Jump to content

Unsure about my recent x470 Master SLI/AC mobo purchase

I just bought the parts to my new rig and I was pretty excited to see a “12 phase” Power design on a mid-tier board. I’m reading on now that it’s not at all what I thought it was, and it’s actually a 4+2 that’s doubled? I really liked the x370 Taichi that I built my girlfriend’s editing computer with so I figured that this was a decent brand.

 

my real question here is this: will I  be able to OC my rig and not be limited by the VRMs on the board?

 

parts:

R5 2600 (I intend to make multiple OC Profiles, one of which will be its’s max frequency)

 

corsair h115i

 

Asrock x470 Master sli/AC

 

corsair HX1200i platinum (never buying another psu again)

 

saphire rx580 8GB black edition

 

16 gb of g.skill trident z rgb 3200mhz c14

 

 

Am I being paranoid? Or is this a legitimate concern? If I do need to get a different one, what board should I get? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

That board would still be a decent overclocker, it just depends on your cpu silicon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Rainbow Dash said:

That board would still be a decent overclocker, it just depends on your cpu silicon.

So I don’t need to worry about any potential heat problems?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CarolinaRoots said:

So I don’t need to worry about any potential heat problems?

Not really, if it does get warm, which it would. Just blow a fan on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Rainbow Dash said:

Not really, if it does get warm, which it would. Just blow a fan on it.

That could prove to be an issue due to the case I got. I planned on watercooling everything at some point in the near future with what would be my first custom loop. I got the Lian-Li PC011Dynamic, the one that Der8aur helped design. Great for watercooling, not so much for direct fan access to the VRMs lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CarolinaRoots said:

That could prove to be an issue due to the case I got. I planned on watercooling everything at some point in the near future with what would be my first custom loop. I got the the Lian-Li PC011Dynamic, the one the Der8aur helped design. Great for watercooling, not so much for direct fan access to the VRMs lol

I wouldn't really worry about vrm cooling unless they go up to 100C.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Rainbow Dash said:

I wouldn't really worry about vrm cooling unless they go up to 100C.

Okay, I’ll keep an eye on the temps. Most motherboards come with decent sensors for the VRM temps now right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CarolinaRoots said:

Okay, I’ll keep an eye on the temps. Most motherboards come with decent sensors for the VRM temps now right?

Yeppers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Rainbow Dash said:

Yeppers.

Well thanks, I guess I was worrying about nothing! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CarolinaRoots said:

Okay, I’ll keep an eye on the temps. Most motherboards come with decent sensors for the VRM temps now right?

yep

Good luck, Have fun, Build PC, and have a last gen console for use once a year. I should answer most of the time between 9 to 3 PST

NightHawk 3.0: R7 5700x @, B550A vision D, H105, 2x32gb Oloy 3600, Sapphire RX 6700XT  Nitro+, Corsair RM750X, 500 gb 850 evo, 2tb rocket and 5tb Toshiba x300, 2x 6TB WD Black W10 all in a 750D airflow.
GF PC: (nighthawk 2.0): R7 2700x, B450m vision D, 4x8gb Geli 2933, Strix GTX970, CX650M RGB, Obsidian 350D

Skunkworks: R5 3500U, 16gb, 500gb Adata XPG 6000 lite, Vega 8. HP probook G455R G6 Ubuntu 20. LTS

Condor (MC server): 6600K, z170m plus, 16gb corsair vengeance LPX, samsung 750 evo, EVGA BR 450.

Spirt  (NAS) ASUS Z9PR-D12, 2x E5 2620V2, 8x4gb, 24 3tb HDD. F80 800gb cache, trueNAS, 2x12disk raid Z3 stripped

PSU Tier List      Motherboard Tier List     SSD Tier List     How to get PC parts cheap    HP probook 445R G6 review

 

"Stupidity is like trying to find a limit of a constant. You are never truly smart in something, just less stupid."

Camera Gear: X-S10, 16-80 F4, 60D, 24-105 F4, 50mm F1.4, Helios44-m, 2 Cos-11D lavs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, CarolinaRoots said:

 

my real question here is this: will I  be able to OC my rig and not be limited by the VRMs on the board?

Things to clarify:

 

More phases = better voltage ripple suppression. If you're overclocking Ryzen on air, just 4 phases will allow you to hit 99% of the CPU's potential. Ryzen is limited by GlobalFoundaries crappy process, not voltage. The 'more phases = better' rule applies to Intel CPUs and FX, just not Ryzen.

 

Doubled phases means it gets doubled current limit, but same voltage ripple suppression. Current flow per phase affects heat output, but not voltage ripple

 

Compared to a true 8 phase design, the doubled 4 phase has same temperatures, but slightly worse voltage ripple. I wouldnt be worried about VRM cooling at all.

