andymur

Well me, i am proud of all my parts!

dalekphalmthank you for your input however i use raid (true only two ) long time and knock knock .ever had a problem. anyhow i am out for this and will wait for next gen. ssd-s,to answer your q. there is many apps where they benefit a lot from ultra fast storage. Samsung announced 3,000MB/s enterprise SSD pcie, also 12gb/s is around the corner.

Maybe for gaming not however for applications that need will be also dramatic increase in performance. Maybe 8 of these http://www.hgst.com/ultrastar-ssd800mm :wub: and 12 gb/s hba

Greetings everyone, The question is not yes or no to raid 0 but which eight 60-64 gb ssd-s ((to keep price down, (and yes ussually bigger ssd-s are better performers)) to use to have greatest, biggest, fastest performance? ... Cause in the ssd-s performance can vary a loooot.Now i am running two Coarsair GT 60gb in raid 0 and numbers are not great firstly i can thank this to the integrated marvell controller on my motherboard. Lets take todays they say top Samsung 64gb R: 550MB/s • W: 520MB/s • Random 4K R: 86000IOPS • Random 4K W: 78000IOPS, Plextor M3 : R:510MB/s (SATA 6Gb/s) •W: 210MB/s (SATA 6Gb/s) • Random 4K R: 70000IOPS and Kingston mS200 60gb R: 550MB/s • W: 520MB/s • Random 4K R: 86000IOPS • Random 4K W: 78000IOPS ....and now , what is advertised are peak performance data, however i came to conclusion when looked into average or sustained performance ratio the data are in same cases not even similar...so would anybody have suggestion which eight 60-64 gb ssd-s to get? I am leaning towards Kingston mS200 60gb however i am not convinced thats a good choice - no deeper reviews yet. It is the cheapest,Plextor M3 by far most expensive. . Between the mentioned Samsung and Plextor Plextor is better performer So again would anybody have suggestion for a choice of best round sustained performer between a sea of ssd-s in 60-64gb range? ...Linus whats yur poison for eight ssd raid solution? ... and when are we gonna see performance data :lol: ?