Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited


This user doesn't have any awards


About Bloodkil933

  • Title
  • Birthday 1993-09-18

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location
    North Wales, UK


  • CPU
    AMD Ryzen 7 3700X @ 4.25GHz
  • Motherboard
  • RAM
    4x8GB Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO @ 3200MHz
  • GPU
    MSI GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Gaming X TRIO
  • Case
    Lian Li O11 Dynamic XL
  • Storage
    Samsung 970 EVO 1TB NVMe SSD & Samsung PM961 500GB NVMe SSD & Samsung HD103SJ 1TB HDD & Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB
  • PSU
    SuperFlower Leadex GOLD 1300W
  • Display(s)
    Acer Predator Z35P & 2 x Samsung S24F356FHU
  • Cooling
    Custom WC - Optimus Foundation AMD CPU Block + EK Vector Trio GPU Block + 3 x 360mm Corsair XR5 Radiators
  • Keyboard
    Corsair Gaming K95 RGB Mechanical Gaming Keyboard
  • Mouse
    Logitech G502 Proteus Spectrum RGB
  • Operating System
    Windows 10 64Bit

Recent Profile Visitors

914 profile views
  1. I have 32GB of Corsair Vengeance PRO RGB RAM which has Samsung B-die chips, it is clocked at 3200MHz with the timings seen below. It seems a bit slow for what it should do, or is it fine? The CPU is a Ryzen 7 3700X Any help is appreciated.
  2. I run my 2 x 4GB 290X's just fine at 4K 60fps in 80% of games, please show some evidence before make stupid claims that 4GB is an 'epic fail'. But yet you don't seem to fathom that Nvidia are charging almost £1000 for a card that isn't exactly a game changer and doesn't use HBM.
  3. Just FYI, the mods just banned him for 7 days for that, then decided to remove it...
  4. The only thing that doens't work yet is the video recording and playing and that's it which I don't use anyway, so i'm happy!
  5. Flashed 5.0.2 CM12 onto my Xperia Z1 and have to say i'm wholly impressed, battery life is a lot better and phone seems a lot faster!
  6. Hey all, For some reason both of my 290X's are downclocking during gaming and causing large stutters, clocks can range anywhere from 600-1000. The temperatures on both card barely exceed 60C, same for the VRM's Any ideas? Thanks
  7. This ^ 290X is the better choice for higher resolutions because of it's much larger memory bus, and can also be picked up very cheap
  8. I gave an opinion, not facts. Also, why the hate? Don't hate what you can't appreciate, and besides, it's good for both sides, competition is what makes for a market. Intel and Nvidia monopoly is something that's bad for everyone, unless you want higher prices on crap CPU's and GPU's? Please stop with this AMD hate vendetta, it's so childish, if you really don't like a brand, then be constructive when you do it, don't just flame and insult people because you don't agree with them. The fact you keep trying to dig up dirt about people just shows everyone how pathetic you're being.
  9. This just seems something an immature fanboy would do. 'Let's dig up dirt because I'm upset that Nvidia got made to look bad'
  10. Turns out it is an issue with DisplayPort when running 200mV+ as it's fine on DVI. Cheers anyways
  11. Whenever I run 3DMark I get a black screen (still has a signal) and both cards seem to power up as usual (Xfire 290X). Both cards are at stable overclocks (1200/1650) that I have had them do many times before without issue. Any ideas?
  12. I like how anyone here who dare's jump on the AMD bandwagon get splattered by uneducated and arrogant fanboys. The exact reason I am barely trawl this forum anymore. Yes, however Nvidia worded it, whether it was intentional or not, basically misled the consumer they were thinking they were getting a card with 4GB of GDDR5 memory running at 225GB/s. Whether it affects people or not is irrelevant, as Gaben said, you cannot lie to gamers as they will call you out on it and never forget it.
  13. Of course, i mean, at least they admitted it. Unlike Ubi
  14. I'm not arguing with you, they 'lied' or 'miscommunicated' as you'd like to call it, a large company like Nvidia shouldn't be making rookie mistakes like that. Let's not end up with another 'Ubisoft PR nightmare' kind of case. They should've made it clear on the specification and to the reviewers that the last 512MB is accessible at a much slower speed.