Jump to content

You should be fine. The 1070 ish performance range is where that CPU tops out though, so an upgrade to a haswell i7 would also benefit you, like a 4770k

I WILL find your ITX build thread, and I WILL recommend the SIlverstone Sugo SG13B

 

Primary PC:

i7 8086k - EVGA Z370 Classified K - G.Skill Trident Z RGB - WD SN750 - Jedi Order Titan Xp - Hyper 212 Black (with RGB Riing flair) - EVGA G3 650W - dual booting Windows 10 and Linux - Black and green theme, Razer brainwashed me.

Draws 400 watts under max load, for reference.

 

How many watts do I needATX 3.0 & PCIe 5.0 spec, PSU misconceptions, protections explainedgroup reg is bad

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes. My i5 6600 was bottlenecking my 480 in overwatch, so I got an i7. I couldn't maintain 144 fps even with everything on low. It'll be even worse for you. 

CPU i7 6700 Cooling Cryorig H7 Motherboard MSI H110i Pro AC RAM Kingston HyperX Fury 16GB DDR4 2133 GPU Pulse RX 5700 XT Case Fractal Design Define Mini C Storage Trascend SSD370S 256GB + WD Black 320GB + Sandisk Ultra II 480GB + WD Blue 1TB PSU EVGA GS 550 Display Nixeus Vue24B FreeSync 144 Hz Monitor (VESA mounted) Keyboard Aorus K3 Mechanical Keyboard Mouse Logitech G402 OS Windows 10 Home 64 bit

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ivan134 said:

Yes. My i5 6600 was bottlenecking my 480 in overwatch, so I got an i7. I couldn't maintain 144 fps even with everything on low. It'll be even worse for you. 

Something's wrong with your PC, big time!

I have an i5 4690k with an R9 390 and my overwatch is maxed at 120fps (using FRTC) on High settings. My old GTX 970 ran overwatch at 80+ Fps.

My wife's PC is an i5 6500 (non K) with a GTX 970 and she's always at 60fps (limits of her monitor) on High preset. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Kc7vwc said:

Something's wrong with your PC, big time!

I have an i5 4690k with an R9 390 and my overwatch is maxed at 120fps (using FRTC) on High settings.

max at 120fps is not the same as getting min 144fps. at that fps you're usually cpu limited.

| Intel i7-3770@4.2Ghz | Asus Z77-V | Zotac 980 Ti Amp! Omega | DDR3 1800mhz 4GB x4 | 300GB Intel DC S3500 SSD | 512GB Plextor M5 Pro | 2x 1TB WD Blue HDD |
 | Enermax NAXN82+ 650W 80Plus Bronze | Fiio E07K | Grado SR80i | Cooler Master XB HAF EVO | Logitech G27 | Logitech G600 | CM Storm Quickfire TK | DualShock 4 |

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Spaiden said:

i just wanted to say i have no problem at not reaching 144fps i am gonna upgrade my cpu next year anyway. My only question is just will my cpu bottleneck the vega 56 to a point where i cant play at 80fps or 60 fps 

It really depends on what games you are playing. Maybe try to list the games, then the performance of cpus in those games can be checked. Some games really don't mind about the cpu and some hog it hard. Good example of this are games like cities skylines where you fps is pretty much tied to the cpu once you city gets to a certain size. Same applies for other simulation games like that. But for FPS like battlefield you can get away with much slower cpus as most of the work is not using the cpu.

Gaming Rig:CPU: Xeon E3-1230 v2¦RAM: 16GB DDR3 Balistix 1600Mhz¦MB: MSI Z77A-G43¦HDD: 480GB SSD, 3.5TB HDDs¦GPU: AMD Radeon VII¦PSU: FSP 700W¦Case: Carbide 300R

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Madgemade said:

It really depends on what games you are playing. Maybe try to list the games, then the performance of cpus in those games can be checked. Some games really don't mind about the cpu and some hog it hard. Good example of this are games like cities skylines where you fps is pretty much tied to the cpu once you city gets to a certain size. Same applies for other simulation games like that. But for FPS like battlefield you can get away with much slower cpus as most of the work is not using the cpu.

I am mainly playing FPS so my cpu shouldnt be a problem then

Link to post
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Spaiden said:

I am mainly playing FPS so my cpu shouldnt be a problem then

60 FPS with highest details is not unreasonable for this CPU/GPU combo.

I WILL find your ITX build thread, and I WILL recommend the SIlverstone Sugo SG13B

 

Primary PC:

i7 8086k - EVGA Z370 Classified K - G.Skill Trident Z RGB - WD SN750 - Jedi Order Titan Xp - Hyper 212 Black (with RGB Riing flair) - EVGA G3 650W - dual booting Windows 10 and Linux - Black and green theme, Razer brainwashed me.

Draws 400 watts under max load, for reference.

 

How many watts do I needATX 3.0 & PCIe 5.0 spec, PSU misconceptions, protections explainedgroup reg is bad

Link to post
Share on other sites

Really shouldn't be unreasonable. I can play BF1 maxed out at 1080p on a 5 year old R9 290 and 3rd gen intel. If vega can't do 1440p on a gen newer cpu then somehing is wrong. I used to play bf4 at 1440p maxed out and still got 60fps most of the time. You will have no problem.

 

Do have a look around before you buy. I have seen some places where vega 64 is actually cheaper than 56! so don't just assume 56 is cheaper.

Gaming Rig:CPU: Xeon E3-1230 v2¦RAM: 16GB DDR3 Balistix 1600Mhz¦MB: MSI Z77A-G43¦HDD: 480GB SSD, 3.5TB HDDs¦GPU: AMD Radeon VII¦PSU: FSP 700W¦Case: Carbide 300R

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Madgemade said:

Really shouldn't be unreasonable. I can play BF1 maxed out at 1080p on a 5 year old R9 290 and 3rd gen intel. If vega can't do 1440p on a gen newer cpu then somehing is wrong. I used to play bf4 at 1440p maxed out and still got 60fps most of the time. You will have no problem.

 

Do have a look around before you buy. I have seen some places where vega 64 is actually cheaper than 56! so don't just assume 56 is cheaper.

alright thanks for the tipp

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×