-
Posts
41 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Awards
This user doesn't have any awards
Profile Information
-
Gender
Male
System
-
CPU
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
-
Motherboard
Gigabyte X470 Aorus Ultra Gaming
-
RAM
Triden Z RGB 16GB
-
GPU
RTX 2070
-
Case
Thermaltake N24
-
Storage
2TB 7200RPM HDD, 256GB Samsung Evo, 4x 250GB SSD
-
PSU
850watt PSU
-
Cooling
Corsair H100i
-
Keyboard
Corsair Strafe
-
Mouse
DI Specter 1
-
Operating System
Windows 10 Pro
Recent Profile Visitors
The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.
MrFisc's Achievements
-
Again, I'm not trying to start an argument over the content of the platform, the quality of the platform, the stance of the platform, or anything in between. But if LTT is linking to a platform, it seems strange not to use the official name of that platform.
-
I don't have an answer, I have an assumption. That's why I asked a question lol
-
This wasn't really intended to start an argument over whether "X" should be called by it's official name or a name that the community deems more appropriate, "Twitter". But the intention is to market social media accounts on a platform, and that platforms official name is "X", regardless of our opinions on the name. Just strange to me. I believe LTT's reasoning for not updating is it likely just "updating the name of the social platform on our banner isn't super high on our list of priorities", and not an opinion of "i'll never call it x" such as that which is being illustrated here. I personally don't care in the slightest if LTT uses "Twitter" or "X" (although it is becoming apparent that a lot of people here care very much about it.) But, for someone unfamiliar with the platform (albeit unlikely), or someone like me who isn't so strongly opinionated on the naming of a social platform, it seems confusing to use an old name that's no longer the official name of the platform.
-
Is it weird that the WAN shows banner still shows "Twitter" for socials when "Twitter" isn't a platform anymore?
-
Update: I ended up purchasing the iDock D23 and it works flawlessly! Honestly, with my past experiences with KVMs and drawbacks such as the speed at which they can switch between source systems, this KVM works really well for me. I can switch between PCs with only about a 1-3 second delay. It supports my monitors 165hz refresh rate just fine at 1440p, and all of the pass-through works as expected.
-
I'm not sure if this is the right section to be posting this in, if not let me know and I'll try to move it. I'm looking for a decent KVM that supports three monitors and two PCs. I've found stuff like the AVAccess iDock D23 that looks promising, but has me a bit concerned since it's a "frequently returned" item on Amazon. But, in the ideal world it has all of the features I'm looking for. - Support for three monitors at 144hz 1440p (minimum) - Pass-through for at least 1GB networking (I don't do any home networking, so 1GB is enough for me) (Pass-through networking isn't a requirement for me, I can always wire up a network switch) But, I'm wondering if anyone else has experience with KVMs and might have a recommendation for one that meets the specs I'm looking for and is known to be a reliable device.
-
I'm trying to find a motherboard that will better support my existing ram. I ran into issues with my existing motherboard not supporting my ram at it's advertised 3200mhz, more info in the topic below: So i'm just looking for recommendations of a motherboard that's AM4 and supports this ram at 3200mhz. I have no idea how to look into this myself besides reading through QVLs for every motherboard. So i figured i'd ask here, maybe someone here has a motherboard and is already running these modules. Specifically, the modules are PN: F4-3200C16-8GTZR The exact ram: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B01MTDEYHU/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_title_o04_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1&tag=linus21-20
-
I have a very strange issue. I recently purchased the parts for a new computer and put it all together. For the most part, it runs fine. I don't have issues with most of the games I play. However, in some cases the system will completely black screen and restart. I've tried looking around in event viewer for why, but can't figure it out. The most consistent case i can reproduce is when i run Escape from Tarkov. Basically, the only way i can get the game to work is if i set my native resolution to 1080p, launch the game, then set the in game resolution to 720p, load a level, then once i'm IN THE LEVEL set my resolution back up to 4k. If when i LAUNCH THE GAME the resolution is anything above 1080p, the computer will black screen and restart. If when i LOAD THE LEVEL the resolution is anything about 720p, the computer will black screen and restart. I've also experienced this black screen issue ONCE with Modern Warfare 2019, but other than that it seems to be running fine. When it did happen, lowering my resolution seemed to fix it. But, being that it only happened once i haven't really been able to reproduce it yet. Normally i would just blame Tarkov, but the fact that it's happened now in another game has me worried. The computer set up is as follows: CPU: Ryzen 5 1600 AF (12nm) Pinnacle Ridge RAM: G.SKILL Trident Z RGB 16GB 3200Mhz C16 Motherboard: ASRock B450m/ac GPU: RX 590 FATBOY I'm using a 500w PSU from Thermaltake, so i don't THINK it's a power issue. I've also monitored temperatures, and while the GPU does get up over 80C, it doesn't crash when i stress test it exclusively and it passes that 80C mark in other games without any issues. I'm just having difficulty pinpointing what component is causing this or what is even going on. It may also be important to note that I've been having issues with my ram speed, you can find information about that in this topic:
-
Can't get ram up to it's advertised 3200Mhz
MrFisc replied to MrFisc's topic in CPUs, Motherboards, and Memory
I've reviewed the QVL for the motherboard and i think it just doesn't support it. I'm using F4-3200C16-8GTZR, they don't specifically list this however all other G.SKILL ram that's 3200 seems to be limited in a similar way. -
Can't get ram up to it's advertised 3200Mhz
MrFisc replied to MrFisc's topic in CPUs, Motherboards, and Memory
My last computer was running a Ryzen 5 2600 with this exact ram and had no problems, but that was on a gigabyte b450 aorus as well, not this ASRock board i'm using now. -
Can't get ram up to it's advertised 3200Mhz
MrFisc replied to MrFisc's topic in CPUs, Motherboards, and Memory
I tried following this guide and entered the "Safe" timings into my bios, still stuck at 2133 -
Can't get ram up to it's advertised 3200Mhz
MrFisc replied to MrFisc's topic in CPUs, Motherboards, and Memory
I've already updated the bios to the latest version 1.70 -
Can't get ram up to it's advertised 3200Mhz
MrFisc replied to MrFisc's topic in CPUs, Motherboards, and Memory
I can't even get it to post with them in slots 2/4 (which are labeled as A2,B2) -
Can't get ram up to it's advertised 3200Mhz
MrFisc replied to MrFisc's topic in CPUs, Motherboards, and Memory
I just updated my post, i think i have. The BIOS isn't super intuitive. -
I've got: CPU: Ryzen 5 1600 AF (12nm) Pinnacle Ridge RAM: G.SKILL Trident Z RGB 16GB 3200Mhz C16 Motherboard: ASRock B450m/ac For some reason no matter what I do, i cannot get my memory to operate at it's advertised 3200Mhz speed. For some reason, it's stuck at 2133 Mhz. I've tried putting the ram into A2, B2 and it simply doesn't post if i do that, or if it does it will only detect one of the sticks. I have to put them into A1 and B1 for them to even come up. I have a feeling that the DIMMs may be mislabeled? Or perhaps I'm misinterpreting something. I've already updated my motherboard bios to the latest version (see the provided CPU-Z "Mainboard" screenshot). I've tried enabling XMP in the bios, and i've tried changing the clock speed in the bios. It doesn't seem to do anything. But the BIOS isn't incredibly intuitive, maybe someone here knows how to use it better than I do? According to the motherboard specifications, it should support running at 3200Mhz The odd thing about this is that further down on that same page, they have this which indicates that pinnacle ridge isn't able to run at 3200 Mhz?
