Jump to content

Nvidia shares rtx 2080 4k performance numbers

Superwotman

IGN just shared some new RTX marketing material. This looks very good but it is still marketing and no 3 Party Benchmarks hope we will see some trustworthy Benchmarks soon.

Quote

Though it's not the 4K 144Hz demon most of us hoped for, it seems like the Turing GPUs will provide a decent boost over Pascal, with the added bonus of ray tracing and DLSS on select titles, with more coming out in the future. As always we can't wait to test a Turing GPU ourselves so we can get some "real" numbers, and hopefully we'll be doing just that in the very near future.

TuringVsPascal_EditorsDay_Aug22.jpg

 

 http://www.ign.com/articles/2018/08/22/nvidia-shares-rtx-2080-4k-performance-numbers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

But are those highest settings or adjusted?
If maxed out, then performance gains should be impressive. If adjusted, gains are not that impressive, around 10-15% faster than 1080 Ti

Ex-EX build: Liquidfy C+... R.I.P.

Ex-build:

Meshify C – sold

Ryzen 5 1600x @4.0 GHz/1.4V – sold

Gigabyte X370 Aorus Gaming K7 – sold

Corsair Vengeance LPX 2x8 GB @3200 Mhz – sold

Alpenfoehn Brocken 3 Black Edition – it's somewhere

Sapphire Vega 56 Pulse – ded

Intel SSD 660p 1TB – sold

be Quiet! Straight Power 11 750w – sold

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

The "normal " Performance isn't so impressive but if the DLSS works as they promise (up to 2x 1080) and im not sure about that the new cards will be impressive.  

I hope they will show a 1080 TI vs 2080TI  comparison soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Quadriplegic said:

But are those highest settings or adjusted?
If maxed out, then performance gains should be impressive. If adjusted, gains are not that impressive, around 10-15% faster than 1080 Ti

 

2 minutes ago, valdyrgramr said:

Ya, are they even looking at the charts in every game when they claim 2x the 1080?  Cuz uh Wolfenstein 2, Hitman 2, and a few others there isn't 2x times the performance.

When all is said and done, I think it'll be closer to 30% uplift by tier.

 

https://www.techspot.com/article/1551-pubg-graphics-benchmarks/page2.html

 

The PUBG result looks to be almost exactly the same as with the 1080 Ti on the 2080. The DLSS looks to be offloading a lot of the computationally expensive effects onto the Tensor Cores. (This requires the Async Compute, but it's the right idea. Though this is going to require per-game optimization, I imagine.)

 

FPU performance doesn't look to be increased directly, but it looks a lot like they'll be fed better (they were memory starved previously, in the higher SKUs?) with the ability to run a parallel pipeline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd like to wait and see. if the 2080 is as impressive as they make it out to be I'll upgrade... 2080Ti is out of the question for me

AMD Ryzen 3950x under a Noctua D15S, 32 Gb G Skill FlareX 3200 DDR4 running at 3200 CL14, Gigabyte Aorus Pro 570 Wifi, Gigabyte 2070 Super hooked to a Dell U2718Q 4k HDR monitor & an Acer 1440p 144hz IPS panel of some kind, an Inland 1 TB M.2 PCIE 4 main drive, a Samsung NVME M.2 250Gb, WD Blue 500Gb  and 1 TB SSDs, Corsair RMX750, Rainbows and butterflies...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are clearly hiding something bad.  Otherwise it would only BENEFIT them to release detailed reviews and details.  It would further drive sales if the new price points are worth it.  But I am willing to bet they are not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looking at the game choice, the HDR bit I find interesting. FPS doesn't drop in a linear fashion. 4K is 4 times the resolution of 1080p, however games normally only drop around 50%. What it's always meant is the bottlenecks for 4K are different than 1080p. (CPU is also massively less of an issue at 4K.) It strikes me Nvidia also found some interesting ways of dealing with those bottlenecks. Especially if the GPU class was designed to handle that.

 

Nvidia is shifting much more to offloading tasks to specialized units within the GPU, so it'll be interesting to see how things are handled. And how things go in legacy games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Given the Async nature of the GPU pipeline, I think Vulkan & DX12 will see a larger uplift than DX11 gaming will. Which is probably what's really going on.

