At the moment I have a 15'' 2019 six core MacBook Pro at work. My machine had some issues and I had to work on a spare one that is a 15'' 2017 MacBook Pro - quad core. The only difference between them performance wise are the 2 missing cores and DDR3 vs DDR4. For me the difference was huge. I hated the 2017 the whole time and for most part I think that RAM speed made the difference, that's why I'm hesitant to go with the two thunderbolt 13'' MacBook Pro and that's why I'm comparing it with the four thunderbolt 13'' Pro since it has the same fast RAM.
I'm aware that the statement that I made above sounds stupid - at least to me it surely does - but for some reason that's the feel I get from this recent comparison that I had. One of the reasons this could be the issue is that I usually have around 10 tabs opened in chrome besides fleep, slack, skype and Android Studio and all those apps really consume RAM.
In Romania we usually get the option to choose between ISO and ROU keyboards, so I'm not concerned about this.
This seems less than ideal to me too, that's why I was asking if anyone tried it. This also sounds a bit stupid to me since I'm asking if Apple's least expensive laptop can drive 2 4k displays and what's even crazier for me is that I would spend less than half of the price for the Air for those 2 4k monitors.
Again, thank you for your input @Darkseth @Kilrah @Commodus