Jump to content

jiyang1018

Member
  • Posts

    173
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Awards

This user doesn't have any awards

1 Follower

About jiyang1018

  • Birthday Oct 18, 1981

Contact Methods

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Philadelphia, PA USA
  • Occupation
    Industrial Designer, Computer Enthusiast
  • Member title
    Junior Member

System

  • CPU
    i7 3930K
  • Motherboard
    Asus Rampage IV Extreme
  • RAM
    Corsair Dominator Platinum 4x8GB DDR3 1600
  • GPU
    EVGA SC+ Signature w/ Backplate GTX 680
  • Case
    Cooler Master Cosmos II
  • Storage
    OCZ Vector 256GB SSD
  • PSU
    XFX ProSeries 1250W
  • Display(s)
    DELL 2408 wfp
  • Cooling
    Corsair H100
  • Keyboard
    Levetron Mech5
  • Mouse
    Steelseries WOW
  • Sound
    Creative Lab Recon 3D
  • PCPartPicker URL

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. 2 tools show no difference, 2 show significant difference with or without driver. Funny part is ATTO showed slow write speed once, but never happened again in the retest. My guess is they use different writing procedures, and you are probably right on the money about compression side of things.
  2. The problem is Asmedia controller has benchmark software performance issue with PNY Optima 480GB when driver installed. Without driver, PNY and OCZ perform closely on asmedia controller. I copied an 8GB file from another SSD to PNY on Asmedia port, and it was well over 300MB/s.
  3. Using "hate" is a joke. I agree with you. That must be a bug. I tried 8GB single file transfer, and it was always above 300MB/s from another SSD on X79 SATA3 port.
  4. Don't take the word "hate" seriously. I am joking. I did some SSD benchmark on my Rampage IV Extreme. 2 SSDs tested, OCZ Vector 256GB and PNY Optima 480GB (SMI). I noticed something very strange. Asmedia SATA 3 6gbps ports are slower than the ones from X79 chipset, which is understandable. PNY Optima 480GB suffers if Asmedia driver is installed, v2.0.8.0, v2.0.8.1, or v2.0.9.1. Take OCZ Vector 256GB results as a reference Note that "AS SSD Seq Write" speed here, with any driver tested, is much slower than no driver, X79 SATA3 port, or even X79 SATA2 port. I am not sure it is an AS SSD issue because one other tool I used has the same result as posted below. The strange thing is other 2 tools show no difference (very minor difference) with different drivers or without driver. Large amount of data screenshots below:
  5. I see. It is just I sit for very long everyday and now I really feel the need to use my computer while standing once every hour or two. I wished I would have seen this when I made my giant table.
  6. First of all thank you all for your interest. I hope my thread won't be deleted again. I am glad you asked since I did not present that clearly. There is 55mm from graphic card to side window, 10mm from top of CPU fan to side window. That means, even a Titan Z will get plenty of airflow. Plus there can be 4 fans blowing air towards these 2 components. I have my personal website hosting more detailed picture, VR, video and other things I design, and I first posted a link to my website. Guess what, my thread was deleted. I do not want to take the risk again. I personally do not like ITX, that is why I am working on a MATX version. Right now it is just a concept. I am glad you like it. I put 900D to the far side so it won't take half of the picture frame. Core of my design measures 385 x 385 x 170mm, 25.2L. With all plastic shells, it is rougly 435x435x170mm, 32.2L. Keep that in context, Corsair 380T is 393x292x356mm, 40.8L (should be smaller than that because it is not a box shape), Corsair 250D is 351x277x290mm, 28.2L, Corsair 900D is 692x252x650mm, 113.3L. I would say it is quite small comparing to all these Corsair cases. Befenix Prodigy is 250x310x340mm, 26.35L internally, according to http://www.bitfenix.com/global/en/products/chassis/prodigy#specs. So internally, my design is still smaller. My design criteria were: better cooling performance than Silverstone RVZ 01, Bitfenix Prodigy and Corsair 250D; Smaller than Corsair 250D and Bitfenix Prodigy; Support R9 295x2 power requirement(that is why I have 2 SFX PSU mounts); 380T came out after I started the design process so I did not consider that as a competition. Maybe it's not bull's eye hit on the size part, but pretty much.
  7. A computer case design Let me know what you think Again. It is a design. Size comparison to one of the biggest cases, one of the smallest ones and one of the popular ones. Left to right, Silverstone RVZ 01, Bitfenix Prodigy, my design, Corsair 900D Keyshot VR is also available: I do not want to show the link to my personal website and get my thread deleted again for advertising, but I have to provide a way for you to see this VR I spent days to render on my computer. A short demo of different layouts, still rendered for days so you can see my design better: http://youtu.be/IRw7jOIApSI
  8. have you considered height adjustable table frame/base?
×