Jump to content

Fast_N_Curious

Member
  • Posts

    407
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Awards

This user doesn't have any awards

About Fast_N_Curious

  • Birthday Sep 08, 1985

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Schenectady, NY
  • Interests
    Cars, computers, powersports

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. The boombox speaker on the left is not part of the system.
  2. Sorry forgot to include specs Yamaha RX-V863 400w A/V receiver x2 Klipsch 12" reference subwoofers x1 Logitech Z623 130w 8" subwoofer x1 Klipsch RC-62 II center speaker x2 Sony speakers (from sony lbt-zx66i) x2 Logitech THX satellite speakers x1 Tactile transducer
  3. So effectively a dual loop system with the liquid to liquid heat exchanger in the middle. Advantages of Liquid to liquid plate heat exchanger: -MUCH more surface area than a radiator. Many orders of magnitude more, especially with a 60 plate unit. -liquid to liquid heat exchange is much more efficient than liquid to air. Hence, I have a much higher delta T than most standard loops. -Very low restriction, so it wont impede loop flow rate. -Durable. I've had this heat exchanger frozen solid (on the outside) and it's strong enough to handle that no problem. PIC of heat exchanger and system.
  4. So I can get about 30 minutes of benching out of the 5 gallon bucket before it really starts to heat up and effect peak clocks, more if I leave everything outside.
  5. The bucket contains supercooled methanol (40%) @ -10*F and a 60 plate liquid to liquid heat exchanger. .. see pic below Other days I will bring the entire PC outside and use wireless mouse and keyboard to OC from the house. More context:
  6. Thanks. I forgot to tune the uncore ratio for this run It should have been able to hit at least 5.2-5.3GHz with the temps that night. Cooling system:
  7. Thank you. I was referring to the SP rating on later gen Intel processors, I should have pointed that out. However, I assume the theory stands?
  8. After a bit of research, I can see the SP score is an automated indication of potential silicon quality based solely on the voltage table, and it is USUALLY a good indicator, but it is still far from the final word on the matter. I've seen others reporting that supposedly lower-scored chips actually fared better overall. Like, when der8auer did his 12900KS review and he compared several chips on their max stable core clock, a mere SP80 12900K did 5.2ghz @ 1.274V, while a SP88 12900KS only did the same 5.2ghz @ 1.282V. It is my determination that SP is merely there for voltage efficiency and doesn't factor in processor scaling, hence, should not be used as a performance marker. Sure, the voltage my vary a bit between processor cores but not significantly enough to affect your overclock ceiling. Anyone else buy into this argument or am I way out in left field?
×