CPU: i7-2600K 4751MHz 1.44V (software) --> 1.47V at the back of the socket Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 (BCLK: 103.3MHz) CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-D15 RAM: Adata XPG 2x8GB DDR3 (XMP: 2133MHz 10-11-11-30 CR2, custom: 2203MHz 10-11-10-26 CR1 tRFC:230 tREFI:14000) GPU: Asus GTX 1070 Dual (Super Jetstream vbios, +70(2025-2088MHz)/+400(8.8Gbps)) SSD: Samsung 840 Pro 256GB (main boot drive), Transcend SSD370 128GB PSU: Seasonic X-660 80+ Gold Case: Antec P110 Silent, 5 intakes 1 exhaust Monitor: AOC G2460PF 1080p 144Hz (150Hz max w/ DP, 121Hz max w/ HDMI) TN panel Keyboard: Logitech G610 Orion (Cherry MX Blue) with SteelSeries Apex M260 keycaps Mouse: BenQ Zowie FK1

 

Model: HP Omen 17 17-an110ca CPU: i7-8750H (0.125V core & cache, 50mV SA undervolt) GPU: GTX 1060 6GB Mobile (+80/+450, 1650MHz~1750MHz 0.78V~0.85V) RAM: 8+8GB DDR4-2400 18-17-17-39 2T Storage: HP EX920 1TB PCIe x4 M.2 SSD + Crucial MX500 1TB 2.5" SATA SSD, 128GB Toshiba PCIe x2 M.2 SSD (KBG30ZMV128G) gone cooking externally, 1TB Seagate 7200RPM 2.5" HDD (ST1000LM049-2GH172) left outside Monitor: 1080p 126Hz IPS G-sync

 

Desktop benching:

Cinebench R15 Single thread:168 Multi-thread: 833 

SuperPi (v1.5 from Techpowerup, PI value output) 16K: 0.100s 1M: 8.255s 32M: 7m 45.93s

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Jurrunio said:

Things to clarify:

 

More phases = better voltage ripple suppression. If you're overclocking Ryzen on air, just 4 phases will allow you to hit 99% of the CPU's potential. Ryzen is limited by GlobalFoundaries crappy process, not voltage. The 'more phases = better' rule applies to Intel CPUs and FX, just not Ryzen.

 

Doubled phases means it gets doubled current limit, but same voltage ripple suppression. Current flow per phase affects heat output, but not voltage ripple

 

Compared to a true 8 phase design, the doubled 4 phase has same temperatures, but slightly worse voltage ripple. I wouldnt be worried about VRM cooling at all.

That’s a solid answer. 

 

So to clarify: with the 4 phases that are doubled, I have the power output and temps of an 8 phase but not the ripple suppression? And I wouldn’t have any problems with ripple anyways?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, CarolinaRoots said:

So to clarify: with the 4 phases that are doubled, I have the power output and temps of an 8 phase but not the ripple suppression?

Yes

 

12 minutes ago, CarolinaRoots said:

And I wouldn’t have any problems with ripple anyways?

Wont be enough to hurt the overclocking of a Zen and Zen+ based processor. Maybe it will hurt overclocks in the future if GF fixes their manufacturing process, but I'm not a fortune teller.

 

The disadvantage of higher ripple is using higher vcore to maintain stability. Let's say I have a Ryzen CPU that stablizes at my 4GHz overclock with 1.35V, assuming no voltage ripple at all. If the VRMs provide current with 50mV voltage ripple, then I need to set the core voltage (vcore) to at least 1.4V to ensure voltage to the CPU never dips below 1.3V. If I get a crazy good mobo with only 10mV ripple, then I can set the Vcore to 1.36V.

 

In terms of overclocking higher, lower voltage ripple is better. Say the same CPU does 4.1GHz at 1.4V. If I do it on the 50mV ripple motherboard, then I'll need 1.45V which is too high for ambient cooling. On the other hand, the 10mV ripple mobo will let me use 1.41V, which is fine. Sadly, this doesnt benfit Zen+ based CPUs because the extra voltage needed to get past 4.3GHz wall is so high, the effect of low voltage ripple board doesnt help enough to allow a higher clock speed without breaking the voltage safety limit.

CPU: i7-2600K 4751MHz 1.44V (software) --> 1.47V at the back of the socket Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 (BCLK: 103.3MHz) CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-D15 RAM: Adata XPG 2x8GB DDR3 (XMP: 2133MHz 10-11-11-30 CR2, custom: 2203MHz 10-11-10-26 CR1 tRFC:230 tREFI:14000) GPU: Asus GTX 1070 Dual (Super Jetstream vbios, +70(2025-2088MHz)/+400(8.8Gbps)) SSD: Samsung 840 Pro 256GB (main boot drive), Transcend SSD370 128GB PSU: Seasonic X-660 80+ Gold Case: Antec P110 Silent, 5 intakes 1 exhaust Monitor: AOC G2460PF 1080p 144Hz (150Hz max w/ DP, 121Hz max w/ HDMI) TN panel Keyboard: Logitech G610 Orion (Cherry MX Blue) with SteelSeries Apex M260 keycaps Mouse: BenQ Zowie FK1

 

Model: HP Omen 17 17-an110ca CPU: i7-8750H (0.125V core & cache, 50mV SA undervolt) GPU: GTX 1060 6GB Mobile (+80/+450, 1650MHz~1750MHz 0.78V~0.85V) RAM: 8+8GB DDR4-2400 18-17-17-39 2T Storage: HP EX920 1TB PCIe x4 M.2 SSD + Crucial MX500 1TB 2.5" SATA SSD, 128GB Toshiba PCIe x2 M.2 SSD (KBG30ZMV128G) gone cooking externally, 1TB Seagate 7200RPM 2.5" HDD (ST1000LM049-2GH172) left outside Monitor: 1080p 126Hz IPS G-sync

 

Desktop benching:

Cinebench R15 Single thread:168 Multi-thread: 833 

SuperPi (v1.5 from Techpowerup, PI value output) 16K: 0.100s 1M: 8.255s 32M: 7m 45.93s

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×