Jump to content

i7-8700k vs. i7-7700k vs. i7-7740x

Go to solution Solved by Princess Luna,

The best value CPU for high end gaming is the locked i7 8700 because it has every thing, high frequency, 6 cores with hyper-threading and opposed to the i7 8700k you can cheap up on motherboard and cooling since it only has 65w of TDP, they perform identically when the k is at stock.

 

out of these 3 options the worse is the i7 7740x because it uses Mesh.

I am currently looking into buy some new components and I am curious as to which one would be better for me, I do alot of gaming a little bit of streaming and a lot of multi tasking. I have narrowed down my option to

i7-7700k, it is a a name stay for gaming being a quad core and performance looks good and heard good things about it

i7-7740x due to the higher clock speed over the 7700 and the price tag being only $60 more, and the same price as the 8700, it is a stong option for me

i7-8700k has a slower clock speed over the 7740 but it has an extra core for the same price.

due to bad experience with AMD I will not consider them but for the CPU's which one would be better for my needs?

7700k.png

i7 7740x.png

i7 8700k.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Out of those, the 8700k is the best. As for the 7740X, it shouldn't exist, and the 7700k is going to slow down over time as games become more multithreaded.

Lappy: i7 8750H | GTX 1060 Max Q | 16Gb 2666Mhz RAM | 256Gb SSD | 1TB HDD | 1080p IPS panel @60Hz | Dell G5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

The best value CPU for high end gaming is the locked i7 8700 because it has every thing, high frequency, 6 cores with hyper-threading and opposed to the i7 8700k you can cheap up on motherboard and cooling since it only has 65w of TDP, they perform identically when the k is at stock.

 

out of these 3 options the worse is the i7 7740x because it uses Mesh.

Personal Desktop":

CPU: Intel Core i7 10700K @5ghz |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock Pro 4 |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Z490UD ATX|~| RAM: 16gb DDR4 3333mhzCL16 G.Skill Trident Z |~| GPU: RX 6900XT Sapphire Nitro+ |~| PSU: Corsair TX650M 80Plus Gold |~| Boot:  SSD WD Green M.2 2280 240GB |~| Storage: 1x3TB HDD 7200rpm Seagate Barracuda + SanDisk Ultra 3D 1TB |~| Case: Fractal Design Meshify C Mini |~| Display: Toshiba UL7A 4K/60hz |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro.

Luna, the temporary Desktop:

CPU: AMD R9 7950XT  |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock 4 Pro |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Aorus Master |~| RAM: 32G Kingston HyperX |~| GPU: AMD Radeon RX 7900XTX (Reference) |~| PSU: Corsair HX1000 80+ Platinum |~| Windows Boot Drive: 2x 512GB (1TB total) Plextor SATA SSD (RAID0 volume) |~| Linux Boot Drive: 500GB Kingston A2000 |~| Storage: 4TB WD Black HDD |~| Case: Cooler Master Silencio S600 |~| Display 1 (leftmost): Eizo (unknown model) 1920x1080 IPS @ 60Hz|~| Display 2 (center): BenQ ZOWIE XL2540 1920x1080 TN @ 240Hz |~| Display 3 (rightmost): Wacom Cintiq Pro 24 3840x2160 IPS @ 60Hz 10-bit |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro (games / art) + Linux (distro: NixOS; programming and daily driver)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah AMD, is causing a shift towards multithreaded performance, so I would go with that CPU.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Adm_Dolphin said:

I am currently looking into buy some new components and I am curious as to which one would be better for me, I do alot of gaming a little bit of streaming and a lot of multi tasking. I have narrowed down my option to

i7-7700k, it is a a name stay for gaming being a quad core and performance looks good and heard good things about it

i7-7740x due to the higher clock speed over the 7700 and the price tag being only $60 more, and the same price as the 8700, it is a stong option for me

i7-8700k has a slower clock speed over the 7740 but it has an extra core for the same price.

due to bad experience with AMD I will not consider them but for the CPU's which one would be better for my needs?

8700K if you're overclocking. 8700 if not. the 7740X shouldn't even be around, idk what Intel was thinking.

