Kookieman
-
Posts
37 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Kookieman's Achievements
-
Got it.. Used SMB4k and mounted that way. For some reason a normal SMB mount command was not doing the trick.
-
Got a few websites that run off of a Windows server, can't move them to an Apache server, and can't rely on FTP as multiple users are editing at the same time. In Windows with Visual Studio, we can see other peoples changes happen in real time. Great. But I want to use Linux. I have Visual Studio Code installed on my KDE instance, but when I open folder, there is no way to just type in the address like you can in windows. I can access the files via dolphin, I installed Samba and tried to mount the SMB share that way, it still wont show up when opening folder. Does anyone know how to accomplish this? I'm trying to ditch Windows, and this is a huge hurdle for me.. Also, I'm not attached to KDE, if anyone knows of a distro that does this with less issues let me know. Thanks!
-
I will post a diagram when I get the chance. Thank everyone so much for helping.
-
Okay, the only reason I ask is because I've never dealt with BGP before. Just know of it. But I hear its way faster than STP and even RSTP. Do I need to have a device on the far end that can do BGP to achieve this? Or can I have a Cisco on the close end, and just use the UBNT radios routing capabilities after that? I would assume if I routed the IPs on all my links to the far end, my Cisco would send packets where they need to go, but coming back concerns me. I dont think UBNT has an option for BGP (at least not that Ive found). I might just be screwed coming back because the UBNT radio would just send out its GW. (Welcome to confused)
-
I don't know if I came to the wrong place. But every other forum out there just kinda sucks. So right now, I'm running a WISP network with multiple P2P Bridges feeding towers for redundancy. I am using STP on tough switches (going to be switching them to Netonix) for the redundancy portion of this. To reduce overhead, Im thinking about putting my bridged links in router mode, and routing the traffic through, forcing packets to use a link based on the route in the routers, but then that would require me to reroute data if a link went down. Could I use BGP to handle the weight of an IP and where it goes, then if it fails have it pick the other link? Or should I just stick with STP and bridge mode and call it a day? Side note, I would just use Vlans on the tough switches along with cost and priority to achieve less overhead, but Tough switches kind of suck when it comes to CPU and memory. When I tried that, my throughput was cut in 3/4ths ... like 30 Mb on a 100 Mb link.
-
No like the link actually worked. Lol Thats exactly what I was looking for. I wasn't being sarcastic.
-
Thanks Stevoisboss
-
That link, is awesome. Thank you.
-
I didn't know if the x models would work out the same. And you kinda threw a first punch with your Google line up there. But thanks. I did not know that the die was the only diff.
-
It says 390x... Did you not get the memo?
-
EK releases MSI® RADEON™ R9 390X GAMING 8G Full-Cover water block
-
Well I found a couple via google. But does anyone have any suggestions then? The ones I came across look a bit shady to me. Im not going to spend money on something that doesnt do what I want it to. Like cmon...
-
Or, I could get a bunch of results showing R9 390x blocks. But that's cool. Thx.
-
Okay, so Google has failed me again. My MSI R9 390 has got to be the loudest thing I have ever heard. EVER. This thing is seriously a hair dryer. So I'm looking for a way to water cool it. It's a pretty big card, its pretty popular, but its almost if no one wants to water cool the thing. Everything I found was for the 390x, but since I'm not a water cooling or GPU guru, I don't know if any 390x blocks would work. If anyone knows of anything, please let me know. I'm okay with AIO, but not those weird half air half water cooled things that NZXT make. Thanks in advance!
-
To make things harder... They need to be PWM fans...
