Jump to content

filorigo

Member
  • Posts

    16
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Awards

This user doesn't have any awards

Recent Profile Visitors

469 profile views

filorigo's Achievements

  1. Living in Italy it was a bit harder to check for updates but still a great fun and opportunity!

    Thanks again to LTT for this awesome giveaway!!! You guys are awesome!

     

    I still don't get where the winners were announced!

    1. Freddieboy

      Freddieboy

      It's in the original post!

    2. ybyhhh

      ybyhhh

      It's even more difficult in China actually!!!

  2. Hi everybody! Few days ago I got a server rack from an office but I cannot find its brand and specs, can anybody give me a help? I'll attach a photo of the logo. It is 200x104x62 cm. Thanks for your help.
  3. this is what the instructions on the box say
  4. Hi everyone, I have an acer 5739G, it's original battery doesn't go over 5% even after many "full-charge-discharge cycles". Few days ago I got a new Lavolta supported battery and it has the very same problem. This is what I did: -got the new battery, put it in the laptop (turned off) and let it charge for the night. -then un-plugged and turned the laptop on: it said the remaining battery was 6% but I didn't worry, the battery is supposed to arrive fully discherged; I let the laptop drain the battery until it turned off -re-charged it for the night once more and a few hours in the morning. when I turned it on (unplugged), battery level was still 6% (?!?!?!). -drained the battery once more; but this time re-charged it while turned on: --when it got at 6% the charging light turned from orange (charging) to blue (full) and the win10 icon says: "6%, connected but not charging" I run a win10 battery report and it says: MANUFACTURER SIMPLO SERIAL NUMBER 2455 CHEMISTRY LION DESIGN CAPACITY 48 mWh FULL CHARGE CAPACITY 726 mWh which means that either the battery has a lower capacity (64.4 mAh) (which I duobt) or it doesn't fully charge. Here is the website I used to convert capacities: https://milliamps-watts.appspot.com/ Does anyone have an idea about what's happening? ohh, here's some more data that may help: SYSTEM PRODUCT NAME Acer Aspire 5739G BIOS V0.3306 08/24/2009 OS BUILD 10586.17.amd64fre.th2_release.151121-230 Thanks for support. Have a great day.
  5. This giveaway is going to be EPIC!!! username: filorigo videos: https://www.vessel.com/videos/JYZEYDYx0 https://www.vessel.com/videos/P7U9FOT4G shares: https://www.facebook.com/filippo.rigobon/posts/10203817541343804?pnref=story google+
  6. Sorry, my bad... I totally agree with aliendejoe: That 34" (34UM65) will be very low pixel density while it's bigger brother (34UM95) will be much better. This is what I''l do: -if I had the money I'll get 34UM95 -if your budget cannot get that high I'll probably go for the BenQ With a 980 you shouldn't have problems anyways.
  7. LG: I think Linus said enough about this one, if I had the money it would be my choice for too many reasons... BenQ: Looks to be a very nice monitor more suitable for photo-editing that gaming because of its 10-bit panel and its quite high pixel density (109PPI). The amount of actual pixels lower because of its narrower shape, resulting in a higher frame rate but with a narrower filed of view while gaming. Movies are shot in 21:9 (cinematic aspect ratio) and resulting in black bars on a 16:9 panel. Samsung: at a first quick analisys I would say the same as for the BenQ but keeping in mind that it does look to have 10-bit color depth. And the panel is a VA vs the BenQ being an IPS. Acer: The same as for the Samsung. Consider I'm obviously not an expert but this what I could figure out in 20 minutes surfing. Certainly the LG is the best choice for both productivity, gaming and some "image" editing, but it is around 33% heavier to play with. The BenQ is a very nice monitor and should offer very sharp images and allow you to play with a higher frame rate/higher settings bbut with a norrower field of view.
  8. I totally agree with and u got the point. Now I have another question for you; do you think the Asus PB298Q (€399 the cheapest i colud find in IT) is worth the extra 100€ vs the LG (€299 the cheapest i colud find in IT) i found?
  9. filorigo

    21:9 vs 16:9

    Hi guys, I'm plannig to have a little upgrade. I have a 21" full HD monitor now that is a quite bad and old one so i want to get a new one to use as main and keep this one as a secondary. Mainly I use photo/video-editing programs (I'm not a pro at all), CAD and play some games. I found the ASUS VX279Q (around 250€) as a possible buy but then surfing I saw this one: LG 29UM65-P (350€). Is the ultra-wide LG worth the extra money? Considering I'll keep my old 21" anyway, will I have any advantage buying the 21:9 19" over the 16:9 27" one? Which are the pros and cons of the two? Does anyone have those two monitors? Do you guys have any other monitor I should look at? Forgive my english and thanks for the help. these are Linus's reviews: ASUS VX279Q (it is basicly the same one but with a better frame, speaker and other thinks) LG 29UM65-P
  10. Thanks guys for another giveaway!!! My favourite? That cooler looks amazing. I want to see if that different design is as quiet as it looks it can be.
  11. That card is insane!!! Like the carbon look, I only wish it was real carbon... Awesome review guys!!!
  12. Guys your videos are amazing!! a lot fun to watch and interesting! I learnt so much for you and got into pc hardware that i'm starting my own hobby-job building up computers.
×