Jump to content

Changing mouse settings improved my game fps

porina

As a bit of history on this one, I was tinkering with my system for other reasons last weekend, and since then it felt a bit off. I changed so many things I couldn't simply undo it all. Now, I'm not sure I fixed everything, but I came up with interesting observations. Key parts of system for gaming are 8086k stock, 1080Ti factory OC, 1440p 144Hz G-sync monitor. My main timesink game is FFXIV, so that's all I tested with. I was finding, in some situations, the game became much more laggy than it used to. fps tanked.

 

After much experimentation, I found moving the mouse quickly would drop the fps to half or less normal. In one test spot, it typically was around 80fps if I left it alone. Moving the mouse quickly, it would drop to 40. It's a Logitech G403 "gaming" mouse so I downloaded the software for it. Changing the polling rate seemed to have fixed that specific observation. It was set to 1000 times a second. Reducing it to 250, I get maybe 5fps drop at most now. Lowering it further to 125 didn't seem to help further.

 

I'm guessing, with lots of fast mouse movement, the USB was sending so many commands to the system/game it was consuming resources and taking them away from the game. It doesn't explain everything, as mouse settings were not touched during the tinkering last weekend.

 

It makes me wonder now, if this applies to other games also. Or is it specific to how FFXIV handles it? Might this apply to the keyboard too? 

Main system: i9-7980XE, Asus X299 TUF mark 2, Noctua D15, Corsair Vengeance Pro 3200 3x 16GB 2R, RTX 3070, NZXT E850, GameMax Abyss, Samsung 980 Pro 2TB, Acer Predator XB241YU 24" 1440p 144Hz G-Sync + HP LP2475w 24" 1200p 60Hz wide gamut
Gaming laptop: Lenovo Legion 5, 5800H, RTX 3070, Kingston DDR4 3200C22 2x16GB 2Rx8, Kingston Fury Renegade 1TB + Crucial P1 1TB SSD, 165 Hz IPS 1080p G-Sync Compatible

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mouse Polling rate is like your monitor refresh rate, the higher it is, the more times it updates the movement/image

 

Having it lower means you PC works less to update the mouse position, having anything over 250 is generally aimed at professional eSports and such, for home gaming and minor competition, 250 Hz polling rate should be fine

 

As a conclusive comment, the polling rate affects your system as the mouse is trying to update at 1000~ times per second @ 1000mhz polling rate

the lower the polling rate, the less cpu resource is needed for the mouse

~~~ MY RECENTLY UPDATED RIG ~~~

CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 2700

MOBO: ASUS Prime B450M-A

GPU: ASUS RX580 Dual 8 GB

RAM: 4 x 8GB Team T-Force Vulcan 2666Mhz

Cooling: Corsair Hydro Series H150i Pro RGB

PSU: Silverstone 80+ Platinum 750W Fully Modular

Case: Cougar Panzer Dual Tempered Glass

Storage: Samsung 840 500GB 2.5" SSD

Storage: SanDisk 240GB 2.5" SSD

Storage: LiteON 240 GB 2.5" SSD

Storage: Toshiba 3TB 7200rpm 3.5" HDD

 

PC Part Picker list:

https://au.pcpartpicker.com/list/4bH3V6

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Dufsao14 said:

As a conclusive comment, the polling rate affects your system as the mouse is trying to update at 1000~ times per second @ 1000mhz polling rate

the lower the polling rate, the less cpu resource is needed for the mouse

That's what I said :) I do wonder why I'm only just noticing an impact now though if I hadn't previously. Something else might be taking more resource, so the extra load from this may become significant. Time to buy an 8 core...

Main system: i9-7980XE, Asus X299 TUF mark 2, Noctua D15, Corsair Vengeance Pro 3200 3x 16GB 2R, RTX 3070, NZXT E850, GameMax Abyss, Samsung 980 Pro 2TB, Acer Predator XB241YU 24" 1440p 144Hz G-Sync + HP LP2475w 24" 1200p 60Hz wide gamut
Gaming laptop: Lenovo Legion 5, 5800H, RTX 3070, Kingston DDR4 3200C22 2x16GB 2Rx8, Kingston Fury Renegade 1TB + Crucial P1 1TB SSD, 165 Hz IPS 1080p G-Sync Compatible

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, porina said:

That's what I said :) I do wonder why I'm only just noticing an impact now though if I hadn't previously. Something else might be taking more resource, so the extra load from this may become significant. Time to buy an 8 core...

What I'm saying is most likely wrong, but maybe using a PS2 mouse will also gain you some performance compared to a USB mouse due to how each of the interfaces work.

CPU: Intel Core i7-950 Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R CPU Cooler: NZXT HAVIK 140 RAM: Corsair Dominator DDR3-1600 (1x2GB), Crucial DDR3-1600 (2x4GB), Crucial Ballistix Sport DDR3-1600 (1x4GB) GPU: ASUS GeForce GTX 770 DirectCU II 2GB SSD: Samsung 860 EVO 2.5" 1TB HDDs: WD Green 3.5" 1TB, WD Blue 3.5" 1TB PSU: Corsair AX860i & CableMod ModFlex Cables Case: Fractal Design Meshify C TG (White) Fans: 2x Dynamic X2 GP-12 Monitors: LG 24GL600F, Samsung S24D390 Keyboard: Logitech G710+ Mouse: Logitech G502 Proteus Spectrum Mouse Pad: Steelseries QcK Audio: Bose SoundSport In-Ear Headphones

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×