Jump to content

Fat Stephen

Member
  • Posts

    2
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Awards

This user doesn't have any awards

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling
  • Location
    NC, in the year 1953
  • Interests
    breaking images and reassembling them, British English, the new monthly flavour of Oreos, the abstract concept of god, file hierarchy, absurdism, fonts, pure mathematics, metadata, AI & image dumps
  • Biography
    I'm a weird mutation of cells from Abby Hoffman, Gary Busey, Hunter Thompson, cast from Kids, Sylvia Plath, Cliff Stoll & Friedrich Jacobi
  • Occupation
    I cut up bodies and glue them back together

System

  • CPU
    Ryzen 5 1600X
  • Motherboard
    MSI B350 PC MATE
  • RAM
    4x HyperX Predator 8GB
  • GPU
    AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100
  • Case
    Whatever brand a 10gal tank at petsmart is
  • Storage
    Adata 256GB SSD, Seagate 2TB HDD
  • PSU
    Corsair HX1000W
  • Display(s)
    Optoma HD142X projector (main), Samsung 28" 4k monitor (projects), an LG Gpad I've got rigged as mini-touch screen monitor for gaming purposes, & a Wacom MobileStudio Pro (do those last 2 count as displays?)
  • Cooling
    submerged mineral oil
  • Keyboard
    custom Model M connected via bluetooth
  • Mouse
    Logitech Wireless Touchpad
  • Sound
    ASUS Xonar Phoebus ROG
  • Operating System
    Windows 10 Pro x64

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Fat Stephen's Achievements

  1. Right, so my buddy just inherited a house from his uncle who was one of those old school computer geeks & we've been cleaning out his stuff. One thing that we found was at least 30 computers from the mid-90s in fairly decent shape all things considered & it got me thinking: aside from there not being a motherboard w/ a bazillion DDR1 slots, is there a reason why there couldn't be a contemporary PC w/ 8gb of RAM w/ 16 512mb cards? On the surface, these maths check out in my head even tho I know it won't be the same performance bc DDR1. However, I have this feeling in my gut that even an i3 wouldn't know what to do with them, but I don't understand why.
  2. I've posted this a few places, but I figured posting here wouldn't hurt. The more seeds you plant, the more likely they're to bear fruit n such. TL;DR - Is there a way to auto-tag an MP3's metadata as soon as it's downloaded? Long Version: OK, so it started when I was beginning to get frustrated with the fact that there's virtually no cross-platform support between Windows 10 & Android when it comes to podcasts. I listen to quite a few on my phone, my laptop, & my rig that's connected to my surround sound. It was annoying to sign up for a new podcast on one device, only to realize I had to sign up on all my devices individually. After some digging, I decided to get rid of Grover Podcast from my laptop & PC in favour for gPodder's python tool that automatically downloads the MP3s of the cast, and I'll just play it through a media player. Cool! Except I'm anal when it comes to media players. I need my metadata tagged efficiently in order to sleep well at night, and almost every podcast I listen to doesn't handle their metadata very well. (shout out to "BBC's The Digital Human" for having the best tags). Most of these were easy to ignore as I didn't plan on having the files on my computer for very long, however, there is one thing that bugs the living hell out of me & that's the ones that have no metadata, especially the genre tag. The genre tag is how I've been able to directly find podcasts as the most common genre in these podcasts is "podcast". So, what I'm wondering is if there's a program or something in visual studio, python etc where if an MP3 is downloaded to a general folder it will automatically tag the genre as "podcast"?
×