The Jewel of the Nile

I live in Poland and as with most of East Europe, we don't have any kind of net neutrality-like regulations, yet, or, more precisely, thanks to that internet prices are getting lower and lower for most of the consumers, while for some people with very specific needs prices are rising. Net Neutrality is giving more power to the government, which is not a good solution. In Poland, we have seen communism, which is ultimate form of government power over citizen, with our own eyes, and we can recognize some patterns in the west. Poland is not most capitalistic countries, but we see the difference and it is really huge. Some parts of economy are still almost socialistic, i.e. healthcare, thanks to that we can recognize how terrible healthcare in Canada is, but I know people in Canada are not able to see why is it happening, they still think that it's just a matter of choosing right people to be governed by. Well, the problem is that people who govern you do not have strong enough incentives to act in your favor. Actually, they have their own agenda and it's true that sometimes it aligns with some of the people, but even under communism some people were happy with it in Poland, because they were better off. It's fundamental asymetry behind rule of power. Those in power should not be granted more power for sure, even though they will do everything to trick us that they are working in our service. Granting more power to government to ensure fair competition is a fallacy, because only thing government will do is creating illusion of choice with artificial competition among lobbyist, and then serving lobbyist by setting laws and rules that make it more difficult for real competition to win.The other part of problem, more technical and complex, is lack of ability to allocate resources so peoples needs are satisfied under socialism or any other centrally planned regimes. It's economically impossible to allocate something that is scarce, like healthcare, food, shoes, or internet traffic processing power with one simple, centrally planned rule. People are very different, have very different needs, different ideas and solutions, they sometimes can't even manifest that by saying it loud, but they can do so by choosing right product on the market.

Desktop is not the best choice for me, unfortunately, because I have to move between office and home few times a week. Also, noise problem is in Bruce Wayne scenario only, because I'm going to use this mode in the office. In home I can have as much noise as I like with noise cancelling headphones on my head.

Hi, I'm looking for the right CPU for laptop my needs, two scenarios I need to handle: 1. Bruce Wayne: Average load, low noise, VR developement, Unreal Engine 4, with relatively low noise emissions. Even 7700HQ could handle that part 2. Batman: High load, high noise: Rendering, long compilations, VR gaming. 7700K is the best choice I think, but 7700 is ok as well I think My question is: Can I downclock / limit 7700K to run as cool and fast as 7700T (super power saving desktop one, but still better than 7700HQ) or at least 7700? I see that for 7700T TDP is 35W, for 7700 is 65W and for 7700K is 91W, but I know I can force 7700K to work with only 35W using i.e. ThrottleStop. Is there any point in choosing 7700T or 7700 over 7700K if I want to be able to limit heat and noise on demand? I think I'll go with Clevo P751dm2-g laptop because it can handle desktop CPU, while GPU part can be solved by 1070 GTX. Desktop CPU will be delided. Is it a good choice, or maybe am I looking in wrong direction?