with smaller radiator (like Cooler Master Seidon 120V ver.2) would be enough, or only some larger (and more expensive) 240mm ones. Can somebody help me with this?