i7-9700k and i9-9900k price confusion

[Bayonett Priest]

i saw in some news that the new cpus are around 450+, but are i9s realy that cheap? the ones i found are always at 1000+! is the bottom price of 450+ refer to the i7.9700k? cause i want to build my balls to the wall gaming pc worth 3000+

and i think a 1000 bucks expensive i9 is i think too expensive. and is the i7-9700k without hyperthreading better than the 8700k?

[3 Lions]

These aren't even out yet.

[Bayonett Priest]

Just now, LinusTechTipsFanFromDarlo said:

These aren't even out yet.

i know i just want to have some advice if a i9 processor is gonna even be selled at 450. im a technewbie

[AskTJ]

They are not released, therefore no price can be given.

[MrShinny]

its juuuust speculation.

 

Just like how I am speculating about what the hell you just wrote.

 

Edit: misspelling

 

[AskTJ]

Just now, Bayonett Priest said:

i know i just want to have some advice if a i9 processor is gonna even be selled at 450. im a technewbie

No way.

[SeanAngelo]

23 minutes ago, Bayonett Priest said:

i saw in some news that the new cpus are around 450+, but are i9s realy that cheap? the ones i found are always at 1000+! is the bottom price of 450+ refer to the i7.9700k? cause i want to build my balls to the wall gaming pc worth 3000+

and i think a 1000 bucks expensive i9 is i think too expensive. and is the i7-9700k without hyperthreading better than the 8700k?

they're not out. we don't know.

[seon123]

Mobile I9 ≠ mainstream I9 ≠ HEDT I9

[DarkSmith2]

depends how hard intel wants to compete with prices to AMD. i9 will probably be way faster than a 2700x. But if they would want to demolish AMD they would sell it for ~350 (old i7 price) and the i7 for ~250 (old i5 price). But from knowing Intel.. they will cost a little premium thats why a ~450 speculation is decent on the mainstream plattform. 

 

But i also think that it isnt going to be much more than 450-500. Else it wouldnt be competition right?..