Hey Linus Tech community,
I have done some research into the pros and cons of SSD's in RAID 0 versus a single SSD.
most of what I found were from older forums back when SSD's probably weren't quite as reliable as they are today and most of the time people would say 1 SSD is best, but on the newer forums the answers were more 50/50. I'm wondering what the best solution is for a rig where only programs which can be easily recovered are installed on the main drive (Windows & Games mostly) is.
The drives I have in mind are the Intel 730 SSD's where there is a lot of talk about them being excellent drives for RAID 0. For example Linus using them in the Ultimate 4k Gaming Build Guide back in June. Would 2x 240GB drives or 1x 480GB drive be a better solution for a rig where no important or unrecoverable files are stored. Also, will this affect game load times or is there a certain stage where other hardware or the game itself will prevent it from loading any faster.
Can someone please answer this from personal experience with both RAID 0 SSD's Vs 1 single SSD and give justification as to why Linus used them in his build guide as it wasn't very clear to me why he decided to go with the RAID 0 solution (his justification seemed to be that people wanted to know how to set up SSD's in RAID 0 - not because it is a better storage solution).
I am mostly asking out of curiosity as I am quite happy with my own storage solution. As mentioned earlier if someone who knows what they are talking about and/or has experience with this topic could answer rather than just giving the theoretical one sided answer it would be much appreciated. On a lot of forums people will mostly say yes or no and wont give good reasoning/ the pros and cons of each.
Thanks, and I apologise for how long this post is!