Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...

Gymnastboatman

Member
  • Content Count

    5
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Awards


This user doesn't have any awards

About Gymnastboatman

  • Title
    Newbie

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Source While the features could make it useful for gaming, just....why. Be sure to read the title like this.
  2. It sounds like it’s essentially internally bonded inside the wire? It’s basically just a technicality, saying “Well, it’s not really a new standard, so we can’t call it 3.2 without qualifications.” Except they could. No one would be upset.
  3. I slightly understand the 2x2 stuff, as is is just technically 2 10Gbps connections slapped together, instead of an evolution. But who cares? 3, 3.1, and 3.2 would’ve sufficed. Agreed.
  4. Macrumors article USB 3.2 (20Gbps) has been rebranded to USB 3.2 Gen 2x2, while also rebranding USB 3.1 Gen 2 (10Gbps) to USB 3.2 Gen 2, and rebranding USB 3.1 Gen 1 (Which was USB 3 prior to the EARLIER rebrand) into USB 3.2 Gen 1. (Table in description might make that make more sense. Originally from Tom’s Hardware, shown in MacRumors article.) Who put George Lucas in charge of the naming department? Boy, I can’t wait to see this explanation on the WAN show.
×