TessellatedGuy

A quick google search on "15v at 2.6a usb charger" gave me this top result, meaning many people are asking for the same thing: http://www.theverge.com/circuitbreaker/2017/2/23/14715566/nintendo-switch-best-battery-pack-charging-cables http://www.nintendolife.com/forums/nintendo-switch/nintendo_switch_usb-c_and_portable_battery_recommendations While none of the suggested ones output 15v at 2.6a, most people are are recommending those as your best bet. However I found this battery pack (Not that portable) on amazon that MIGHT support the switch. It's pretty dang expensive though: https://www.amazon.com/BiXPower-BP220-Capacity-60300mAh-Rechargeable/dp/B00ICA03D4. Your best bet is to wait for the release and wait for people to give their expert opinions on which is the best charger for the switch before buying anything.

Thanks for the reply. I've got game dvr turned off in the first place so that's a no go. I also checked gpu usage and found that moving my mouse causes gpu usage spikes from 95% usage to 75-90% usage and it goes up and down that way until I stop moving my mouse which helps it go back to a stable usage. Keep in mind I'm not moving the camera in game to a whole different direction, I just move my mouse in very small circles while looking at the same direction, so I don't think this fps drop should exist.

Hello, I noticed that framerate would drop pretty hard while playing some games when I look around or move my mouse. So I decided to test out many games and found that this happens only in CPU intensive games, like Battlefield 1 and Watch dogs 2 (I assume it's cpu intensive because it's got the same effect). In games like GTA 5, Shadow warrior 2, or Witcher 3, the game runs perfectly even when moving my mouse. I did some more testing and found that the fps drop amount decreases as my framerate becomes lower, it's really weird. For example: In battlefield 1 campaign, I get 120 fps while looking at a certain point and when I move my mouse it drops to about 95-105 fps so about 20 fps is decreased by just moving the mouse, now as I play at 200% resolution scaling and TAA on game gets pretty demanding and my framerate comes down to about 40-70, so when I move my mouse then, I get an fps drop of only 6 tops (And even lower drops when it's below 60 fps, about 2-4 fps tops). Same thing happens in watch dogs 2 in CPU intensive areas like the middle of the city. However, lowering polling rate obviously fixes this but as you can tell that's not a good solution for someone who plays a fast paced first person shooter like battlefield 1. The thing is.... I've got an i5 4690K overclocked to 4.5Ghz (I've tried default bios without overclock too), which should easily handle any polling rate I throw at it (Or maybe it doesn't?). I've heard that polling rate isn't a problem for CPUs to handle nowadays, especially a beefy CPU like mine. I've tried everything from BIOS updates, to clean boot, to DPC latency checking using latencymon (Latency there seems to be fine, only reaching the slightly brown area), to motherboard chipset drivers, to USB drivers for my logitech G502, to even clean installing my graphics driver and downgrading it. None of them do anything. Is this something I should worry about or is this normal? I really want to fix this and can't accept lowering polling rate as a solution. There MUST be something wrong somewhere else. Specs:GTX 1070i5 4690K16 gb dual channel DDR3 ADATA ramWindows 10 2TB+1TB Toshiba 7200rpm drivesGigabyte Z97X Gaming 3 motherboard. If there's any more info you want just ask me! Thanks. EDIT: I'll also add that moving my mouse causes gpu usage to spike down from 95% to 75%-90% in the games that I tested containing the fps drop and the usage goes back to being stable when I stop moving my mouse. Moving the camera with a controller has no effect on fps though. So this is strictly a mouse problem I think.

Yea, I'm gonna need the excalibur V2, a VERY cheap membrane keyboard with a G502 proteus core isn't a good match. AND it will be a good birthday gift as 3/11 is my B'day!

I currently DON'T at all own an SSD. Which is pretty bad for the standard of my PC (1200$ build but no SSD. I mean WHAT?). I really didn't care about SSDs as I wanted that sweet sweet processor and gpu performance ............................... Did a BIG mistake. Ofcourse I could buy one, but as you can see, I don't really have the money to buy an SSD after a 1200$ PC build. I would be glad if I could win one. I would recommend people to get an SSD (if what people claim about SSDs are true) at all costs because I was pretty surprised from benchmarks all around the internet.