Jump to content

PMSJ98

Member
  • Posts

    9
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Awards

This user doesn't have any awards

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

PMSJ98's Achievements

  1. I am building a pc with a ryzen 5 1600 (no integrated graphics), but I don't have a video card right now. Will the coumputer output a video signal through the motherboard hdmi conector?
  2. Thank you all, I just saw what it was
  3. I'm mounting a PC and I found this case cable, does anyone know what it is?
  4. Thanks for turning this into a battle between i5s and i7s instead of replying to my question
  5. How many games that take an advantage of ht, appart from battlefield 1 and watchdogs 2, can you name?
  6. Well, if i was going to do video editing, that would be a great idea i think. But hyperthreading doesn't give you a lot of advantage in games, so the 7600k is better for gaming, since it can reach higher clockspeeds.
  7. I know it has better stock clocks, so it performs better. But my question was, as they perfom equally when they have the same frequency, which one would reach a 4,5 ghz overclock with lower temps, since my cooling won't be great
  8. Hello! I'm planning to get a new gaming pc. I will be using the raijintek aidos (simmilar to the 212 evo or 212x) for cooling, and I am not sure if I should use a 7600k or a 6600k as a cpu. Here's the thing: they're pretty much the same price, and also same performance with same frequencies. I'm planning on overclocking only a little bit, because I'm very limited with cooling. I would be happy with 4.4/4.5 ghz, and I don't know which one would be better for that. I know 7600k can easily get to 5 ghz with water cooling, but temperatures are generally higher due to bad thermal paste. So, which one do you think would give that 4,5 ghz with lower temperatures? Thank you for replying.
×