(Official?) Battlefield V with RTX benchmark

[pas008]

31 minutes ago, M.Yurizaki said:

Literally at this point, the only complaint I'll accept is NVIDIA's charging too much for this tech. Which I think they are.

 

Everything else is just repeating history.

to be honest

we have had 1200 dollar card for over 2 yrs (1k card for 6yrs)

 

i'm sure their market analysis knows they can go at this price

just like apple and iphone shit

[Froody129]

Everyone: "WE WANT A NEW CRYSIS, SOMETHING THAT PUSHES BOUNDARIES"

 

Game Devs: *adds Raytracing* 

 

Everyone: "HOW CAN YOU ADD A TECHNOLOGY THAT OUR CARDS STRUGGLE TO RUN EVEN THOUGH IT LOOKS GOOD" 

[Mira Yurizaki]

16 minutes ago, Froody129 said:

Everyone: "WE WANT A NEW CRYSIS, SOMETHING THAT PUSHES BOUNDARIES"

 

Game Devs: *adds Raytracing* 

 

Everyone: "HOW CAN YOU ADD A TECHNOLOGY THAT OUR CARDS STRUGGLE TO RUN EVEN THOUGH IT LOOKS GOOD" 

But this:

[D13H4RD]

My opinion is the same as before. 

 

As in that it's not yet going mainstream but it should evolve over time 

 

If you're after pure FPS, I don't think you should be excited as of now

[Brooksie359]

14 hours ago, sazrocks said:

1. This isn't playable at the resolutions people with 2080tis have (1440p, 4k)

2. Honestly that doesn't look any better than normal render technology with reflection.

I have a 240hz 1080p monitor and a 2080ti so I would have to disagree. Granted I also have a 4k monitor as well. 

[Brooksie359]

11 hours ago, Morgan MLGman said:

This graph is a lot more interesting IMO. I mean, who's going to buy an RTX 2080Ti and play on a 1080p monitor? That's like buying a supercar and driving it with a 60MPH speed limiter of some sort.

Even at 1440p, the performance is barely over 40FPS with anything over DX12 + DXR Low enabled. At 4K, it's unplayable beyond that threshold. Note that this is a 1000$+ GPU that's marketed as a 4K GPU I don't remember Nvidia mentioning that it's only a 4K GPU if you don't use the ray-tracing features that they also market these cards with.

That would be me. Got my 1080p monitor ready to try it out. 

[Brooksie359]

5 hours ago, aezakmi said:

benchmarking in 1920x1080 with THAT card? they gotta be fucking kidding, even my 14 year old monitor has a higher resolution.

 

no sane person would spend $2000 on a card to play on 1080p, I think whoever owns a 2080Ti has AT LEAST a 2160p screen.

 

 

The card is 1200 not 2000 and I for one will be playing at 1080p. 

[moderategamer]

15 hours ago, Zandvliet said:

Hi all,

 

Sorry if this is already posted somewhere, but I coulnd't find it.

 

As far as I'm concerned this is fine I see Ray Tracing more as a beauty thing more suited to single player or people that are perfectly happy playing online 60fps (this includes me btw) I'm still blown away by the tech and can't wait to see how developers put it to use. I mean BFv is the latest in game engine technology and we have a card that can run it in 60fps using Ray Tracing … Ray Tracing that's nuts. That's film territory and it's only Nvidia's first crack at it. I personally couldn't give a crap about > 1080p gaming or high refresh rate gaming I don't need it I don't want it I'll take the accurate lighting / reflections just my thoughts though I know 90% of you will disagree.

[xAcid9]

4 pages and zero RTX On vs RTX Off images. I read it look AMAAAZEEEBAWLLL with RTX On.  Read

[asus killer]

isn't exactly because the cards struggle to go beyond 1080p at acceptable frame rates with rtx on that they decided to remove SLI from the coffin? i would say they are thinking of doing SLI to get 4k and RTX.

[Speakerator]

17 hours ago, TOMPPIX said:

 

https://www.guru3d.com/news-story/battlefield-v-raytracing-features-are-now-enabled.html

 

17 hours ago, voiha said:

DRX Medium : 64.5fps
DRX High: 66.4fps
DRX Ultra: 65.3fps

How is this possible ? Am I misunderstanding something ?

 

Looks like there is an issue with the application of the settings. I found a test on a german site that says, that the medium settings do not always apply properly:

 

From: PC Games Hardware (German) in my humble translation:

Quote

[...] It is important to take notice that - according to NVidia, there is a bug when changing to the medium setting resulting in in not beeing applied properly. To successfully change to the medium preset, first the 'low' preset has to be select before changing to the 'medium' one.[...]

Possibly Tom's didn't follow this through, because their results look rather different (Interactive statistic, can't embed that properly here.

