Naijin

So far it does. I've tuned the fans with G-helper to about 50% max, it's fairly quiet and runs the GPU easily at 90W steady and 50W on the CPU, the 7845HX stays around 4.0 to 4.4 GHz while gaming as well. To be honest, it's quite close in performance to the 7800 XT it's replacing.

So I just got a laptop on sale, TUF A16 with Ryzen 9 7845HX and RTX 4070 for 1399 EUR, don't think anything can beat that price. It should be 50% faster than a 7600M XT that sells for more. Alienware with 7600M XT is 2000 EUR and the Tuf A16 with 7600S is 1000 EUR right now. An RTX 4080 laptop in QWERTY starts at 2599 with a Ryzen CPU. 1849 EUR for a Core i7 13650HX, but preferred the 12 core Ryzen. 7845HX should be 50% faster in multithreaded applications compared to the 13650HX.

Application/domain/destination IP blocked by a firewall?

Yea the US store is so far the only one I can find, but ordering it and shipping, including import fees and tax would be well over 3000 EUR unfortunately, also not sure about warranty when bought outside of the US and I'd need a new power adapter as well, since it won't work in the EU... That's why I'm trying to find one in the EU.

I quite like the AMD GPU offerings, and AFMF (frame generation) working outside of the game engine has worked quite well for me with my 7800 XT. I don't really need DLSS or raytracing.

Hey everyone, I'm trying to find a laptop with the Radeon RX 7900M in Europe to replace my current laptop and desktop, so I only have 1 system. However I can only find the Radeon 7600S with the Asus Tuf A16, for about 1050 EUR. Anything above that is impossible to find. Only the Alienware m16 can be bought with the 12 core Ryzen 9 7845HX, which is a beast, but only an RX 7600M XT, comparable to an RTX 4060, for over 2000 EUR. Are there any other Radeon options for sale in the EU? Preferably a Radeon RX 7900M? Import from the US is not an option, as it would be well over 3000 EUR for an Alienware with that GPU.

The Intel N100 minis are usually fine, I wouldn't go with anything lower. You can find them for 150 USD/EUR sometimes.

If you know you have MX style switches and keycaps, look for a set of those. The layout is ISO. If I'm not mistaken, these do use low profile keycaps. Plenty of sets to find but these stock ones appear to shine through and have north facing RGB? Most custom sets do not have shine through (milky could work). Look for "low profile ISO mx keycaps" and you should find what you need. Someone on Reddit was in exactly the same boat, more info about the keycaps and keyboard in the comments:

Both will be just fine. If you go larger, usually it means more quiet operation at the same temperatures or lower temperature at the same noise level. Do note that a good dual tower heatsink can work just as well these days. The Thermalright Phantom Spirit 120 is the successor to the Peerless Assassin 120 and can perform like the Noctua NH-D15 or better.

It depends on what you want/like. For multitasking, the i7/i9 will be better. For gaming, they're more equal and trading blows. Sometimes the 7800X3D comes first, in another game the Intel chips. If you're not really bothered by high temperatures and power draw, the Intel will be the better choice. Though in every single game you run, the Intel will consome about 2x up to 3x the amount of power that the 7800X3D needs for the same fps. For example, in a game where the 7800X3D consumes 50W, the Intels could draw 100-150W for the same amount of fps. The 7900X3D has 2 groups of cores, 6 cores have access to the X3D while the others don't. For gaming only, just stick to the 7800X3D or 7950X3D if you need the threads.

An external DVD drive can be plugged in with USB, it's not expensive either so should always be an option. We can't recommend or help with piracy here so if you want to play a game that requires a disc to be present, getting a DVD drive, be it built in or external (USB etc) is the only way.

Get an external DVD drive. You need to have the physical disk readable by the software in order to run it. It's anti-piracy.

At what resolution will you play and what is your target framerate? According to the relative performance of TechPowerUp, the 7700 XT is roughly 40-46% faster on all resolutions. Price to performance wise, the 7700 XT is the better choice. https://www.techpowerup.com/review/sapphire-radeon-rx-7600-xt-pulse/32.html

As said by @GuiltySpark_ the P12 is generally considered better. They're also one of, if not the best fan considering price/performance/noise.

If it's not in the support list of the motherboard, it probably won't work.

I had an Alienware 13 r3 with 7700HQ. When I bought it second hand, temps would shoot to the 100's as well. I repasted the CPU and GPU and temps were then fine at 70-80 with 100% load with idles around 30-40. Check your thermal paste. Remove the heatsink and repaste those 2 chips with a good thermal paste. Don't forget to remove the old paste from both heatsink and CPU though.

Yes, the 5800x3D is much more capable of handling a 4080S, however, it may still end up insufficient in the future (7800x3D should get even higher fps out of the same GPU).

You overclock it and run Prime95, it's kind of what you can expect. Reset to stock and see what your temps are.

Are you talking about core temp or hotspot temp?

Your mount could've been a bit off, thermal paste, ... The Thermalright is just a good cooler but the Freezer II 360 should perform slightly better. Is the cooler mounted as exhaust? If yes, that could explain higher temperatures. If you would mount the AIO up front you draw in cold air instead of hot air from the GPU. An air cooler will more or less channel the air and exhaust it to the back, generally using less hot air from the GPU. Bitwit tested this, while the GPU temp would stay roughly the same, CPU temperatures change a lot.

Correct on all those points, so I hope to see some good results soon. Right now there's no CPU that does every single task best, it's either THIS or THAT. It will be an interesting few years to come

I just read the TPU article, this is hilarious. This CPU just doesn't make sense, a huge power draw and on top of that, to get that performance, you need a big and powerful cooler. Intel probably knows it made some wrong decisions in R&D and hope they will be back in the game soon. The 7800X3D is still gaming king, which is the case for a lot of buyers. It's much more efficient as well. They need to cut power by 1/2 or even to 1/3 of the 14900KS while keeping the same performance. That's going to require some redesigns for sure. Remember the Ryzen 1000 release? The 1800x was crushing Intel and they got scared, rapidly increasing core counts in the i7/i9 8000 and 9000 series. It's like AMD is leading and Intel is kind of clueless trying to keep up. Not going to deny, the 14900KS, even others as well, are impressive, but for some buyers the power draw and/or temperatures matter. Not every user wants to spend extra on beefy cooling, but if you don't with this chip, you'll leave a lot of performance on the table.

How long did you wait? AM5 needs memory training on first post so that can take some time. In some cases even 10 or more minutes.

No, you can download the ISO directly from the MS website, but you still need to flash it to a USB drive. This is usually done with Rufus or any other tool that can create a bootable USB. Just copy-pasting the files directly onto the USB will not work. I'd suggest choosing the "create Windows 11 installation media" option for ease of use, or the third option and install it via Rufus etc. https://www.microsoft.com/software-download/windows11

Disconnect all drives except the boot drive If that doesn't work, create a bootable USB with Windows and try instaling from USB instead of the "reset my pc" option, that's usually kind of janky anyway