Kuisco

I don't plan on overclocking, so the only issue I see with the motherboard from the amd build is the build quality compared to the Intel ones(Intel one seems better) and ram slots 2vs4 which is not a big problem, I guess it all boils down to the price now.

the systems are prebuilds since it's cheaper to buy so than individual parts in eastern europe, is 2400mhz ram going to be a bottleneck in the ryzen build or it won't make much difference?

Thanks for the help, the systems are prebuilds since it's cheaper to buy so than individual parts in eastern europe, will the ram be a bottleneck, I am assuming it is mostly noticed in games which I don't mind much.

So the price difference between the two prebuilds is 123 euros more for the AMD build, is it worth it? The main purpose of the pc is for virtualization (gns3, linux vms) & coding. other activities: light gaming(cs:go) and editing Intel build: MSI GeForce GTX 1060 3GT OC, 3GB GDDR5 Biostar B250GT3 - Intel B250 Crucial Ballistix Sport LT, 8 GB RAM DDR4, 2400 MHz Intel Core i5-8400 SSD Patriot Burst - 240GB Evolveo - 550W price: 604 euros AMD build: ASRock Radeon Phantom Gaming D RX580 8G OC, 8GB GDDR5 ASUS PRIME A320M-R - AMD A320 Crucial Ballistix Sport LT, 8 GB RAM DDR4, 2400 MHz SSD Patriot Burst - 240GB Evolveo - 550W Ryzen 7 2700 price: 727 euros. My concerns are if 6 cores in the Intel is good enough for future proof? Is the price difference worth it considering 2 more cores, a better stock cooler, higher clock rate? Are the GPUs equivalent considering the memory (3gb vs 8gb) and how much difference is it to justify the price? The Intel build does come up with a better Motherboard and case but I don't plan to overclock. Your help is much appreciated thanks :)