 

 

[Bayonett Priest]

8 minutes ago, asus killer said:

isn't exactly because the cards struggle to go beyond 1080p at acceptable frame rates with rtx on that they decided to remove SLI from the coffin? i would say they are thinking of doing SLI to get 4k and RTX.

but if you buy 2 2080 tis and use nvilink dont you wase around 600 bucks cause of the nv-link shitty limit! why cant they improve that first!

[asus killer]

3 minutes ago, Bayonett Priest said:

but if you buy 2 2080 tis and use nvilink dont you wase around 600 bucks cause of the nv-link shitty limit! why cant they improve that first!

like rtx on games i expect that to be something they will be working on with time. Let's face it whoever buys an RTX card is a beta tester.

[leadeater]

7 minutes ago, Bayonett Priest said:

but if you buy 2 2080 tis and use nvilink dont you wase around 600 bucks cause of the nv-link shitty limit! why cant they improve that first!

NVLink is the improvement from the even more shitty HB SLI bridge,

[Bayonett Priest]

Just now, asus killer said:

like rtx on games i expect that to be something they will be working on with time. Let's face it whoever buys an RTX card is a beta tester.

first: i knwo i am but i was hiting 30 fps with my 980 ti in cod

second: true battlefield was worked on and then nvidia came and said: " hey we have new technology implememt it quickly!"  lets see when games come out that have rtx integrated into the game than instead slapped on!

third: with updates maybie it will run better!

[Bayonett Priest]

Just now, leadeater said:

NVLink is the improvement from the even more shitty HB SLI bridge,

still youre throwing halve the second gpu out the window!

[leadeater]

2 minutes ago, Bayonett Priest said:

still youre throwing halve the second gpu out the window!

Better than throwing 66% of it out the Window . Multi GPU really needs to be handled at the game engine and graphics API level to make proper use of more than 1 GPU.

[Bayonett Priest]

4 minutes ago, leadeater said:

Better than throwing 66% of it out the Window . Multi GPU really needs to be handled at the game engine and graphics API level to make proper use of more than 1 GPU.

i dont know too much about gpus but when both gpus share the same power like nvi-link on crack to 100%! wouldnt that be better for games as well( i meant implementation rather than fps)! would that even be possible? i think i can remember the new quadro have more nvi-link headers right! why not on the rtx cards?

[leadeater]

28 minutes ago, Bayonett Priest said:

i dont know too much about gpus but when both gpus share the same power like nvi-link on crack to 100%! wouldnt that be better for games as well( i meant implementation rather than fps)! would that even be possible? i think i can remember the new quadro have more nvi-link headers right! why not on the rtx cards?

It's not actually a bandwidth problem, actual NVLink can't be used for games (as it stands). SLI is used across the NVLink, the technique is unchange even though the connector and fabric has. SLI always has a master and slave GPU and the master does a significant amount more and certain tasks have to run before work on the 2nd GPU can be done, there's a lot of loss because of that.

 

If you move multi GPU up to API/Game Engine you can just treat GPUs as work units and throw work at them how you like, no master slave and no dependencies beyond what you have in your own code.

[Carclis]

4 hours ago, Brooksie359 said:

I have a 240hz 1080p monitor and a 2080ti so I would have to disagree. Granted I also have a 4k monitor as well. 

And are you happy with the image quality increase that ray tracing has brought, especially for the performance cost? Does it warrant the price jump from $700 to $1200?

[jasonvp]

12 hours ago, leadeater said:

If you move multi GPU up to API/Game Engine you can just treat GPUs as work units and throw work at them how you like, no master slave and no dependencies beyond what you have in your own code.

Which is what will happen in this case, assuming Dice decides to support it.  DXR won't be done with SLI, it'll be done with mGPU.  That's because DXR is a DX12-only thing, and SLI no workie in DX12.

 

We have to wait and see what their roadmap is when it comes to mGPU.  Assuming there is a roadmap for it...

[aezakmi]

15 hours ago, Brooksie359 said:

The card is 1200 not 2000 and I for one will be playing at 1080p. 

the card is 4000 where I live so there's no difference imo

 

a kidney is 3300 in the black market

 

[leadeater]

2 hours ago, jasonvp said:

and SLI no workie in DX12

SLI does work with DX12, DX12 has many multi GPU modes which in my view is kind of not the best thing as it gets confusing quickly as to what is being talked about.

[Brooksie359]

13 hours ago, Carclis said:

And are you happy with the image quality increase that ray tracing has brought, especially for the performance cost? Does it warrant the price jump from $700 to $1200?

It depends on who you ask. Honestly 4k doesn't really seem worth it to alot of people as well but there are many who will say it's well worth the extra cost. 

[Brooksie359]

2 hours ago, aezakmi said:

the card is 4000 where I live so there's no difference imo

 

a kidney is 3300 in the black market

 

Yes there is. If there isn't then the price between a 1080ti and 2080ti is insignificant. I mean if price doesn't matter then the 2080ti is the only gpu worth buying and apparently you say it doesn't matter.