Jump to content

TechSavyJew

Member
  • Posts

    23
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Awards

This user doesn't have any awards

TechSavyJew's Achievements

  1. http://pcpartpicker.com/p/7GGFHx Officially redone with almost a complete overhaul of parts ^w^
  2. Also this seems to be a wealth of info on it http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3152444/posts
  3. http://wccftech.com/amd-20nm-gpus-horizon-tsmc-ramps-20nm-production/ http://wccftech.com/amds-carrizo-apu-a10-8890k-cpuz-hexacore-20nm/ http://www.overclock.net/t/1504354/guru3d-20nm-amd-carrizo-apu-spotted-features-fm3 Well I could be wrong so here's this one http://www.extremetech.com/computing/176919-amd-leak-confirms-that-excavator-apu-will-be-28nm-and-that-some-production-is-moving-back-to-globalfoundries
  4. in terms of 2015 Intel will be at 14nm while AMD would be moving down to either 22nm or 20nm for it's Processors and GPU's , took awhile to get there , but AMD also has plans to move down to 16nm on a few products sometime between 2016 and 2017 , while AMD seems to be less powerful in terms of nm process they are bridging the gap in Architectural failures with their new architecture set to be released either in 2015 or 2016 ( sources could be wrong , but multiple sites have said this so it seems like trustworthy info )
  5. if my sources are correct then AMD should be staying at the 20nm process for most products and has plans to move down to 14nm after a little while , Intel would most likely be nearing the end of the 14nm era , but never the less AMD would be catching up , AMD seems to finally be putting the pedal to the metal and attempting to make well made products for the low - medium High markets , in essence it would effectively be cutting alot of funding from Intel's cpu market , if it can pull it off it can Drag Intel down while pulling itself up like it did in the Old days , Intel would make a new High class Processor and AMD would make a lower cost and almost as powerful product that targeted lower budgets ( im talking old old Days )
  6. on notebooks it is ._. , they had issues with it because the notebook maker kinda throttled it down to near haswell levels
  7. I honestly just hope that one day AMD and Intel will fuse together to make a super beast of a Company , but right now Intel is in the lead by a huge margin , AMD seems to be strapping on rockets at the moment while Intel gloats , and even if it's 3 years from now .... How much will Intel have changed it's architecture ? a boosted 20% ? Broadwell was only a measely 3-4% performance upgrade from haswell , things seem a little bleak for Intel , they seem to not notice that they will soon be beating a dead horse Architecture , I don't really like Intel because they tend to play it safe and not really try new architectural ideas , AMD was told that it's Modular cores were damn near impossible , but they achieved it , regardless of the poor performance they did it , AMD take's risk , Evolution is all about risk , sometimes it's a severe miss and sometimes it's a industry shaking Hit. AMD seems to really get this concept while Intel just seems to be solely focused on Single threaded performance , you can only go so far with that
  8. with VISC and MRAM under AMD's belt as major clusterF***ing bombs I suspect things could really change dramatically in the future for AMD , the test VISC processor already beat the shit out of Haswell , it crushed haswell by an incredible 51% include MRAM as a replacement to DRAM ( fairly certain it's DRAM in all modern Processors ) and you have a massive Rapage bomb set to detonate some time in the future , the FM2+ board doesn't seem like it's honestly going to be a massive platform for any big changes that AMD will have , but I see a bright future for AMD *-*
  9. Honestly I will try to fit an i7 or even a top model i5 into the build , it might just be safer to get an i7 or i5 build and save up to buy a FM2+ build , I really was hoping to get a crack at AMD's newest Architecture , but fine ..... no 860k * cries a little *
  10. I know that i5's smoke the FX series and then go on to sip some tea before they Blow up even more benchmarks , this was mostly due to an inferior architecture and a bigger nm process , I have heard rumors and confirmed plans for new processors with whole new Architectures , I plan on upgrading the processor down the road to a even more capable processor. The whole reason I was going with the 860k was because of that one upgrade as well as HSA being used in the design of the Kaveri Processor. This is going to be a huge upgrade for me anyways , I don't plan on gaming over Ultra 1080p on any game , not that into graphics , but If it can run the Unreal Editor fairly well then imma go with the 860k
  11. they get kinda trigger happy with lawsuits , the moment they find even a minor infraction on a patent they sue like hell , also their processors seem a little overpriced for half of the top end processors
  12. I have heard rave reviews on other tech sites about Corsair and the quality / Customer service , im mostly wishing to get some DDR3-2400 ram so that I can overclock to open it up farther if I would later need the performance push.
  13. hmm , alright , I will definitely reconsider my choice of PSU , thank you very much
  14. i5 yes are damn amazing , but honestly It has had some issues in the past that just worries me , also i7's are said to be much better than i5's , also the 860k ( Kaveri stripped of GPU ) has had good reviews and so has the Kaveri Processor , My main goal is to shoot for the ability to use the Unreal Editor , either 3 or 4
  15. I know that at least earlier i5 Processors had an issue with how they dispersed heat
×