Jump to content

120hz TN or 144hz IPS?

lei

Hey guys - just waffling between an MSI GS73 and the new Clevo PA71. Like many MSI products, the GS73 has a 120hz 92%NTSC TN display (N173HHE-G32) which has been highly rated on NotebookCheck (99% sRGB, 77% AdobeRGB), while the new Clevo PA71 allegedly has the same display as the Asus ROG G703, and Aorus X9 DT, and is also likely similar to the Aero15x and MSI GS65.

SO, just wondering if anybody has had any experience with any of the 120hz or 144hz screens side by side or one after the other? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any price difference? Because IPS is generally considered to be better than TN as you dont get washed out colors when looking at a sharper angle. If IPS even has about the same refresh as TN, then there's no way the TN is considered, unless other stuff like hardware and price favour the one with TN much more.

CPU: i7-2600K 4751MHz 1.44V (software) --> 1.47V at the back of the socket Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 (BCLK: 103.3MHz) CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-D15 RAM: Adata XPG 2x8GB DDR3 (XMP: 2133MHz 10-11-11-30 CR2, custom: 2203MHz 10-11-10-26 CR1 tRFC:230 tREFI:14000) GPU: Asus GTX 1070 Dual (Super Jetstream vbios, +70(2025-2088MHz)/+400(8.8Gbps)) SSD: Samsung 840 Pro 256GB (main boot drive), Transcend SSD370 128GB PSU: Seasonic X-660 80+ Gold Case: Antec P110 Silent, 5 intakes 1 exhaust Monitor: AOC G2460PF 1080p 144Hz (150Hz max w/ DP, 121Hz max w/ HDMI) TN panel Keyboard: Logitech G610 Orion (Cherry MX Blue) with SteelSeries Apex M260 keycaps Mouse: BenQ Zowie FK1

 

Model: HP Omen 17 17-an110ca CPU: i7-8750H (0.125V core & cache, 50mV SA undervolt) GPU: GTX 1060 6GB Mobile (+80/+450, 1650MHz~1750MHz 0.78V~0.85V) RAM: 8+8GB DDR4-2400 18-17-17-39 2T Storage: HP EX920 1TB PCIe x4 M.2 SSD + Crucial MX500 1TB 2.5" SATA SSD, 128GB Toshiba PCIe x2 M.2 SSD (KBG30ZMV128G) gone cooking externally, 1TB Seagate 7200RPM 2.5" HDD (ST1000LM049-2GH172) left outside Monitor: 1080p 126Hz IPS G-sync

 

Desktop benching:

Cinebench R15 Single thread:168 Multi-thread: 833 

SuperPi (v1.5 from Techpowerup, PI value output) 16K: 0.100s 1M: 8.255s 32M: 7m 45.93s

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers for the swift reply mate! No, price diff is negligible. the MSI screen gets really high marks on paper, but the 144hz panels coming out these days are getting well reviewed too, despite their seemingly weak performance on spectrum calibration. E.g., 
https://www.notebookcheck.net/MSI-GT75VR-7RF-Titan-Pro-i7-7820HK-GTX-1080-Laptop-Review.240904.0.html
vs
https://www.notebookcheck.net/Asus-ROG-Chimera-G703-i7-7820HK-GTX-1080-Full-HD-Laptop-Review.287134.0.html

So, it's all just a bit tough to discern which one would actually be better for design work, being that my last graphics monitor had about 75% AdobeRGB and was an IPS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think anyone will notice the difference between 120hz and 144hz, but if you are moving to either of them from a 60hz screens, then it will be obvious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, lei said:

Cheers for the swift reply mate! No, price diff is negligible. the MSI screen gets really high marks on paper, but the 144hz panels coming out these days are getting well reviewed too, despite their seemingly weak performance on spectrum calibration. E.g., 
https://www.notebookcheck.net/MSI-GT75VR-7RF-Titan-Pro-i7-7820HK-GTX-1080-Laptop-Review.240904.0.html
vs
https://www.notebookcheck.net/Asus-ROG-Chimera-G703-i7-7820HK-GTX-1080-Full-HD-Laptop-Review.287134.0.html

So, it's all just a bit tough to discern which one would actually be better for design work, being that my last graphics monitor had about 75% AdobeRGB and was an IPS.

Then get the ips 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

@ZM Fong might have some comments on this.

