JH275
-
Posts
121 -
Joined
-
Last visited
1 Follower
JH275's Achievements
-
Well in that case definitely the Ryzen. 4 cores vs 2 cores. 8 threads vs 4 threads. I wouldn't even consider the i3 for a server. No matter the budget.
-
I don't know about the prices but have you thought about Xeon?. The platform in more expensive but it is meant for servers.
-
4790k to a amd 1600 gaming performance
JH275 replied to jjohnthedon1's topic in CPUs, Motherboards, and Memory
The link doesn't work. Baskets are only bound to a certain PC. Or they are account specific. but We can't see the product. -
Definitely the PLUS if you are building in ATX form factor. The B50M-A is a mATX board so it lacks possibly a lot of features and looks funny in your case. If it's a ATX case.
-
4790k to a amd 1600 gaming performance
JH275 replied to jjohnthedon1's topic in CPUs, Motherboards, and Memory
I would get the 1600 since it's a new platform and AMD has claimed that the platform is future proof. Meaning that you would have to swap motherboards less often. Also the 4790K uses a really old platform so I wouldn't jump on that train. It might give better fps in gaming, but I'm not sure. Not many people are comparing Ryzen against older platforms. -
They aren't switching away from CryEngine. They're just swapping to amazons version of it. An engine change wwould not be practical at any point in game development.
-
I would get a new CPU. Bulldozer is kinda crap. If you get a 10 series or Vega you will get CPU bottlenecking. IPC is just so bad. I would go for Ryzen 7 or 5 if you need to do other stuff than gaming such as content creation modding and stuff like that. If you are only going to play games i5 or i7. i5 is kinda risky since games are starting to utilse more and more cores so a i7 7700k would be good. I'm pretty sure you can overclock it to 5 GHz since my 6700k is stable at 4.8 GHz but not sure. If you are 100% sure you will stick with an AMD GPU you might as well get a Ryzen chip. Ryzen works great with AMD graphics cards. EDIT: As others are saying the R9 390 is a good GPU. It will last at least an other year. And like I said a GPU won't do much because the FX 8350 will bottleneck
-
Also IP68 on the S8 can resist being submersed in water. I don't know the iPhones rating
-
I said water resistant. And when I said it's not it's because it died even though it was only slightly below it's maximun depth
-
Yes but the iphone gets water damage at 5 feet. So 2 feet below it's rated water resistance. That is quite weak
-
So if you watched the video you will see that the Galaxy S8 is way better at water resistant than the iPhone 7 and I was wondering if Linus could do a water damage rescue on the iPhone. Would be fun to watch.
-
Heavy CPU bottleneck in Star Citizen
JH275 replied to JH275's topic in CPUs, Motherboards, and Memory
If it is server bound that would explain it. Thx man. See you in discord some time -
Heavy CPU bottleneck in Star Citizen
JH275 replied to JH275's topic in CPUs, Motherboards, and Memory
Ok so I did a little bit of research and it appears that the game is not optimized well for multiple cores. I just thought this was a issue since No one seems to have similar problems in videos or in the discord server -
So title says most of it. The bottleneck only shows up when inside. Also my i7 6700K is overclocked to 4.8Ghz. my GPU is a EVGA GTX 1080 FTW ACX and it's got +120Mhz to the clock and +350Mhz on the memory. I know it's a CPU bottleneck since GPU utilisation is only 30% and I'm getting 20-30 fps. Also CPU usage is rather high. in the mid seventies to eighties. TLDR: heavy CPU bottleneck in Star Citizen i7 6700K@4.8Ghz GTX 1080 FTW +120/+350
-
I can't find them from the software center. also I don't think that there are any drivers for 16.10
.png)