EPSFBPMOSF

EnSha' Allah, I guess I'm going with 4670k with 770 B)

this video is really nice .. I don't have to worry about BF3, my big concern is BF4 B)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=57HgWGqP6cQ Here's i5 with a lot of CPU usage and that could cause CPU bottleneck and overloading, I guess. 6300 I don't think it's suitable for BF4 ..

Yeah .. I heard it in linustechtips video about this specific topic "future proofing" the technology goes on .. I want a CPU which really plays BF4 really good. >>>>>>>> I'm going to search for my final decision, it's either 4670k or 8350. If I want more threads, then 8350 cheaper than 4770k, otherwise 4670k .. got it !!

That's depends on which CPU I would get, right? or others said it doesn't perform any difference !! Mostly, I would 280x, 770 or if I lost my mind I would buy the 780 which I wouldn't go that far so either 770 or 280x OK .. this is my final decision .. I read a lot and even don't want to see more videos and benchmarks, because I don't have the full gaming set for every video. I've read this " U must be reading that people say that "theres no need for eight core there is no game foreseable future that could even utilize 4 cores at their full potential" This statement is UNTRUE Even present games like crysis 3 utilizes full 6 cores of phenom ll 1090t so u ll need a eight core for future proofing This is the reason that future consoles like xbox1 and ps4 wuold be having 8 cores" on this page: http://www.tomshardware.com/answers/id-1760833/cpu-bf4.html there's more interesting discussion on the same page .. Here's also an interesting discussion: http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf4/forum/threadview/2955065221186361914/3/ They say 8350 is very good and similar to 4670k, even they recommend its 8 cores feature for future games. The issue I learned about 8350 is the temperature GOES very hot!! because it consumes more power than intel. I like the 8 cores, though intel as what i learned is enough for gaming. And also, I want to know is HT of 4770k is like actual extra cores, or it just helps in rendering and other intensive applications?

one wrote to me " While I like AMD CPUs a lot, the 4670k blows the 6300 out of the water. It's a hexa core, but it's 6 weaker cores so to say and 99% of the games are single core anyways so you'll be better off with the 4670k. The 280x is somewhat better than the 770 [the 770 is a rebranded 680 the 280x is a rebranded 7970. And I had a lot of trouble with the 680 so personally I'd go with the 280x over the 770 and go with the i5 over the 6300. Yes, Intel CPUs and AMD GPUs work flawlessly (using a i5 2500k and a 290x myself ]" what's your opinion?

so intel would go in a diff path or follow more cores architecture? this is a personal conflict to me rather than on the internet !! because I want to buy gaming parts and I have to decide which CPU. Because it's the base for the motherboard. So, one said that AMD cores; like 6300 are weaker cores compared to 4670k, is this info correct? Also, you said that games support 6 or 8 cores not very well, what does it mean. Do you mean weaker cores like the info I got?

So .. in the current time .. what should I buy .. 4670k, FX-6300, 8320 or 8350?

WOW .. I really like your tech experiences OK .. one last inquiry, because I want to order the parts :wub: so i have to be precise and careful. 4670k would be the CPU >> which is better of these GPUs, 7970, 780 or 280x? thank you very much well i searched now in Amazon, 280x is relatively cheaper than 7970 ??!

how about this one .. PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant / Benchmarks CPU: AMD FX-6300 3.5GHz 6-Core Processor ($107.99 @ NCIX US) CPU Cooler: Corsair H100i 77.0 CFM Liquid CPU Cooler ($69.99 @ NCIX US) Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3 ATX AM3+ Motherboard ($114.00 @ Newegg) Memory: G.Skill Ripjaws X Series 8GB (2 x 4GB) DDR3-1866 Memory ($84.99 @ Newegg) Storage: Western Digital Caviar Blue 1TB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive ($59.55 @ Amazon) Video Card: Asus Radeon R9 280X 3GB Video Card ($379.99 @ Amazon) Case: Corsair Air 540 ATX Mid Tower Case ($109.99 @ NCIX US) Power Supply: SeaSonic 750W 80+ Gold Certified Fully-Modular ATX Power Supply ($138.97 @ Mwave) Total: $1045.47 (Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available.) (Generated by PCPartPicker 2014-03-28 13:35 EDT-0400)

OK .. 780 is quite expensive .. so i have to think more before buying it. I'm comfortable with the idea of 770 >>> 780 need more search to find if it's worth the extra money! 4670k with 770 .. so far my choices. I have last wondering before ordering the parts, that the fx-6300 with r9 270x or r9 280x .. would do like or better than intel cpu with nvidia gpu. Now i'm going to produce purchase list in pcpartpicker to see this idea B)

FX-6300 or 4670k? Which is best base for the rig? :wub:

I liked your recommendation. It's much similar to what I chose. >>> why you chose AsRock, I heard it has problems .. it looks nice though. Also, why you chose this CPU cooler, I saw most the ratings about the cooler master. And, this one has two fans. I guess it would be more powerful, so thanks. Many people like the bronze certified PSU, why you chose Gold? The monitor is good, I would rather buy it from eBay or Amazon, if I decided to buy 1440p monitor. Thanks, the total is reasonable with the monitor

Yes and it's overclockable !! I want to buy it, except i'm afraid that a GPU like 770 won't run it at high resolution and fast screen frequency

WOW .. I saw couple of BF4 videos on YouTube B) what an amazing game .. how much of imagination did the developers accomplish in this game !! it's very funny game I'm really want to play this game without cutting or overloading the CPU >> so tell me if 4670k is more than enough to play it ? Wouldn't you think 780 or 780 ti more powerful than 4670k, or it drives them very well? I guess 770 is perfect for 4670k. Yeah, you're right it depends on my budget, are 780 or 780 ti more and far powerful than 770? 3GB for 780 is very good memory size for a game like BF4. Or may 2GB is just more than enough. The 770 would be very nice for 1080p, so what you think of BenQ XL27 or ASUS VG27 because I like bigger screen. I read that many gamers don't like TN panels because they loose image quality with high speed of FPS!! I want to check this out before buying one of them. I saw a video about diff between HDD and SSD in booting, not to much difference. Are there other reasons and advantages you like to tell me about? thank you .. if I set BF4 on the new gaming rig, then I want to play with you as a thank from me <<< you better won't, I'm very noobi in FPS games though I like intensive games and I'm proud to be, the most important goal to me is having an amazing time ..