Jump to content

Scullz

Member
  • Posts

    8
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Awards

This user doesn't have any awards

Scullz's Achievements

  1. Guys you keep forgetting this is a G-sync monitor; the hertz will be caped and linked on a 1:1 ratio to whatever FPS he is outputting with his hardware... Sadly right now on most eye candy games, there isn't anything that will output steady 100hz at this resolution with high/max settings. THERE is some stuff averaging 50 but thats about it... Maybe when PASCAL card comes out with HBM the 34" IPS 100hz G-sync dilemma will be solved.
  2. I think his humor went completely over your head (To run this monitor you need a GTX 1440 Ti, so you gotta wait for it)
  3. Don't you know the 27 YEARLY dollars extra needed have huge impact; whilst discussing GPU's that cost $700 on the spot and will be replaced in 1-2 years ?!?!
  4. I was blinded by the 34 inches; you are right. However, I am pretty sure Acer already made it, theres a monitor that they haven't provided information for which is supposed to be identical to their G-sync coming up but it has NO G-sync, so people presume it is the freesync counterpart. I think we should feel lucky the GFX cards battle is going to happen (is happening) before these hit the market though so we at least have hardware to drive them at decent prices... Already gonna be minimum $800 for the panel more like up to 1200... drop 2 980 TI's or 2 Fury X's and we could be up to $2,500 already.
  5. No offense (I know it has an extra 6 gigs) but I personally feel this point is null, no? I mean it is already a known fact the Titan X is irrelevant to compare it to a 980 TI...The 980 TI can outperform the TITAN X and it has already been proven time and again on many benches...Am I missing something??... In fact, a couple of OC'ed Titan X's have not overclocked past 1450 clocks... 980 TI's are pushing over 1500 STABLE...
  6. I'm pretty sure the monitor is already out.
  7. Unless you are running SLI (and even if you are in some cases) I'm not sure how 4GB is "lots" for 4k when every benchmark and their mother's running 4k w MOST eye candy turned on are hitting 20-50 depending on game.... So no, I'm not gonna be maxing out a 4k panel with a single 4gb GPU any time soon or 6 for that matter...
  8. Pruxis, I think you might be better off checking out what Freesync and G-sync are and how they work specifically. Also, there are a few monitors coming out soon even from ASUS which are all ultra wide, IPS, curved with undisclosed refresh rate at this time. G-sync will pretty much render the high refresh rate useless in these panels as far as I am concerned. I'm personally hoping for 75 ghz refresh rate as that will most likely be the max due to current limitations on the panel and other technology being used (you can search the ASUS forum to see JJ's explanation as to why the limitations are in place in detail). Personally I can't wait for ASUS and ACER to battle it out soon on the feature vs price point margins and of course the Linus reviews!!!!!!!..... Asus 34" Ultra Wide “ROG 34″ Curved Gaming Monitor” Is what I am waiting for. Also keeping in mind once you have this; you will need the hardware to drive it which should fall on the ballpark of 2 GTX 980 TI's or run single (my preference) and sacrifice on some eye candy down the road. Here's the full list of new G-Sync monitors coming down the pipe. (Resource: PCgamer) Model Resolution Size Panel Refresh Asus PG279Q 2560x1440 27 IPS 144 Hz Acer Z35 2560x1080 35 VA 144 Hz Acer X34 3400x1440 34 IPS 75 Hz Asus PG34Q 3400x1440 34 IPS 60 Hz Acer XB271HK 4K 27 IPS 60 Hz Acer XB281HK 4K 28 TN 60 Hz Asus PG27AQ 4K 27 IPS 60 Hz
×