CPU: i7-2600K 4751MHz 1.44V (software) --> 1.47V at the back of the socket Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 (BCLK: 103.3MHz) CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-D15 RAM: Adata XPG 2x8GB DDR3 (XMP: 2133MHz 10-11-11-30 CR2, custom: 2203MHz 10-11-10-26 CR1 tRFC:230 tREFI:14000) GPU: Asus GTX 1070 Dual (Super Jetstream vbios, +70(2025-2088MHz)/+400(8.8Gbps)) SSD: Samsung 840 Pro 256GB (main boot drive), Transcend SSD370 128GB PSU: Seasonic X-660 80+ Gold Case: Antec P110 Silent, 5 intakes 1 exhaust Monitor: AOC G2460PF 1080p 144Hz (150Hz max w/ DP, 121Hz max w/ HDMI) TN panel Keyboard: Logitech G610 Orion (Cherry MX Blue) with SteelSeries Apex M260 keycaps Mouse: BenQ Zowie FK1

 

Model: HP Omen 17 17-an110ca CPU: i7-8750H (0.125V core & cache, 50mV SA undervolt) GPU: GTX 1060 6GB Mobile (+80/+450, 1650MHz~1750MHz 0.78V~0.85V) RAM: 8+8GB DDR4-2400 18-17-17-39 2T Storage: HP EX920 1TB PCIe x4 M.2 SSD + Crucial MX500 1TB 2.5" SATA SSD, 128GB Toshiba PCIe x2 M.2 SSD (KBG30ZMV128G) gone cooking externally, 1TB Seagate 7200RPM 2.5" HDD (ST1000LM049-2GH172) left outside Monitor: 1080p 126Hz IPS G-sync

 

Desktop benching:

Cinebench R15 Single thread:168 Multi-thread: 833 

SuperPi (v1.5 from Techpowerup, PI value output) 16K: 0.100s 1M: 8.255s 32M: 7m 45.93s

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, sjb655 said:

I don't think anyone will notice the difference between 120hz and 144hz, but if you are moving to either of them from a 60hz screens, then it will be obvious.

Not worried about refresh rate. Just wondering which one looks better in reality (which is highly subjective, I know). I've never seen either variation of screen, but if I were to see them side-by-side, I'd know real quick which one I prefer, so just wondering if anybody has had that advantage and can offer any opinions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, iiNNeX said:

Never go TN if you have the option of purchasing IPS.

 

That said, high end TN panels are not as bad as people make them out to be.

Looks like that's the group consensus thus far! What's the basic reasoning for that preference?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, lei said:

Not worried about refresh rate. Just wondering which one looks better in reality (which is highly subjective, I know). I've never seen either variation of screen, but if I were to see them side-by-side, I'd know real quick which one I prefer, so just wondering if anybody has had that advantage and can offer any opinions.

I currently have the Asus MG279Q (IPS) and used to have a Asus VG278QE (TN) next to it and I can say that the difference is large in my opinion. When comparing the same picture on both monitors you'll clearly see a difference. I high prefered the IPS monitor.

 

So if the price is not much different between the two, get the IPS one. Note you do have a chance for backlight bleeding with the IPS.

"To the wise, life is a problem; to the fool, a solution" (Marcus Aurelius)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, lei said:

MSI GS73 and the new Clevo PA71

Why don't go for P950 (CFL-H)? Much portable while not sacrificing thermals much. Better build quality than GSVR and optional high refresh rate panel. Buy from resellers that offers repaste like gentechpc and HIDevolution.

 

You won't notice a big difference between 120Hz and 144Hz. Only get a good TN panel if it has better colour coverage (and you need it), you want the lower response times, you don't mind the viewing angles and you're willing to do a manual display calibration (usually they have blue cast). Otherwise go for a good IPS.

Desktop specs:

Spoiler

AMD Ryzen 5 5600 Thermalright Peerless Assassin 120 SE ARGB Gigabyte B550M DS3H mATX

Asrock Challenger Pro OC Radeon RX 6700 XT Corsair Vengeance LPX 16GB (8Gx2) 3600MHz CL18 Kingston NV2 1TB PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD

Montech Century 850W Gold Tecware Nexus Air (Black) ATX Mid Tower

Laptop: Lenovo Ideapad 5 Pro 16ACH6

Phone: Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro 8+128

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, lei said:

SO, just wondering if anybody has had any experience with any of the 120hz or 144hz screens side by side or one after the other? 

