Zrx18X

Ok, I accept it, express me badly. My apologies to KarathKasun, I just wanted to clarify that a 1050 Ti in stock was better than a GTX 670 without overclock, that's why I put the benchmarks. That a gtx 670 with overclock defeats a 1050 Ti that I do not doubt, in its time as you say, defeated a GTX 680 even a gtx 680 with manual OC ...

I do not have to look for shit, the one that has to search well is YOU. I have already given you several benchmarks and you continue with your contradictory shit. On the other hand I explained badly. Do not demand in that sense, if not ask. I expressed myself badly, but this does not matter anymore. I will not go on with this anymore. Fuck if you keep posting '' GTX 670 OC is waaay better tha 1050 Ti '' I leave this here.

With that attitude, you're demonstrating that I win. You are demonstrating that a GTX 670 needs overclock to beat the gtx 1050 Ti. '' Ill PM benchmarks to the OP and post them somewhere else. '' Of course mate, fuck it with that. At this point you will not get anywhere. Better leave this debate here.

You have shown me that you have a 1050 Ti, good. But you have not done what I demanded. Upload a video with the cards at your stock speeds (Without overclock), in a game and now you tell me who wins. I do not care if it's childish or not. Yes, anyone can raise the frequency to its GPU from the afterburner without even touching the voltage, but I still demand that you do a test with the speeds in stock. I want those tests of a 1050 Ti losing against a 670 in stock. It's that simple, the advantage of the GTX 670 against the 1050 Ti is the overclock, so let's remove that advantage.

First. Yes the GTX 680 and the GTX 770 are based on the same chip, except that you are letting go that the gtx 770 is a very overclocked version of the gtx 680, therefore the latter will perform better in most cases. Now let's leave aside the overclock, okay, the gtx 670 as well as the Kleper have better overclock range than the pascal, but now we are going to compare cards without manual overclock. Do you have evidence of a GTX 670 defeating a 1050 Ti other than the Userbenchmark xD? Even that according to you that you have both cards, why not upload a video that proves your theories? Also, do you have proof that you have a 1050 Ti? Because anyone on the Internet can say for example '' I have a gtx 1080 and a gtx 1080 Ti '' but in the end they only have one of these or worse, they have a gtx 1060 ... I have other tests from other sites by other side https://www.hardwareasylum.com/reviews/video/gv_n1050tg1-4gb/page11.aspx https://www.hardwareasylum.com/reviews/video/gv_n1050tg1-4gb/page12.aspx https://www.hardwareasylum.com/reviews/video/gv_n1050tg1-4gb/page10.aspx https://www.hardwareasylum.com/reviews/video/gv_n1050tg1-4gb/page5.aspx https://www.hardwareasylum.com/reviews/video/gv_n1050tg1-4gb/page9.aspx A curious fact is that the gtx 670 is very mediocre in some titles DX12 The page that leaves you in the links is the only one that I could find in which it is compared to a GTX 1050 Ti and a GTX 670, even though it does not surprise me since as I said the 1050 Ti is even better than an average of 680 ... https://www.techspot.com/article/1588-geforce-gtx-680-revisit/ The only games in which he loses the 1050 Ti is in For Honor and in Dirt 4, titles that curiously have worse performance in the Pascal I repeat, obviously a gtx 670 with a massive overclock exceeded a gtx 680 or even sometimes a gtx 770 in stock, which I repeat so you do not get confused, the GTX 680 and the GTX 770 use the same chip GK104 but this The last one is a gtx 680 with a massive overclock to the memory clock, thus leading to a greater bandwidth. Now what will you answer me? Because with what I have written above, it is more than clear that if we compare the 1050 Ti with the gtx 670 in stock or factory overclock, the 1050 Ti will always be better, unless a manual overclock is made to the gtx 670 to put it at your level or in some concrete cases, overcome it. You are also ignoring that the GTX 1050 Ti gains a lot in consumption and that it is much cooler than the gtx 670. So in the end, unless you leave REAL tests either, videos or images of a benchmark, not speculations, I'll think you're just a GTX 670 user trying to defend your card ... AH! and if you plan to upload a video comparing your GTX 670 and your GTX 1050 Ti (if you have one) do the tests with frequencies in stock I want to see in person as a GTX 670 defeat to a 1050 Ti.

Userbenchmark is not a good source for direct comparisons. Yes, it is better than other pages such as GPUBOSS, but still your results are still not 100% valid. For example, since when is an R7 260x better than a GTX 480 ? http://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-GTX-480-vs-AMD-R7-260X/3157vs3151! A gtx 750 Ti is better in general than a R7 260X and the GTX 480 is in turn better than these two. On the other hand, the 1050 Ti is faster than the gtx 670, its relative performance is between the gtx 680 and the gtx 770 https://www.techpowerup.com/gpudb/2885/geforce-gtx-1050-ti A much more reliable page like Techpowerup (the creators of GPUZ) say it. You can even look for many reviews where this is shown. YouTube channels like HarwareUnboxed or pages like Techspot, place the 1050 Ti on the gtx 680. You'll know then where is the gtx 670. Of course, the thing would be different if we overclock the gtx 670 (very close to the gtx 680), but since the difference between a gtx 670 and a 1050 Ti is 10%, if we overclock the 1050 Ti, the gtx 670 would continue to lose. Finally, going back to the Userbenchmark issue. The page itself is not bad, at all, but it is still more than an improved Passmark. Most of the benchmarks are purely synthetic and the benchmarks they place on games are not very credible, for example: http://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-GTX-770-vs-Nvidia-GTX-1060-6GB / 2174vs3639 If you go down to the section of the game benchmarks, you will see that between a gtx 1060 and a 770 in The Witcher 3 the difference in performance is only 17fps! Which is not possible since the 1060 is almost twice as powerful as the latter. Here is a Guru3d benchmark, page that has specialized in GPU benchmarks for years http://www.guru3d.com/articles-pages/geforce-gtx-1060-review.23.html There the difference in performance if it is close to double. I feel if I wrote too much, but I just wanted to make it clear that it is not very good to be guided by the Userbenchmark to compare. Even so the page is still good to check the overall performance of the system, just like a 3DMARK, but again, to compare not much ...