Jump to content

sondern

Member
  • Posts

    9
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Awards

This user doesn't have any awards

About sondern

  • Birthday Jun 21, 2002

Contact Methods

  • Discord
    187927438951579648
  • Steam
    http://steamcommunity.com/id/sondern
  • Origin
    SondernFPS
  • Reddit
    https://www.reddit.com/user/daffaromero
  • Twitch.tv
    https://www.twitch.tv/sondernbtw
  • Twitter
    https://twitter.com/sondernbtw

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Interests
    Computers, Phones, Gaming
  • Biography
    Yeet!
  • Occupation
    Uni student

System

  • CPU
    AMD Ryzen 5 3600
  • Motherboard
    MSI B550-A Pro
  • RAM
    2x8GB DDR4-3200 CL16 Corsair Vengeance LPX
  • GPU
    MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Gaming X Trio
  • Case
    Corsair 275R Airflow
  • Storage
    Western Digital Caviar Blue SN550 500GB NVMe SSD, Western Digital Caviar Blue 1TB SATA3 HDD
  • PSU
    Silverstone ST65F-GS 650W 80 Plus Gold
  • Display(s)
    LG 24GN600 24" 1080p 144Hz, ASUS VP228HE 22.5" 1080p 60Hz
  • Cooling
    Silverstone PF240-ARGB AIO
  • Keyboard
    Redragon K552W-RGB TKL
  • Mouse
    Endgame Gear XM1R White
  • Sound
    Audio-Technica ATH-M50xMG
  • Operating System
    Windows 10 Pro
  • Phone
    Apple iPhone Xs 64GB

Recent Profile Visitors

532 profile views

sondern's Achievements

  1. PC specs are: Ryzen 5 3600, 16GB DDR4-3200, and RTX 3060 Ti. The game runs just fine without shaders and I can get somewhere around 150-200 fps. With shaders like BSL and SEUS Renewed and I average around 40-60 fps. Does that number seem low or is it performing as it should? Render distance is set to 8 chunks, and FOV is set to 100. Minecraft version 1.17.1, I have OptiFine installed. The game is running at 1920x1080. Latest NVIDIA driver installed, latest BIOS update installed. I've included screenshots with multiple shaders: SEUS Renewed, BSL, Continuum, and Sildur's Vibrant (Medium).
  2. Yeah. Was surprised about its actual performance.
  3. Review: Genius NetScroll 120 Hello everyone. I have this, really cheap, widely used (in my country) mouse. I thought, after using it for about 3 months, "Hey, let's do a review on this." So, this is it. Bought this mouse back in December 2015, but only started using it at around January this year. My father used it for a while before switching to another mouse. Before proceeding, I just want to let you know that most internet cafes around here use this mouse, because, well, it's extremely cheap. Oh, and, did I mention that it's cheap? SPECIFICATIONS Supports Windows 98SE onwards Utilizes 1(one) USB 1.0 or PS/2 port Optical sensor, 800 CPI resolution Ambidextrous (All quoted from the official website with translations) FIRST IMPRESSIONS Box? What box? Packaging wise, I didn't like it. At all. The cardboard box the mouse comes in is bad. So, I just ripped the box apart and poof, it went flying to the trashcan. The mouse itself feels as cheap as it actually is. It's pretty light, and looks office-y (Is that even a word? I don't care). Cable is pretty long, and--even at first glance--looks like it's going to to rip apart any time now. THE MOUSE Let's talk mouse. As I mentioned before, it's pretty light (Unfortunately I didn't have a scale ready at my disposal at the time). The mouse is made entirely out of plastic, that feels like it has an actual thickness in it, but at the same time, prone to breaking. The left and right clicks are light enough for me to quickly double click, but not light enough I would accidentally press it all the time. The scroll wheel is made of plastic and is rubber coated. It isn't slippery (MY GOSH) and the steps are surprisingly defined. Also, there's so little function embedded in. It only has left click, right click, scroll, and middle click. That's it. Nothing more. But, I guess, given the price (US$2!) it's fair enough. Mouse feet? Plastic. Slippery, slippery, plastic. More information for you readers, I broke the scroll wheel by dropping it from 1 meter high accidentally. How about the cable? Just your average thin cable that slacks (and tangles) around a lot. To sum that up, the mouse is okay. Not horrible, but okay. THE PERFORMANCE The website claims an 800 CPI optical sensor. I can't verify the resolution, so I'd leave it like that. The acceleration is pretty massive, I'll tell you. The lift-off distance is pretty low, at around 2 millimeters high. The sensor actually feels pretty acurate to where I moved my mouse to. The cursor corresponds nicely with the mouse. Keep in mind that I use this mouse on a wood and/or ceramic surface. It's not bad during gaming, primarily Battlefield 4, Battlefield Bad Company 2, and Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, but it feels like it can be more precise and slightly more (accurate?). Overall, I actually enjoy gaming on this mouse, except for the part where it's kind of slippery because of the really minimum rubber usage. FYI, I grip my mice with a claw grip. It's also pretty comfortable for extended usages, just watch out for your sweats as they may drip in the gaps between the buttons, the scroll wheel, and the mouse body. CONCLUSION Oh, you're still here? Great! Tell you what, this mouse is okay. For it's price tag of US$2, falling into entry level office segment, it's actually not as bad as I thought it'd be. Decent. Good enough. Well, I guess that wraps up my very first review, and also marking my first post on the LinusTechTips forum. Thank you all for reading my small review. Goodbye and I'll hopefully see you again (Well, I can't actually SEE you, but eh) on my next review. Cheers! P.S. Here's some pics. Taken with a Nexus 5, with horrible lighting.
  4. Nice. Probably better quality pictures next time. Also, tell us about how the mouse feels in your hand, the sensor, and whatnot. Still, for your first review, it's honestly not bad. Keep 'em up. You got potential, my friend.
×