HZ aren't that important, the viewing angle of the Panel, Color and other stuff is...

 

Had a couple of screens in my life and if the color change when you move your head (or your chair) a bit, that is really annoying. And that's what you get with a TN Panel.

 

With an IPS Panel, you have better viewing angles...

"Hell is full of good meanings, but Heaven is full of good works"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cool cool - pretty unanimous then. After watching a few YT videos, and everybody's input, it sounds like a no-brainer on the IPS despite the seemingly lesser NTSC coverage. Man, got that sorted out with a quickness. Thanks a ton everybody - IPS it is! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, lei said:

Cool cool - pretty unanimous then. After watching a few YT videos, and everybody's input, it sounds like a no-brainer on the IPS despite the seemingly lesser NTSC coverage. Man, got that sorted out with a quickness. Thanks a ton everybody - IPS it is! 

Do you have a big electronics store somewhere near you?

 

If you do, go to the Monitor section and do some sqats (one or two or so) and you see what we are talking about...

"Hell is full of good meanings, but Heaven is full of good works"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, ZM Fong said:

Why don't go for P950 (CFL-H)? Much portable while not sacrificing thermals much. Better build quality than GSVR and optional high refresh rate panel. Buy from resellers that offers repaste like gentechpc and HIDevolution.

 

You won't notice a big difference between 120Hz and 144Hz. Only get a good TN panel if it has better colour coverage (and you need it), you want the lower response times, you don't mind the viewing angles and you're willing to do a manual display calibration (usually they have blue cast). Otherwise go for a good IPS.

I had originally been looking at that one, but I'll honestly take every inch I can get at 1080p, and the PA71 has the Thunderbolt 3 support and the styling is a little cooler, IMO. 17" is still portable enough and my pen input graphics monitor is around the same size anyhow.


Thermals on the P70 were really good, and I'm going to be getting the works at HIDevolution when I pull the trigger regardless (repasted CPU/GPU, color-calibrated screen, no dead pixels warranty, etc), so that should see me running cool during long sessions. 

Additionally, as sleek as the GS73 formfactor is, it looks a bit hard to service + maintain due to the CPU + GPU + cooling system being on the other side of the MOBO when you have the bottom panel off. A 3-year HID warranty on Clevo/Evoc is the same price as a 2-year on the MSI as well, so another win there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Stefan Payne said:

Do you have a big electronics store somewhere near you?

 

If you do, go to the Monitor section and do some sqats (one or two or so) and you see what we are talking about...

Yeah, I could go to Best Buy, but honestly after watching these two videos (and everybodys input), I'm pretty well convinced that the color consistency is more important the the NTSC rating.
 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, sjb655 said:

I don't think anyone will notice the difference between 120hz and 144hz, but if you are moving to either of them from a 60hz screens, then it will be obvious.

noticeable to eyes keen enough. it should be considered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, iiNNeX said:

That said, high end TN panels are not as bad as people make them out to be.

Agreed, but it doesn't just apply to TN. I got a lower end 144hz TN monitor for Christmas (lower end being relative), and the colors are just terrible. I've tweaked the hell out of the settings, but everything is still a little pale. One of my laptops has a TN one) panel and it's gorgeous. Better than my other laptop's IPS panel.

 

It's all on a spectrum. The lowest end IPS panels are much better than the lowest end TN ones, but you should never assume that it's better because it's IPS.

Make sure to quote or tag me (@JoostinOnline) or I won't see your response!

PSU Tier List  |  The Real Reason Delidding Improves Temperatures"2K" does not mean 2560×1440 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 01/05/2018 at 11:25 AM, iiNNeX said:

Never go TN if you have the option of purchasing IPS.

 

That said, high end TN panels are not as bad as people make them out to be.

I have no issues with my TN. Like most people have said if you can afford the IPS option it's the go to. 

CPU - INTEL CORE i5-8400 @ 2.80GHz (6CPUs)

GPU - NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080

RAM - 16GB

Motherboard - GIGABYTE Z370P

Case - PHANTEKS ECLIPSE P400

Display(s) - ACER PREDATOR XB241H, DELL  S2716DG

Mouse - ROCCAT KONE XTD, LOGITECH G403

Keyboard - RAZER ORNATA, RAZER BLACKWIDOW X TOURNAMENT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×