Jump to content

deadlucifer

Member
  • Posts

    10
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Awards

This user doesn't have any awards

About deadlucifer

  • Birthday Dec 06, 1999

Contact Methods

  • Twitter
    @techsavvy99

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Not on Earth
  • Occupation
    Student

deadlucifer's Achievements

  1. Thanks everyone will look at your suggestions
  2. Suggest me some products cause this is probably the only tech I don't have enough knowledge of
  3. the house is around 3000 sq.ft. I guess. I'll be hooking up a 200 Mbps network probably, also I have multiple IOT devices which means I need a stable af connection. I am planning to build a plex server too but that's for future. Inshort my WiFi speed might not be a lot but I need the fast Ethernet speed and yes all of the rooms have Ethernet cables. I think 1 access point will be enough for my setup cause mostly everything will be hardwired
  4. I am shifting to a new house soon (after the pandemic ends), looking to buy a new WiFi system. I don't want a normal consumer grade system. I saw Linus talking about how the professional grade system he installed makes huge difference and I am kinda interested in that unless it costs me a boatload of money, yeah I know it's gonna cost more than a normal mesh system but I am willing to pay the extra for the performance. Please suggest me some good not so expensive af solutions. I recently saw a video on ubiquiti dream machine, it looks good to me, has ton of features and great UI. I am interested in that kind of all in one device cause buying 3 seperate things ain't gonna be clean. Please drop me your suggestions open for all of those, also suggest me some good consumer ones if this doesn't work out. Thanks
  5. Hey I just saw this,New Alienware Monitor, apart from the look I don't think there's a difference. Buy: https://www.dell.com/en-us/member/shop/alienware-25-gaming-monitor-aw2521hf/apd/210-avlt/monitors-monitor-accessories Update: Just researched this, the 2521 (new one) has an IPS panel while the 2518 (old one) has a TN Panel Ref: https://www.ultrabookreview.com/34557-alienware-25-gaming-monitor/
  6. There probably won't be any ultrawide at this price range with 240Hz refresh rate, 1ms resopnse time. I would rather go for a 240Hz than a 144Hz ultrawide with low response time.
  7. It's just a personal preference, Alienware is a great choice too. ASUS have been making monitors since ages so that bends me a little more towards it. I love Alienware products too and it definitely looks way better than the ASUS one.
  8. My recommendation LG: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07R7636MH?tag=price145310f-20&ascsubtag=wtbs_5e863a0cde56fee0c5869992&th=1 Alienware: https://www.amazon.com/Alienware-25-Gaming-Monitor-Height-Adjustable/dp/B0733YCKM5/ref=sr_1_2?dchild=1&keywords=alienware+monitor&qid=1585855203&sr=8-2 ASUS: https://www.amazon.com/Adjustable-Function-Industry-warranty-XG27VQ/dp/B0772BK7BV/ref=sr_1_13?dchild=1&keywords=asus%2Bmonitor&qid=1585855308&sr=8-13&th=1 The asus and alienware has 240Hz refresh rate, also for 2 monitors its just a little over $600. Both of them are pretty good, personally i would go for 2 asus monitors
  9. One of the items that Intel is keen to promote with this launch is an update to its Intel RST algorithm when dealing with ‘Optane Memory’, Intel’s brand for Optane whereby a small amount of storage is placed in front of a larger drive to act as a fast cache. Up to this point, Intel platforms that supported Optane Memory in this configuration could only do so on the drive that was used to boot into the operating system. While this worked well for low-cost users that relied on a single rotational hard-disk drive of rust for their needs, with most enthusiasts using a fast SSD (SATA or PCIe) as their first drive that loads the OS, putting Optane Memory in front of this as a cache was relatively pointless – any gains would be intangible at best. With the new generation of products, Intel has expanded the capabilities of Optane Memory such that it can act as a cache for a non-OS drive. This means that a user can have a fast SSD boot drive, a large spinning drive for storage, and then place Optane in front of that storage drive to potentially get much better performance from the drive. The main idea here is that the large rotational drive is where users store games and large files used in content creation, which often have a long loading time. With the right caching algorithm, and a decent sized Optane Memory drive, Intel likes to promote that loading games and loading media for creative purposes are several factors faster than an equivalent system without an Optane Memory drive. Part of the news around Optane is that Intel is now creating new processor branding for OEMs that have configurations with Optane. The new brands and logos are similar to the standard Core i5/i7 style that we are used to, however the logos are now a dark blue with white text, and exhibit a plus after the Core i5/i7 name. So just to be clear, this is not a new line of processors. We will not have to suddenly deal with a Core i9+-8950HK being different to the non-plus counterpart. This is purely a branding exercise. However, to complicate things, this means that specification sheets can (and will) list the processors as Core i3+ and Core i7+ and even vPro models. This makes looking for particular processor versions in search engines a lot more difficult for almost no obvious benefit. I mean sure, Intel wants to promote the use of its Optane drives, but we already have the Optane branding and the Optane logos to do that for us. This ends up being another logo put onto the box. Ultimately, Intel is still marketing Optane, its high-cost R&D product, with low capacities at low cost systems with relatively little margin. While it might seem like a noble goal, to bring extra caching performance down to the lower cost segment, it could very easily be done with SATA or PCIe M.2 drives using regular NAND flash. A lot of users would like to see high-capacity, high-endurance Optane drives moving more into the mainstream, instead of more attempts at funneling in a product like Optane into caching. source :- https://www.anandtech.com/show/12607/intel-expands-8th-gen-core-core-i9-on-mobile-iris-plus-desktop-chipsets-and-vpro/5
×