Papplebeast

You are so certain of yourself and you couldn't be more wrong.  You have been providing a great demonstration of the Dunning-Kruger effect.
 
Anyway, for 1080p, there are 1920x1080 = 2,073,600 pixels (multiply 1920 by 1080)
For 2160p (4K) there are 3840x2160 = 8,294,400 pixels (multiply 3840 by 2160)
 
8,294,400 / 2,073,600 = 4
 
2160p (4K) has 4 times as many pixels as 1080p.
 
This is a common mistake people make when dealing with multiple dimensions.  If you double the lengths of each side of a rectangle, you quadruple (2^2) the area.  If you double the lengths of each side of a cube, you octuple (8 or 2^3) the volume.  If you're dealing with 4 dimensional space, it's 16 (2^4), and so on for each dimension you add.

You are so certain of yourself and you couldn't be more wrong.  You have been providing a great demonstration of the Dunning-Kruger effect.
 
Anyway, for 1080p, there are 1920x1080 = 2,073,600 pixels (multiply 1920 by 1080)
For 2160p (4K) there are 3840x2160 = 8,294,400 pixels (multiply 3840 by 2160)
 
8,294,400 / 2,073,600 = 4
 
2160p (4K) has 4 times as many pixels as 1080p.
 
This is a common mistake people make when dealing with multiple dimensions.  If you double the lengths of each side of a rectangle, you quadruple (2^2) the area.  If you double the lengths of each side of a cube, you octuple (8 or 2^3) the volume.  If you're dealing with 4 dimensional space, it's 16 (2^4), and so on for each dimension you add.

You are so certain of yourself and you couldn't be more wrong.  You have been providing a great demonstration of the Dunning-Kruger effect.
 
Anyway, for 1080p, there are 1920x1080 = 2,073,600 pixels (multiply 1920 by 1080)
For 2160p (4K) there are 3840x2160 = 8,294,400 pixels (multiply 3840 by 2160)
 
8,294,400 / 2,073,600 = 4
 
2160p (4K) has 4 times as many pixels as 1080p.
 
This is a common mistake people make when dealing with multiple dimensions.  If you double the lengths of each side of a rectangle, you quadruple (2^2) the area.  If you double the lengths of each side of a cube, you octuple (8 or 2^3) the volume.  If you're dealing with 4 dimensional space, it's 16 (2^4), and so on for each dimension you add.

You are so certain of yourself and you couldn't be more wrong.  You have been providing a great demonstration of the Dunning-Kruger effect.
 
Anyway, for 1080p, there are 1920x1080 = 2,073,600 pixels (multiply 1920 by 1080)
For 2160p (4K) there are 3840x2160 = 8,294,400 pixels (multiply 3840 by 2160)
 
8,294,400 / 2,073,600 = 4
 
2160p (4K) has 4 times as many pixels as 1080p.
 
This is a common mistake people make when dealing with multiple dimensions.  If you double the lengths of each side of a rectangle, you quadruple (2^2) the area.  If you double the lengths of each side of a cube, you octuple (8 or 2^3) the volume.  If you're dealing with 4 dimensional space, it's 16 (2^4), and so on for each dimension you add.

You are so certain of yourself and you couldn't be more wrong.  You have been providing a great demonstration of the Dunning-Kruger effect.
 
Anyway, for 1080p, there are 1920x1080 = 2,073,600 pixels (multiply 1920 by 1080)
For 2160p (4K) there are 3840x2160 = 8,294,400 pixels (multiply 3840 by 2160)
 
8,294,400 / 2,073,600 = 4
 
2160p (4K) has 4 times as many pixels as 1080p.
 
This is a common mistake people make when dealing with multiple dimensions.  If you double the lengths of each side of a rectangle, you quadruple (2^2) the area.  If you double the lengths of each side of a cube, you octuple (8 or 2^3) the volume.  If you're dealing with 4 dimensional space, it's 16 (2^4), and so on for each dimension you add.

You are so certain of yourself and you couldn't be more wrong.  You have been providing a great demonstration of the Dunning-Kruger effect.
 
Anyway, for 1080p, there are 1920x1080 = 2,073,600 pixels (multiply 1920 by 1080)
For 2160p (4K) there are 3840x2160 = 8,294,400 pixels (multiply 3840 by 2160)
 
8,294,400 / 2,073,600 = 4
 
2160p (4K) has 4 times as many pixels as 1080p.
 
This is a common mistake people make when dealing with multiple dimensions.  If you double the lengths of each side of a rectangle, you quadruple (2^2) the area.  If you double the lengths of each side of a cube, you octuple (8 or 2^3) the volume.  If you're dealing with 4 dimensional space, it's 16 (2^4), and so on for each dimension you add.

You are so certain of yourself and you couldn't be more wrong.  You have been providing a great demonstration of the Dunning-Kruger effect.
 
Anyway, for 1080p, there are 1920x1080 = 2,073,600 pixels (multiply 1920 by 1080)
For 2160p (4K) there are 3840x2160 = 8,294,400 pixels (multiply 3840 by 2160)
 
8,294,400 / 2,073,600 = 4
 
2160p (4K) has 4 times as many pixels as 1080p.
 
This is a common mistake people make when dealing with multiple dimensions.  If you double the lengths of each side of a rectangle, you quadruple (2^2) the area.  If you double the lengths of each side of a cube, you octuple (8 or 2^3) the volume.  If you're dealing with 4 dimensional space, it's 16 (2^4), and so on for each dimension you add.