-
Posts
173 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Awards
This user doesn't have any awards
About jiyang1018
- Birthday Oct 18, 1981
Contact Methods
-
Twitter
design4paragon
- Website URL
Profile Information
-
Gender
Male
-
Location
Philadelphia, PA USA
-
Occupation
Industrial Designer, Computer Enthusiast
-
Member title
Junior Member
System
-
CPU
i7 3930K
-
Motherboard
Asus Rampage IV Extreme
-
RAM
Corsair Dominator Platinum 4x8GB DDR3 1600
-
GPU
EVGA SC+ Signature w/ Backplate GTX 680
-
Case
Cooler Master Cosmos II
-
Storage
OCZ Vector 256GB SSD
-
PSU
XFX ProSeries 1250W
-
Display(s)
DELL 2408 wfp
-
Cooling
Corsair H100
-
Keyboard
Levetron Mech5
-
Mouse
Steelseries WOW
-
Sound
Creative Lab Recon 3D
- PCPartPicker URL
Recent Profile Visitors
The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.
jiyang1018's Achievements
-
great little box for plex
-
I guess PNY hates someone or the other way around :P :P :P
jiyang1018 replied to jiyang1018's topic in Storage Devices
2 tools show no difference, 2 show significant difference with or without driver. Funny part is ATTO showed slow write speed once, but never happened again in the retest. My guess is they use different writing procedures, and you are probably right on the money about compression side of things. -
I guess PNY hates someone or the other way around :P :P :P
jiyang1018 replied to jiyang1018's topic in Storage Devices
The problem is Asmedia controller has benchmark software performance issue with PNY Optima 480GB when driver installed. Without driver, PNY and OCZ perform closely on asmedia controller. I copied an 8GB file from another SSD to PNY on Asmedia port, and it was well over 300MB/s. -
I guess PNY hates someone or the other way around :P :P :P
jiyang1018 replied to jiyang1018's topic in Storage Devices
Using "hate" is a joke. I agree with you. That must be a bug. I tried 8GB single file transfer, and it was always above 300MB/s from another SSD on X79 SATA3 port. -
Don't take the word "hate" seriously. I am joking. I did some SSD benchmark on my Rampage IV Extreme. 2 SSDs tested, OCZ Vector 256GB and PNY Optima 480GB (SMI). I noticed something very strange. Asmedia SATA 3 6gbps ports are slower than the ones from X79 chipset, which is understandable. PNY Optima 480GB suffers if Asmedia driver is installed, v2.0.8.0, v2.0.8.1, or v2.0.9.1. Take OCZ Vector 256GB results as a reference Note that "AS SSD Seq Write" speed here, with any driver tested, is much slower than no driver, X79 SATA3 port, or even X79 SATA2 port. I am not sure it is an AS SSD issue because one other tool I used has the same result as posted below. The strange thing is other 2 tools show no difference (very minor difference) with different drivers or without driver. Large amount of data screenshots below:
-
I am hoping to see a cylinder one.
- 1,001 replies
-
- mineral oil
- pc
- (and 8 more)
-
I am really working on a mATX version in fact. But it is going very slowly.
- 22 replies
-
- design
- computer case design
- (and 3 more)
-
I see. It is just I sit for very long everyday and now I really feel the need to use my computer while standing once every hour or two. I wished I would have seen this when I made my giant table.
-
- 22 replies
-
- design
- computer case design
- (and 3 more)
-
First of all thank you all for your interest. I hope my thread won't be deleted again. I am glad you asked since I did not present that clearly. There is 55mm from graphic card to side window, 10mm from top of CPU fan to side window. That means, even a Titan Z will get plenty of airflow. Plus there can be 4 fans blowing air towards these 2 components. I have my personal website hosting more detailed picture, VR, video and other things I design, and I first posted a link to my website. Guess what, my thread was deleted. I do not want to take the risk again. I personally do not like ITX, that is why I am working on a MATX version. Right now it is just a concept. I am glad you like it. I put 900D to the far side so it won't take half of the picture frame. Core of my design measures 385 x 385 x 170mm, 25.2L. With all plastic shells, it is rougly 435x435x170mm, 32.2L. Keep that in context, Corsair 380T is 393x292x356mm, 40.8L (should be smaller than that because it is not a box shape), Corsair 250D is 351x277x290mm, 28.2L, Corsair 900D is 692x252x650mm, 113.3L. I would say it is quite small comparing to all these Corsair cases. Befenix Prodigy is 250x310x340mm, 26.35L internally, according to http://www.bitfenix.com/global/en/products/chassis/prodigy#specs. So internally, my design is still smaller. My design criteria were: better cooling performance than Silverstone RVZ 01, Bitfenix Prodigy and Corsair 250D; Smaller than Corsair 250D and Bitfenix Prodigy; Support R9 295x2 power requirement(that is why I have 2 SFX PSU mounts); 380T came out after I started the design process so I did not consider that as a competition. Maybe it's not bull's eye hit on the size part, but pretty much.
- 22 replies
-
- design
- computer case design
- (and 3 more)
-
A computer case design Let me know what you think Again. It is a design. Size comparison to one of the biggest cases, one of the smallest ones and one of the popular ones. Left to right, Silverstone RVZ 01, Bitfenix Prodigy, my design, Corsair 900D Keyshot VR is also available: I do not want to show the link to my personal website and get my thread deleted again for advertising, but I have to provide a way for you to see this VR I spent days to render on my computer. A short demo of different layouts, still rendered for days so you can see my design better: http://youtu.be/IRw7jOIApSI
- 22 replies
-
- design
- computer case design
- (and 3 more)
-
have you considered height adjustable table frame/base?
-
Now I feel more and more that way. I wish I had. But I never thought these two could go so well together.
- 41 replies
-
- silverstone
- cosmos ii
- (and 7 more)