Jump to content

Big-G

Member
  • Posts

    722
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Big-G

  1. Because SteamVR only reads the serial and reports the stock speed of CPU's.... it doesn't even check the current clock speeds...
  2. *Clicky baity title... I'd like to see available BT 5.0 products... thanks...
  3. Because they actually figured out how to driver?
  4. Remember, all current 10x0 benchmarks are being done on fairly immature drivers... driver maturity will increase performance a lot more...
  5. Big-G

    1080 Ti?

    Until they have made enough profit from the 1080 while waiting for AMD to bring out the Vega competition... then they will respond "appropriately" with the new 1080Ti... Based on AMD's eagerness to compete in the high-end level to date... don't expect it before end of the year.
  6. Quoting the Jay on VideoCardz's comments: http://videocardz.com/61121/asus-and-msi-accused-of-sending-modified-cards-to-the-press#comment-2734774584
  7. They are available as downloads, so not like they are not "available"...
  8. 99.6%... smooth like butter... http://www.3dmark.com/fsst/7327
  9. Weird, just did a search, that didn't come up... O well..
  10. Our prayers for a Firestrike based stress testing solution seems to have been answered... now you can run the graphics test in loops and still score a stability score http://videocardz.com/61107/futuremark-releases-3dmark-fire-strike-stress-test Did the test myself... 99.6% stability... Smooth like butter... http://www.3dmark.com/fsst/7327
  11. Cause it makes the joke so much funnier on AMD fans... as I've paid my price a couple of years ago... where was the $200 card then? Mkay.... I'll stop now
  12. Your "we" isn't required at the high spec level...
  13. Do you see "Nvidia Control Panel" when you right click on the desktop?
  14. That's because want is sometimes a stronger driver than need...
  15. Funny how Nvidia's blamed for high prices, but we want their products and there's no alternative... It's because AMD fails to compete at the level we want that Nvidia can dictate the prices. Competition at the high end will bring prices down. Nvidia is doing what any company without any competition and high demand will do... allow the prices to climb. Economics 101... It's not Nvidia being bad... they are following the law of competition... AMD's the one that's lost the fight.
  16. At the moment, based on known clock speeds, I'd vote for the Asus ROG Strix 1080...
  17. I can't really comment on price, as 4770K's are scarce in my area. Any mobo using a Z87 or Z97 chipset will work. I'd say so... I've got one running at 4.2GHz... and it's not missed a beat once. PS: Added to say... I'm running games like FC Primal and Fallout 4 without a problem...
  18. Initial monitors might have suffered early QA problems, this is not more the exception to the norm... Again... misinformation based on out-dated references... and Acer RMA experiences don't seem to be as bad as you claim... not mentioning Asus as they are them. There are newer models announced at Computex that will be coming out with 100Hz set from the factory, even able to OC to 120Hz.
  19. No, they should actually compete at a level footing rather than just pander to the general masses like the console clans... Fury and Fury X were real competitors for the 980/980Ti/TitanX... (although the 4GB memory put my off) We need 1070/1080 competition sooner than later... I've grown sick and tired of AMD just making do... until they actually compete again... I will never support their products.
×