Pratigious

Thanks man.

I was wondering if I could put this GPU https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B08CYDH8MD/ref=ox_sc_act_image_2?smid=ATVPDKIKX0DER&psc=1 Into this PC right here: https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B01LZLPO1H/ref=ox_sc_act_image_1?smid=A2TFSBJQN1TZCK&psc=1 I'm not concerned with power. I'm just wondering if it'll fit. I've seen videos with other Dell Optiplex running games with 240 watt psus.

How much faster do you think icelake will be compared to coffelake? Between Kabylake and skylake to Coffelake, upgrading from those two CPU's don't seem worth it at all, especially with these prices. Do you think the same performance difference between Skyelake and kabylake to coffelake will be the same?

I also consider a cpu that costs 250$ midrange and any cpu that costs 300 dollars or more high-end.

If you look at the performance increases in GPU's across the years vs CPU's, there's a major difference. The GTX 1060 despite being a mid-range card is equal, maybe possibly faster than the GTX 980 and it also costs less. If we look at the I7 4790k vs the I5 7600k, the I7 4790k is still faster. Why isn't the I5 7600k faster than I7 4790k? The GTX 1060 was released a year after the GTX 980 and it's faster. If Im not wrong, the same thing applies to the RX 580 and RX 480, those are faster than the R9 390X after just a year. I also consider the RX 580 and 480 mid range GPU'S, they're more comparable to the GTX 1060, you don't go wrong buying either one.

Can Intel turbo boost technology work on all cores for a cpu? I have an I5 4690k so like assuming temps are low, can I get 3.9 GHZ on all cores?

Kaby lake is faster than skylake. That's all im saying. No matter how negligible the increase was, it's still faster and newer. But yeah I see what you mean. There wasn't much of an increase so my rule isn't always true. I bought a I5 4690k in the beginning of 2017 because it was cheaper than the I5 7500k and I5 6600k at the time, lol.

Icelake is launching in the second half- of 2018. I highly doubt there will be a massive performance increase. If you want to get it now, coffelake, go ahead. You won't be missing much and that cpu will be good for a damn long time. If you're one of those people that always want high end ultra graphics with high frame-rate, above 60, then uh you do you. I think you should go for I7 8700k.

Depends on your rig. If you anything below haswell, I'd recommend it but if you have skylake or kaby lake, I don't recommend upgrading. Also, that mentality is bad. TThere will always be something better and newer.

Do you guys intel will do this? AMD is supporting AM4 socket all the way up to 2020. Do you guys think we might see a massive performance increase if this did happen? I don't understand why intel releases new socket's so frequently and with little performance gains. Right now I have a I5 4690k. If I were to upgrade to an I7 8700k, how much of a performance increase would i see? What about from I5 4690k to I5 8600k? I checked this out this right here http://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i7-8700K-vs-Intel-Core-i5-4690K/3937vs2432 And it is said I'd see a 36% performance increase. Is this accurate? And right here for the I5 8600k it would be a 27% performance increase. http://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i5-8600K-vs-Intel-Core-i5-4690K/3941vs2432

That got me thinking. Apparently AMD said they're supporting AM4 socket all the way up to 2020 but for some odd reason I can't shake the feeling intel will either make icelake require a new socket or b make you require a certain series of motherboard with the same socket, like coffeelake.

Why are there no benchmarks with emulators? Im sure many people use emulators.

My bad, I meant I5 8600k.

As of now I have a I5 4690K, is upgrading from this I5 to the I5 8600k worth it or should i wait? How high of a performance boost would i get? And one last question, when do you guys think a CPU upgrade is justified? As in how much of a percentage boost would you need for a new cpu to be considered upgrading?

Oh, thanks guys.