"Sulit" (adj.) something that is worth it

i7 8700K 4.8Ghz delidded / Corsair H100i V2 / Asus Strix Z370-F / G.Skill Trident Z RGB 16GB 3200 / EVGA GTX 1080Ti FTW3 / ASUS ROG SWIFT PG279Q

Samsung 850 EVO 500GB & 250GB - Crucial MX300 M.2 525GB / Fractal Design Define S / Corsair K70 MX Reds / Logitech G502 / Beyerdynamic DT770 250Ohm

SMSL SD793II AMP/DAC - Schiit Magni 3 / PCPP

Old Rig

i5 2500k 4.5Ghz | Gigabyte Z68XP-UD3P | Zotac GTX 980 AMP! Extreme | Crucial Ballistix Tactical 16GB 1866MHz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SeanAngelo said:

8700K if you're overclocking. 8700 if not. the 7740X shouldn't even be around, idk what Intel was thinking.

raw

The execs all had this strange eye infection that impeded common sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Princess Cadence said:

The best value CPU for high end gaming is the locked i7 8700 because it has every thing, high frequency, 6 cores with hyper-threading and opposed to the i7 8700k you can cheap up on motherboard and cooling since it only has 65w of TDP, they perform identically when the k is at stock.

 

out of these 3 options the worse is the i7 7740x because it uses Mesh.

The 7740x does not use mesh core connectivity. Its a higher clocked 7700k on a bigger die.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would there be any performance difference between a quad core and hexa core CPU in gaming? If we talk about the same CPU of course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Paddi01 said:

Would there be any performance difference between a quad core and hexa core CPU in gaming? If we talk about the same CPU of course.

Depends the game, one thing should taken into account as well, while 4 cores usage is becoming the norm for all games, you can't forget about your system needed resources as well, if 4 cores are being used by the game already you might have slow downs whenever Windows or background stuff needs to do something at the same time you're gaming.

 

So even if the game can't take benefit from 6 cores in its code you'll still see benefit from having it and when you do come across a game that is well coded to take advantage of more than 4 cores beauty happens:

 

a9t4AHJ.jpg

i7 7700k = 159fps / i7 8700k = 200fps

Personal Desktop":

CPU: Intel Core i7 10700K @5ghz |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock Pro 4 |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Z490UD ATX|~| RAM: 16gb DDR4 3333mhzCL16 G.Skill Trident Z |~| GPU: RX 6900XT Sapphire Nitro+ |~| PSU: Corsair TX650M 80Plus Gold |~| Boot:  SSD WD Green M.2 2280 240GB |~| Storage: 1x3TB HDD 7200rpm Seagate Barracuda + SanDisk Ultra 3D 1TB |~| Case: Fractal Design Meshify C Mini |~| Display: Toshiba UL7A 4K/60hz |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro.

Luna, the temporary Desktop:

CPU: AMD R9 7950XT  |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock 4 Pro |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Aorus Master |~| RAM: 32G Kingston HyperX |~| GPU: AMD Radeon RX 7900XTX (Reference) |~| PSU: Corsair HX1000 80+ Platinum |~| Windows Boot Drive: 2x 512GB (1TB total) Plextor SATA SSD (RAID0 volume) |~| Linux Boot Drive: 500GB Kingston A2000 |~| Storage: 4TB WD Black HDD |~| Case: Cooler Master Silencio S600 |~| Display 1 (leftmost): Eizo (unknown model) 1920x1080 IPS @ 60Hz|~| Display 2 (center): BenQ ZOWIE XL2540 1920x1080 TN @ 240Hz |~| Display 3 (rightmost): Wacom Cintiq Pro 24 3840x2160 IPS @ 60Hz 10-bit |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro (games / art) + Linux (distro: NixOS; programming and daily driver)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Princess Cadence said:

Depends the game, one thing should taken into account as well, while 4 cores usage is becoming the norm for all games, you can't forget about your system needed resources as well, if 4 cores are being used by the game already you might have slow downs whenever Windows or background stuff needs to do something at the same time you're gaming.

 

So even if the game can't take benefit from 6 cores in its code you'll still see benefit from having it and when you do come across a game that is well coded to take advantage of more than 4 cores beauty happens:

 

a9t4AHJ.jpg

i7 7700k = 159fps / i7 8700k = 200fps

This is very interesting but like you said it depends on the game. In conclusion i would say: 4 cores = sweet spot and 6 cores = future proof

I already made a thread exactly about this and got told it will take a few years before games use these extra cores.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×