Memes11

thanks for the feedback, I was expecting the performance of the 2 partitions to be lower, though I question what "crap" means. As I said, the needs are rather low. Could you give more insights? I already looked into UnionFS, it bothers me a bit that it does not allow redundancy (at least, I did not saw that), same for mhddfs. BTRFS has issues on RAID5/6, that does not make me feel confident to store my TB of data on it. Last solution, SnapRAID is a nice one, I did not know it, thanks for the pointer, I specifically like the fact that they are build with media server as main target Thanks for that

yes, you need a NAS, but you can also DIY it. I would recommend the commercial NAS if you either want a dead simple administration and/or have space constraint (physical space), a DIY NAS is indeed more difficult to size optimize though you can still find some pretty sweet case. As for the admin, it also depends on your choice, but as far as I know, Freenas is not that difficult. If I may link to Brian Moses' blog, he has some nice recommendations (although, I do not agree with him on the RAID configuration). The link : http://blog.brianmoses.net/2016/09/diy-nas-econonas-2016.html his build leaves you with almost 200 CAD left in your budget.

down votefavorite As ZFS is not perfectly workable with my wish, I looked into mdadm + LVM, it seems to all work out but I would like to get external advice/confirmation. The situation : now using 3x4TB RAID5 using MDADM, filled at 5.5TB, forecast to grow shortly and put pressure to extend. extra disks available 1x1TB, 1x2TB, 2x3TB the NAS (Ubuntu 16.10, CPU:i3-2120T, 16GB RAM) is used in home environment and we have limited computing needs, mostly want enough space to have all medias in one place for the Plex server (running on the same machine) and just enough power to manage that and the couple of shared files beside that. There is as well Crashplan running. 4 SATA ports on the motherboard (used up by the 3x4TB and SSD for OS) and one PCIe x4 to 4x SATA3.0 card on its way to add more SATA ports. The plan : (4TB + 4TB + 4TB) RAID5 => /dev/md0 (already in place) (1TB + 2TB) RAID0 => /dev/md1 (2TB disk would then be splitted in two 1TB partitions to allow the RAID0) (3TB + 3TB + /dev/md1) RAID5 => /dev/md2 Then create LVM pool on /dev/md2 copy all data from /dev/md0 to /dev/md2 (I can move a couple hundred GB to the laptop or external HDD if /dev/md2 is too small). format /dev/md0 add /dev/md0 in the LVM group enjoy my 14TB LVM + RAID5 array (give or take some overhead) now come the questions Is that possible at all? what are the risks of such implementation? I see here both /dev/md0 and /dev/md2 being 1 disk fault tolerant, /dev/md1 being just a cheap way to avoid buying a new disk so I do not see much of an increased risk compared with the existing situation (except the fact that I have now 2 arrays). Any specific care for the migration process? Performance-wise, what is the expected overhead, if any, compared to my existing 3x4TB RAID5 (mdadm) setup? How difficult would that be to replace /dev/md1 by a physical 3TB disk later down the road? How portable is that storage pool? (I will surely replace sooner or later the Motherboard+CPU+RAM when I go for a 4k TV ) So, will that be possible to move all those disks to a new system? Concerning the expansion, if I just add a 4TB drive in /dev/md0, will LVM handles this properly and gives me the extra 4TB in the pool? My plan is rather to either replace one of the arrays by one with bigger disks or to add another 3 disks array in the pool (physical space will then be the concern). Thanks already