 

Also, the DLSS sounds great, but how much visual quality are you giving up?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Superwotman said:
The "normal " Performance isn't so impressive but if the DLSS works as they promise (up to 2x 1080) and im not sure about that the new cards will be impressive.  

I hope they will show a 1080 TI vs 2080TI  comparison soon.

That's comparing apples to oranges. The proper comparison would be between the 1080 Ti and the 2080, and the Titan Xp and 2080 Ti. The 2080 Ti is filling the space in the GeForce lineup previously held by the Titans. The Titans are now part of the professional lineup with the Quadros.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Battlefield 1 on a 1080 at 4k does 60 fps (50~70). 

 

Far Cry 5 in the 40 fps range.

AMD Ryzen 5800XFractal Design S36 360 AIO w/6 Corsair SP120L fans  |  Asus Crosshair VII WiFi X470  |  G.SKILL TridentZ 4400CL19 2x8GB @ 3800MHz 14-14-14-14-30  |  EVGA 3080 FTW3 Hybrid  |  Samsung 970 EVO M.2 NVMe 500GB - Boot Drive  |  Samsung 850 EVO SSD 1TB - Game Drive  |  Seagate 1TB HDD - Media Drive  |  EVGA 650 G3 PSU | Thermaltake Core P3 Case 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

DLSS must bypass some really questionably optimized rendering improvement effects to get up to 80% uplift in some of the titles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Locutus494 said:

That's comparing apples to oranges. The proper comparison would be between the 1080 Ti and the 2080, and the Titan Xp and 2080 Ti. The 2080 Ti is filling the space in the GeForce lineup previously held by the Titans. The Titans are now part of the professional lineup with the Quadros.

That is true but they compared the 2080 with the 1080 instead of the 1080ti so they will probably compare the 1080ti and the 2080ti

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

no comparison to current gen, still gonna guess it's a <15% boost from Pascal.

5950x 1.33v 5.05 4.5 88C 195w ll R20 12k ll drp4 ll x570 dark hero ll gskill 4x8gb 3666 14-14-14-32-320-24-2T (zen trfc)  1.45v 45C 1.15v soc ll 6950xt gaming x trio 325w 60C ll samsung 970 500gb nvme os ll sandisk 4tb ssd ll 6x nf12/14 ippc fans ll tt gt10 case ll evga g2 1300w ll w10 pro ll 34GN850B ll AW3423DW

 

9900k 1.36v 5.1avx 4.9ring 85C 195w (daily) 1.02v 4.3ghz 80w 50C R20 temps score=5500 ll D15 ll Z390 taichi ult 1.60 bios ll gskill 4x8gb 14-14-14-30-280-20 ddr3666bdie 1.45v 45C 1.22sa/1.18 io  ll EVGA 30 non90 tie ftw3 1920//10000 0.85v 300w 71C ll  6x nf14 ippc 2000rpm ll 500gb nvme 970 evo ll l sandisk 4tb sata ssd +4tb exssd backup ll 2x 500gb samsung 970 evo raid 0 llCorsair graphite 780T ll EVGA P2 1200w ll w10p ll NEC PA241w ll pa32ucg-k

 

prebuilt 5800 stock ll 2x8gb ddr4 cl17 3466 ll oem 3080 0.85v 1890//10000 290w 74C ll 27gl850b ll pa272w ll w11

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, xg32 said:

no comparison to current gen, still gonna guess it's a <15% boost from Pascal.

The 2080 has 15% more CUDA cores than the 1080. At minimum, it should get around that uplift, but it's also go some new architectural improvements and much faster memory. It's going to be around 25-30%. Some games that really benefit from Async could see a lot more. Catch is, are they actually faster than the card price tier they're replacing? You can get a 1080 on Newegg right now for 450USD. 400USD if you take an open box one. 1080 Ti is 650USD with an open box option at 580USD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Taf the Ghost said:

DLSS must bypass some really questionably optimized rendering improvement effects to get up to 80% uplift in some of the titles.

As far as i read the Quality of DLSS 2x can be compared with 64x Super Sampling. And they use their SATURN-V-Supercomputer to train their Deep Learning Networks. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×